Emilio Jiménez-Castellanos1, Ana Orozco-Varo2, Gema Arroyo-Cruz2, Alejandro Iglesias-Linares3. 1. Dentistry Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. Electronic address: ejcb@us.es. 2. Associate Professor, Dentistry Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. 3. Associate Professor, Department Stomatology IV, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Deviation from the facial midline and inclination of the dental midline or occlusal plane has been described as extremely influential in the layperson's perceptions of the overall esthetics of the smile. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of deviation from the facial midline and inclination of the dental midline or occlusal plane in a selected sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: White participants from a European population (N=158; 93 women, 65 men) who met specific inclusion criteria were selected for the present study. Standardized 1:1 scale frontal photographs were made, and 3 variables of all participants were measured: midline deviation, midline inclination, and inclination of the occlusal plane. Software was used to measure midline deviation and inclination, taking the bipupillary line and the facial midline as references. Tests for normality of the sample were explored and descriptive statistics (means ±SD) were calculated. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in midline deviation, midline inclination, and occlusion plane (α=.05) RESULTS: Frequencies of midline deviation (>2 mm), midline inclination (>3.5 degrees), and occlusal plane inclination (>2 degrees) were 31.64% (mean 2.7±1.23 mm), 10.75% (mean 7.9 degrees ±3.57), and 25.9% (mean 9.07 degrees ±3.16), respectively. No statistically significant differences (P>.05) were found between sex and any of the esthetic smile values. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of alterations with at least 1 altered parameter that affected smile esthetics was 51.9% in a population from southern Europe.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Deviation from the facial midline and inclination of the dental midline or occlusal plane has been described as extremely influential in the layperson's perceptions of the overall esthetics of the smile. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of deviation from the facial midline and inclination of the dental midline or occlusal plane in a selected sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: White participants from a European population (N=158; 93 women, 65 men) who met specific inclusion criteria were selected for the present study. Standardized 1:1 scale frontal photographs were made, and 3 variables of all participants were measured: midline deviation, midline inclination, and inclination of the occlusal plane. Software was used to measure midline deviation and inclination, taking the bipupillary line and the facial midline as references. Tests for normality of the sample were explored and descriptive statistics (means ±SD) were calculated. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in midline deviation, midline inclination, and occlusion plane (α=.05) RESULTS: Frequencies of midline deviation (>2 mm), midline inclination (>3.5 degrees), and occlusal plane inclination (>2 degrees) were 31.64% (mean 2.7±1.23 mm), 10.75% (mean 7.9 degrees ±3.57), and 25.9% (mean 9.07 degrees ±3.16), respectively. No statistically significant differences (P>.05) were found between sex and any of the esthetic smile values. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of alterations with at least 1 altered parameter that affected smile esthetics was 51.9% in a population from southern Europe.
Authors: Carmen García-Marín; Paula Ferrer; María Victoria Mateos; Nazaret Rodríguez; Encarna de Fernando; José María Marín; Rosa Yanez Journal: Dent Res J (Isfahan) Date: 2018 Sep-Oct
Authors: María Melo; Javier Ata-Ali; Fadi Ata-Ali; Marco Bulsei; Perluigi Grella; Teresa Cobo; José María Martínez-González Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Ana Lidia Carvalho; Liliana Gavinha Costa; Joana Meneses Martins; Maria Conceição Manso; Sandra Gavinha; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Carlos Falcão; Paulo Ribeiro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 3.390