Literature DB >> 26802744

Use of noise in gene expression as an experimental parameter to test phenotypic effects.

Jian Liu1, Jean-Marie François1, Jean-Pascal Capp1.   

Abstract

During the last decade, the molecular basis for gene expression noise has been mostly deciphered, helping understanding of how gene regulation is controlled and how the generation of cell-cell non-genetic heterogeneity is modulated through noise. In the same period, the functional importance of phenotypic heterogeneity among cell populations has been recognized and widely involved in major biological phenomena. Surprisingly, only a few studies connect these two highly active research fields, most of them having been obtained using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This organism has long been the preferred model for studying many aspects of gene expression noise, especially revealing that evolution seems to act to either increase or decrease gene expression noise, depending on whether the associated phenotypic heterogeneity is beneficial or deleterious to the population. Nevertheless, direct evidences of phenotypic consequences of noise differences are often lacking, in spite of this evolutionary tendency. This rarity is probably due to the complex relationships between mean and noise levels, making the study of the sole effect of noise difficult, and also to problems caused by the detection of cell-cell expression variability of native functional proteins, allowing the testing of specific phenotypic effects. Despite these difficulties, the widespread use of gene expression noise as an experimental parameter at equal mean expression levels to test phenotypic consequences would often help to change explanations of cell population behaviour beyond the simple consideration of average expression levels, and constitute a major step towards single-cell biology.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bet-hedging; evolutionary experiments; gene expression noise; phenotypic heterogeneity; single-cell analysis; stress adaptation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26802744     DOI: 10.1002/yea.3152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yeast        ISSN: 0749-503X            Impact factor:   3.239


  6 in total

1.  Fitness effects of altering gene expression noise in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Fabien Duveau; Andrea Hodgins-Davis; Brian Ph Metzger; Bing Yang; Stephen Tryban; Elizabeth A Walker; Tricia Lybrook; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Transcriptome dynamics along axolotl regenerative development are consistent with an extensive reduction in gene expression heterogeneity in dedifferentiated cells.

Authors:  Carlos Díaz-Castillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Multiplex Analysis to Unravel the Mode of Antifungal Activity of the Plant Defensin HsAFP1 in Single Yeast Cells.

Authors:  Caroline Struyfs; Jolien Breukers; Dragana Spasic; Jeroen Lammertyn; Bruno P A Cammue; Karin Thevissen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Study of in vitro transcriptional binding effects and noise using constitutive promoters combined with UP element sequences in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Qiang Yan; Stephen S Fong
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  Pulsatile inputs achieve tunable attenuation of gene expression variability and graded multi-gene regulation.

Authors:  Dirk Benzinger; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A GRX1 Promoter Variant Confers Constitutive Noisy Bimodal Expression That Increases Oxidative Stress Resistance in Yeast.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Delphine Lestrade; Sevan Arabaciyan; Julien Cescut; Jean-Marie François; Jean-Pascal Capp
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.