Literature DB >> 26803245

Fractional flow reserve implementation in daily clinical practice: A European survey.

Matteo Tebaldi1, Simone Biscaglia2, Alessandro Pecoraro2, Massimo Fineschi3, Gianluca Campo4.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Fractional flow reserve; Index of microcirculatory resistance

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26803245     DOI： 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN： 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Validation of the "smart" minimum FFR Algorithm in an unselected all comer population of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses.

Authors:  Barry Hennigan; Nils Johnson; John McClure; David Corcoran; Stuart Watkins; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Evaluation of fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina: can CT compete with angiography?

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yabin Wang; Heye Zhang; Youbing Yin; Kunlin Cao; Zhifan Gao; Huafeng Liu; William Kongto Hau; Lei Gao; Yundai Chen; Feng Cao; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fractional Flow Reserve: Does a Cut-off Value add Value?

Authors:  Shah R Mohdnazri; Thomas R Keeble; Andrew Sp Sharp
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

4.  The impact of the 3-year ABSORB II trial results on my clinical practice: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Matteo Serenelli; Simone Biscaglia; Elisabetta Tonet; Arnaldo Poli; Elisa Nicolini; Alfonso Ielasi; Andrea Erriquez; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; Giovanni Luigi de Maria; Guido Knapp; Nick Curzen; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Georg M Fröhlich; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pravesh Kumar Bundhun; Chandra Mouli Yanamala; Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy.

Authors:  Martin Sejr-Hansen; Jelmer Westra; Simon Winther; Shengxian Tu; Louise Nissen; Lars Gormsen; Steffen E Petersen; June Ejlersen; Christin Isaksen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Morten Bøttcher; Evald H Christiansen; Niels Ramsing Holm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.357
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.