Literature DB >> 26801508

Hard Copy Durable Patient Cancer Education Materials: Do They Still Matter?

Darryl Schuitevoerder1, Jeanine Fortino2, John T Vetto3,4.   

Abstract

Traditional hard copy information materials are still present in our cancer clinics. While their actual impact on patient care often goes un-assessed, it is important to understand their role in today's electronic age where information can easily be obtained from various sources. It has remained the practice in our melanoma clinic to provide an information booklet to all of our new patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how useful this booklet was, as well as determine the current resources our patients use to gather cancer information. All patients referred to the clinic in the previous 3 years were pooled from our prospective, IRB-approved, melanoma sentinel node database. Of these 205 patients, a valid email address was listed for 147. A ten-question survey was emailed to all of these patients, who were not told ahead of time that their experience with the booklet would be studied. Seventy-seven of the 147 (52 %) patients polled responded. Fifty-eight (75 %) remembered receiving the booklet at their initial consultation. Forty-four (76 %) of those patients rated it as extremely or very useful, and no patients reported the booklet as not useful at all. Eighty-eight percent of respondents found the information to be clear and helpful. Sixty-four percent remembered the provider reviewing the material with them, and nearly all of these patients found that helpful. When asked to rank the importance of the various resources for obtaining cancer information, providers were ranked as most important, followed by the information booklet and Internet information sites. Internet blogs and friends and family were rated as the least important sources of information. Even in the current electronic age, our results indicate that information shared by providers, including the hard copy education booklet, was the most important source of information for our newly referred melanoma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer education; Hard copy education materials; Melanoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26801508     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-0987-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  12 in total

Review 1.  Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Sameer Badarudeen; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Audrey Jusko Friedman; Roxanne Cosby; Susan Boyko; Jane Hatton-Bauer; Gale Turnbull
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The impact of distribution of a patient-education pamphlet in a multidisciplinary breast clinic.

Authors:  J T Vetto; P M Dubois; I P Vetto
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Marjolein Gysels; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Patient preferences concerning treatment plans, survivorship care plans, education, and support services.

Authors:  Tiffany J Marbach; Julie Griffie
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients.

Authors:  J A Sim; J S Shin; S M Park; Y J Chang; A Shin; D Y Noh; W Han; H K Yang; H J Lee; Y W Kim; Y T Kim; S Y Jeong; J H Yoon; Y J Kim; D S Heo; T Y Kim; D Y Oh; H G Wu; H J Kim; E K Chie; K W Kang; Y H Yun
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C J McPherson; I J Higginson; J Hearn
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-09

Review 8.  A systematic review of computer-based softwares for educating patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Eva Beranova; Catherine Sykes
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-11-02

9.  The effect of educational brochures on knowledge and emotional distress in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears.

Authors:  D E Stewart; G M Lickrish; S Sierra; H Parkin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  A systematic review of randomized control trials evaluating the effectiveness of interactive computerized asthma patient education programs.

Authors:  Kristin L Bussey-Smith; Roger D Rossen
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.347

View more
  2 in total

1.  Exploring the melanoma survivorship experience: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Z J Wolner; N I Flowers; M L Yushak; S C Chen; H Yeung
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 11.113

2.  Patient knowledge, experiences and preferences regarding retinoblastoma and research: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Catherine Moses; Kaitlyn Flegg; Helen Dimaras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 3.377

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.