Kyu-Man Han1, Eunsoo Won1, Youngbo Sim2, Woo-Suk Tae3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Brain Convergence Research Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Brain Convergence Research Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: woosuk.tae@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hippocampal volume loss is known as the best-replicated finding of structural brain imaging studies on major depressive disorder (MDD). Several evidences suggest localized mechanisms of hippocampal neuroplasticity lead the brain imaging studies on the hippocampus and MDD to perform analyses in the subfield level. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in total and subfield hippocampal volumes, between medication-naïve female MDD patients and healthy controls, through automated segmentation and volumetric methods. METHODS: Twenty medication-naïve female patients diagnosed with MDD and 21 age-matched healthy controls, underwent T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance scanning. Total volumes of both hippocampi and subfield regions were calculated by the automated procedure for volumetric measures implemented in FreeSurfer and automated segmentation method by Van Leemput et al. RESULTS: We observed patients to have significantly smaller volumes of the left hippocampus, subiculum, cornu ammonis 2-3, cornu ammonis 4-dentate gyrus, and right subiculum compared to healthy controls. There were no significant predictors for these subfield region volumes among the illness burden-related parameters including duration of illness, number of depressive episodes, severity of depressive symptoms and memory performances. LIMITATIONS: Our findings relied on the data of only female participants. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant volume reductions in several hippocampal subfield regions in medication-naïve female MDD patients. Our results are consistent with neurobiological evidences on hippocampal neuroplasticity in MDD, and replicate previous findings that suggest morphologic changes of hippocampal subfields in MDD patients.
BACKGROUND: Hippocampal volume loss is known as the best-replicated finding of structural brain imaging studies on major depressive disorder (MDD). Several evidences suggest localized mechanisms of hippocampal neuroplasticity lead the brain imaging studies on the hippocampus and MDD to perform analyses in the subfield level. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in total and subfield hippocampal volumes, between medication-naïve female MDDpatients and healthy controls, through automated segmentation and volumetric methods. METHODS: Twenty medication-naïve female patients diagnosed with MDD and 21 age-matched healthy controls, underwent T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance scanning. Total volumes of both hippocampi and subfield regions were calculated by the automated procedure for volumetric measures implemented in FreeSurfer and automated segmentation method by Van Leemput et al. RESULTS: We observed patients to have significantly smaller volumes of the left hippocampus, subiculum, cornu ammonis 2-3, cornu ammonis 4-dentate gyrus, and right subiculum compared to healthy controls. There were no significant predictors for these subfield region volumes among the illness burden-related parameters including duration of illness, number of depressive episodes, severity of depressive symptoms and memory performances. LIMITATIONS: Our findings relied on the data of only female participants. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant volume reductions in several hippocampal subfield regions in medication-naïve female MDDpatients. Our results are consistent with neurobiological evidences on hippocampal neuroplasticity in MDD, and replicate previous findings that suggest morphologic changes of hippocampal subfields in MDDpatients.
Authors: Gislaine Olescowicz; Tuane B Sampaio; Cristine de Paula Nascimento-Castro; Patricia S Brocardo; Joana Gil-Mohapel; Ana Lúcia S Rodrigues Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: Mamun Al-Amin; DanaKai Bradford; Robert K P Sullivan; Nyoman D Kurniawan; Yeonsil Moon; Seol-Heui Han; Andrew Zalesky; Thomas H J Burne Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jennifer T Sneider; Julia E Cohen-Gilbert; Derek A Hamilton; Anna M Seraikas; Emily N Oot; Eleanor M Schuttenberg; Lisa D Nickerson; Marisa M Silveri Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 2.376