E Pjrek1, P Baldinger-Melich2, M Spies2, K Papageorgiou2, S Kasper2, D Winkler2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: edda.winkler-pjrek@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a subtype of recurrent depressive or bipolar disorder that is characterized by regular onset and remission of affective episodes at the same time of the year. The aim of the present study was to provide epidemiological data and data on the socioeconomic impact of SAD in the general population of Austria. METHODS: We conducted a computer-assisted telephone interview in 910 randomly selected subjects (577 females and 333 males) using the Seasonal Health Questionnaire (SHQ), the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Telephone numbers were randomly drawn from all Austrian telephone books and transformed using the random last digits method. The last birthday method was employed to choose the target person for the interviews. RESULTS: Out of our subjects, 2.5% fulfilled criteria for the seasonal pattern specifier according to DSM-5 and 2.4% (95% CI=1.4-3.5%) were diagnosed with SAD. When applying the ICD-10 criteria 1.9% (95% CI=0.9-2.8%) fulfilled SAD diagnostic criteria. The prevalence of fall-winter depression according to the Kasper-Rosenthal criteria was determined to be 3.5%. The criteria was fulfilled by 15.1% for subsyndromal SAD (s-SAD). We did not find any statistically significant gender differences in prevalence rates. When using the DSM-5 as a gold standard for the diagnosis of SAD, diagnosis derived from the SPAQ yielded a sensitivity of 31.8% and a specificity of 97.2%. Subjects with SAD had significantly higher scores on the SDS and higher rates of sick leave and days with reduced productivity than healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence estimates for SAD with the SHQ are lower than with the SPAQ. Our data are indicative of the substantial burden of disease and the socioeconomic impact of SAD. This epidemiological data shows a lack of gender differences in SAD prevalence. The higher rates of females in clinical SAD samples might, at least in part, be explained by lower help seeking behaviour in males.
BACKGROUND:Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a subtype of recurrent depressive or bipolar disorder that is characterized by regular onset and remission of affective episodes at the same time of the year. The aim of the present study was to provide epidemiological data and data on the socioeconomic impact of SAD in the general population of Austria. METHODS: We conducted a computer-assisted telephone interview in 910 randomly selected subjects (577 females and 333 males) using the Seasonal Health Questionnaire (SHQ), the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Telephone numbers were randomly drawn from all Austrian telephone books and transformed using the random last digits method. The last birthday method was employed to choose the target person for the interviews. RESULTS: Out of our subjects, 2.5% fulfilled criteria for the seasonal pattern specifier according to DSM-5 and 2.4% (95% CI=1.4-3.5%) were diagnosed with SAD. When applying the ICD-10 criteria 1.9% (95% CI=0.9-2.8%) fulfilled SAD diagnostic criteria. The prevalence of fall-winter depression according to the Kasper-Rosenthal criteria was determined to be 3.5%. The criteria was fulfilled by 15.1% for subsyndromal SAD (s-SAD). We did not find any statistically significant gender differences in prevalence rates. When using the DSM-5 as a gold standard for the diagnosis of SAD, diagnosis derived from the SPAQ yielded a sensitivity of 31.8% and a specificity of 97.2%. Subjects with SAD had significantly higher scores on the SDS and higher rates of sick leave and days with reduced productivity than healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence estimates for SAD with the SHQ are lower than with the SPAQ. Our data are indicative of the substantial burden of disease and the socioeconomic impact of SAD. This epidemiological data shows a lack of gender differences in SAD prevalence. The higher rates of females in clinical SAD samples might, at least in part, be explained by lower help seeking behaviour in males.
Authors: Hira Mohyuddin; Polymnia Georgiou; Abhishek Wadhawan; Melanie L Daue; Lisa A Brenner; Claudia Gragnoli; Erika F H Saunders; Dietmar Fuchs; Christopher A Lowry; Teodor T Postolache Journal: Pteridines Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 0.581
Authors: Helle Østergaard Madsen; Shakoor Ba-Ali; Henrik Lund-Andersen; Klaus Martiny; Ida Hageman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Faisal Akram; Tyler B Jennings; John W Stiller; Christopher A Lowry; Teodor T Postolache Journal: Pteridines Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 0.581
Authors: Wim H Winthorst; Annelieke M Roest; Elisabeth H Bos; Ybe Meesters; Brenda W J H Penninx; Willem A Nolen; Peter de Jonge Journal: BJPsych Open Date: 2017-08-30
Authors: Marie Spies; Gregory M James; Chrysoula Vraka; Cécile Philippe; Marius Hienert; Gregor Gryglewski; Arkadiusz Komorowski; Alexander Kautzky; Leo Silberbauer; Verena Pichler; Georg S Kranz; Lukas Nics; Theresa Balber; Pia Baldinger-Melich; Thomas Vanicek; Benjamin Spurny; Edda Winkler-Pjrek; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Mitterhauser; Marcus Hacker; Siegfried Kasper; Rupert Lanzenberger; Dietmar Winkler Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 6.222