Yuliya N Yoncheva1, Krishna Somandepalli1, Philip T Reiss2, Clare Kelly3, Adriana Di Martino1, Mariana Lazar1, Juan Zhou4, Michael P Milham5, F Xavier Castellanos6. 1. New York University, New York. 2. New York University, New York; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY. 3. New York University, New York; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY; Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. 4. Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Singapore. 5. Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY; Child Mind Institute, New York. 6. New York University, New York; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY. Electronic address: castef01@nyumc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can identify structural connectivity alterations in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Most ADHD DTI studies have concentrated on regional differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) despite its limited sensitivity to complex white matter architecture and increasing evidence of global brain differences in ADHD. Here, we examine multiple DTI metrics in separate samples of children and adults with and without ADHD with a principal focus on global between-group differences. METHOD: Two samples: adults with ADHD (n = 42) and without (n = 65) and children with ADHD (n = 82) and without (n = 80) were separately group matched for age, sex, and head motion. Five DTI metrics (FA, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, mean diffusivity, and mode of anisotropy) were analyzed via tract-based spatial statistics. Group analyses tested for diagnostic differences at the global (averaged across the entire white matter skeleton) and regional level for each metric. RESULTS: Robust global group differences in diffusion indices were found in adults, with the largest effect size for mode of anisotropy (MA; Cohen's d = 1.45). Global MA also differed significantly between groups in the pediatric sample (d = 0.68). In both samples, global MA increased classification accuracy compared to the model with clinical Conners' ADHD ratings alone. Regional diagnostic differences did not survive familywise correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: Global DTI metrics, particularly the mode of anisotropy, which is sensitive to crossing fibers, capture connectivity abnormalities in ADHD across both pediatric and adult samples. These findings highlight potential diffuse white matter microarchitecture differences in ADHD.
OBJECTIVE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can identify structural connectivity alterations in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Most ADHD DTI studies have concentrated on regional differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) despite its limited sensitivity to complex white matter architecture and increasing evidence of global brain differences in ADHD. Here, we examine multiple DTI metrics in separate samples of children and adults with and without ADHD with a principal focus on global between-group differences. METHOD: Two samples: adults with ADHD (n = 42) and without (n = 65) and children with ADHD (n = 82) and without (n = 80) were separately group matched for age, sex, and head motion. Five DTI metrics (FA, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, mean diffusivity, and mode of anisotropy) were analyzed via tract-based spatial statistics. Group analyses tested for diagnostic differences at the global (averaged across the entire white matter skeleton) and regional level for each metric. RESULTS: Robust global group differences in diffusion indices were found in adults, with the largest effect size for mode of anisotropy (MA; Cohen's d = 1.45). Global MA also differed significantly between groups in the pediatric sample (d = 0.68). In both samples, global MA increased classification accuracy compared to the model with clinical Conners' ADHD ratings alone. Regional diagnostic differences did not survive familywise correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: Global DTI metrics, particularly the mode of anisotropy, which is sensitive to crossing fibers, capture connectivity abnormalities in ADHD across both pediatric and adult samples. These findings highlight potential diffuse white matter microarchitecture differences in ADHD.
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael Bach; Frederik B Laun; Alexander Leemans; Chantal M W Tax; Geert J Biessels; Bram Stieltjes; Klaus H Maier-Hein Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Nikos Makris; Joseph Biederman; Eve M Valera; George Bush; Jonathan Kaiser; David N Kennedy; Verne S Caviness; Stephen V Faraone; Larry J Seidman Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2006-08-18 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: F Xavier Castellanos; Adriana Di Martino; R Cameron Craddock; Ashesh D Mehta; Michael P Milham Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Yuta Aoki; Yuliya N Yoncheva; Bosi Chen; Tanmay Nath; Dillon Sharp; Mariana Lazar; Pablo Velasco; Michael P Milham; Adriana Di Martino Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Marieke Klein; Marjolein van Donkelaar; Ellen Verhoef; Barbara Franke Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Santosh K Yadav; Ajaz A Bhat; Sheema Hashem; Sabah Nisar; Madeeha Kamal; Najeeb Syed; Mohamed-Ramzi Temanni; Rakesh K Gupta; Saddat Kamran; Muhammad Waqar Azeem; Amit K Srivastava; Puneet Bagga; Sanjeev Chawla; Ravinder Reddy; Michael P Frenneaux; Khalid Fakhro; Mohammad Haris Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 6.222