Literature DB >> 26802612

Outcomes of 1000 Carotid Wallstent Implantations: Single-Center Experience.

Sonia Ronchey1, Barbara Praquin2, Matteo Orrico1, Eugenia Serrao1, Cristina Ciceroni1, Vittorio Alberti1, Stefano Fazzini1, Nicola Mangialardi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) with Wallstents in a single-center experience.
METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2013, 1000 carotid artery lesions were treated with Carotid Wallstents under cerebral protection in 877 patients (mean age 71.7 ± 8 years; 621 men). Indications for treatment were de novo lesions (>70% asymptomatic and >60% symptomatic); stenoses following carotid endarterectomy, radiation, or neck surgery; contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy; and high surgical risk. All the patients underwent duplex ultrasound and clinical evaluation during follow-up; radiography was performed when fracture or stent migration was suggested by ultrasound.
RESULTS: Procedure success was achieved in 99.3% of patients. Major and minor 30-day adverse events occurred in 2.1% of patients, including stroke (1.8%: 1.3% minor, 0.5% major), myocardial infarction (0.1%), and death (0.2%). Plaque morphology, nature of stenosis, and symptomatic status were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative neurologic events. Restenosis occurred in 3.2% at a mean 45.5-month follow-up and was significantly associated with diabetes, smoking, symptomatic stenosis, de novo stenosis, and calcification (plaque III/IV). No fracture or migration was registered during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: CAS is a valid method for treating carotid artery disease, with very low rates of major adverse events and neurologic complications. The Carotid Wallstent seems to have excellent results, even with complex plaque morphology, and a low incidence of restenosis at follow-up.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angioplasty; carotid artery; carotid endarterectomy; cerebral protection; restenosis; stent; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26802612     DOI: 10.1177/1526602815626558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

1.  The incidence of carotid in-stent stenosis is underestimated ≥50% or ≥80% and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Zachary T AbuRahma; Grant Scott; Elliot Adams; Abe Mata; Matthew Beasley; L Scott Dean; Elaine Davis
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Perioperative and follow-up results in carotid artery stenting with contralateral carotid occlusion.

Authors:  Ahmet Peker; Mine Hayriye Sorgun; Canan Togay Isikay; Ethem Murat Arsava; Mehmet Akif Topcuoglu; Anil Arat
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Early Clinical Outcome and Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Alexandru Achim; Dávid Lackó; Artúr Hüttl; Csaba Csobay-Novák; Ádám Csavajda; Péter Sótonyi; Béla Merkely; Balázs Nemes; Zoltán Ruzsa
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.061

4.  Calcification in original plaque and restenosis following carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Katano; Yusuke Nishikawa; Hiroshi Yamada; Mitsuhito Mase
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 5.  The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Francesco Stilo; Nunzio Montelione; Rosalinda Calandrelli; Marisa Distefano; Francesco Spinelli; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Fabio Pilato
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.