| Literature DB >> 26802582 |
Friedrich-Carl von Rundstedt1, Kimal Rajapakshe2, Jing Ma3, James M Arnold2, Jie Gohlke2, Vasanta Putluri4, Rashmi Krishnapuram2, D Badrajee Piyarathna5, Yair Lotan6, Daniel Gödde7, Stephan Roth8, Stephan Störkel7, Jonathan M Levitt9, George Michailidis3, Arun Sreekumar10, Seth P Lerner11, Cristian Coarfa12, Nagireddy Putluri13.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We used targeted mass spectrometry to study the metabolic fingerprint of urothelial cancer and determine whether the biochemical pathway analysis gene signature would have a predictive value in independent cohorts of patients with bladder cancer.Entities:
Keywords: mass spectrometry; metabolic networks and pathways; metabolomics; urinary bladder neoplasms; urothelium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26802582 PMCID: PMC4861129 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Urol ISSN: 0022-5347 Impact factor: 7.450
Clinical characteristics of 60 patients
| No. Pts (%) | |
|---|---|
| Pathological stage: | |
| Ta | 1 (2) |
| T1 | 1 (2) |
| T2 | 12 (19) |
| T3 | 23 (37) |
| T4 | 9 (14) |
| Normal | 14 (22) |
| Grade: | |
| High | 44 (96) |
| Missing | 2 (4) |
| Lymph node metastasis: | |
| Present | 21 (45) |
| Absent | 25 (53) |
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: | |
| Present | 6 (13) |
| Absent | 40 (85) |
No low grade BCa.
Figure 1Overview of strategy used to profile and characterize BCa metabolome
| Gene | Log2_FC(tumor/benign) |
|---|---|
| XDH | 4.28 |
| TDO2 | 3.73 |
| GAD1 | 2.88 |
| CHIT1 | 2.86 |
| DNMT3B | 2.54 |
| PYCR1 | 2.53 |
| KMO | 1.83 |
| TYMP | 1.52 |
| PYCRL | 1.45 |
| SUV420H2 | 1.2 |
| B4GALT3 | 1.14 |
| LYPLA2 | 1.08 |
| PLA2G15 | 1.08 |
| DNMT1 | 1 |
| NNMT | −1.01 |
| BST1 | −1.05 |
| TARSL2 | −1.1 |
| SETD7 | −1.12 |
| GPD1 | −1.13 |
| GPD1L | −1.19 |
| EXTL1 | −1.32 |
| GATM | −1.33 |
| GAMT | −1.43 |
| ALDH7A1 | −1.64 |
| DPYD | −1.66 |
| ALDH1B1 | −1.76 |
| PLA2G4A | −1.77 |
| PIPOX | −1.96 |
| ALDH2 | −2.37 |
| INMT | −2.61 |
Figure 2Metabolomic alteration in BCa and heat map shows 31 named differential metabolites in urothelial cancer relative to benign samples. Columns represent individual tissue samples. Rows represent distinct metabolites. Yellows indicate metabolite elevation. Greens indicate metabolite decrease relative to average level (Color Key).
Figure 3A, enriched pathways and processes in metabolomic gene signature (hypergeometric distribution p <0.05). Differential set of metabolites was mapped to corresponding genes, which were used to enrich for biochemical pathways. Red indicates pathways associated with current metabolic signature. Green indicates pathways associated with previous metabolic signature.B, pathways common to current and previous metabolic signatures. C, novel pathways from current metabolic signature.
Figure 4Survival analyses. A, in TCGA-BLCA (Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma) cohort for integrated metabolomics/transcriptomics signature, which was significantly associated with worse prognosis in this cohort. B to D, in BCa cohorts of integrated 6-gene signature consisting of CHIT1, DNMT1, GPD1, PLA2G4A, TARSL2 and SETD7, which was significantly associated with worse prognosis in all 3 cohorts. B, TCGA. C, Kim et al (GSE13507).D, Lindgren et al (GSE32548).