| Literature DB >> 26801899 |
Kennedy Amone-P'Olak1, Tlholego Molemane Lekhutlile2, Emilio Ovuga3, Rosemary Ann Abbott4, Richard Meiser-Stedman5, David Gage Stewart6, Peter Brian Jones7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although sexual violence in war is associated with long-term mental health problems, little is known about its association with general functioning and the factors that explain this association. This study aims to illuminate the path from sexual violence to poor functioning. The prevalence of sexual violence among formerly abducted girls in Northern Uganda was assessed as well as the extent to which stigma and community relations explain the association between sexual violence and general functioning.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26801899 PMCID: PMC4722696 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2735-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Descriptive statistics of variables in the study (N = 210)
| Total (M, SD) | Min-Max | Reported no sexual violence (M, SD) | Reported sexual violence (M, SD) | t-test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 22.06 | 2.01 | 18–25 | 21.47 (2.05) | 22.37 (1.91) | t = −3.15, |
| Age at capture | 12.64 | 3.10 | 07–20 | 11.92 (2.45) | 12.99 (3.31) | t = −2.65, |
| Duration in captivity | 3.48 | 3.40 | 0.50–17.75 | 3.25 (3.07) | 3.63 (3.57) | t = −0.76, ns |
| Daily functioning | 17.50 | 11.57 | 0–46 | 15.39 (10.76) | 18.70 (11.84) | t = −2.21, |
| Stigma | 40.11 | 9.32 | 13–58 | 36.40 (9.77) | 42.19 (8.43) | t = −4.63, |
| Community relations | 6.21 | 2.29 | 0–9 | 5.38 (2.36) | 6.77 (2.05) | t = −4.47, |
Key: ns not significant, p significance, M mean, SD standard deviation, Min minimum, Max maximum
Bivariate correlations between variables in the study
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Age at baseline | 1 |
| .063 | -.028 |
| .003 |
| 2 | Duration in captivity | 1 | .077 | .078 | -.08 | .015 | |
| 3 | Sexual violence | 1 |
|
|
| ||
| 4 | Stigma | 1 |
|
| |||
| 5 | Community relations | 1 |
| ||||
| 6 | Daily functioning | 1 |
Key: **p <.01, *p <.001, significant statistics are in bold
Fig. 1Mediation model
Fig. 2Mediation by stigma/discrimination of the relations between reported sexual violence and general functioning. Total effect: β = .15(95 % CI: .02, .30). Total indirect effect: β = .07(95 % CI). Total direct effect: β = .08(95 % CI: −.07, .22). The β below the continuous line from reported sexual violence to functioning represents the total effect of reported sexual violence on general functioning while the β above the dotted line represent the effect of reported sexual violence after stigma was added to the model as a mediator. Approximately 47 % of the effect of reported sexual violence on functioning is mediated through stigma. The direct effect of reported sexual violence on stigma reduced and became insignificant (β = .08 (95 % CI: −.07, .22)). All analyses were adjusted for age, duration in captivity and clustering by districts
Fig. 3Mediation by community relations of the relations between reported sexual violence and general functioning. Total effect: β = .15(95 % CI: .02, .30). Total indirect effect: β = .10 (95 % CI: 02, .21). Total direct effect: β = .05 (95 % CI: −.08, .19). The β below the continuous line from reported sexual violence to general functioning represents the total effect of reported sexual violence on general functioning while the β above the dotted line represent the effect of reported sexual violence after community relation was added to the model as a mediator. Approximately 67 % of the effects of reported sexual violence on general functioning is mediated through community relations. The direct effect of reported sexual violence on functioning attenuated and became insignificant (β = .05 (95 % CI: −.08, .19)). All analyses were adjusted for age, duration in captivity and clustering by districts