BACKGROUND: Prolonged sitting at desks during the school day without a break may result in off-task behavior in students. This study was designed to examine the effects of a classroom physical activity intervention, using TAKE 10!, on elementary school students' on-task behavior. Nine classes (3rd to 5th grades) from 1 elementary school participated in the program (4-week baseline and 8-week intervention). METHODS: The students' on-task behavior was measured using systematic direct observation. Observations occurred once a week during weeks 1 to 4 (baseline) and weeks 8 to 12 (intervention). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare on-task behavior between observation periods. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease (P = .001) in mean percentage on-task behavior from preno TAKE 10! (91.2 ± 3.4) to postno TAKE 10! (83.5 ± 4.0) during the baseline period, whereas there was a significant increase (P = .001) in mean percentage on-task behavior from pre-TAKE 10! (82.3 ± 4.5) to post-TAKE 10! (89.5 ± 2.7) during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Furthermore, students who received more daily TAKE 10! were found to be more on-task than students who received less TAKE 10!. The TAKE 10! program is effective in improving students' on-task behavior in the classroom.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Prolonged sitting at desks during the school day without a break may result in off-task behavior in students. This study was designed to examine the effects of a classroom physical activity intervention, using TAKE 10!, on elementary school students' on-task behavior. Nine classes (3rd to 5th grades) from 1 elementary school participated in the program (4-week baseline and 8-week intervention). METHODS: The students' on-task behavior was measured using systematic direct observation. Observations occurred once a week during weeks 1 to 4 (baseline) and weeks 8 to 12 (intervention). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare on-task behavior between observation periods. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease (P = .001) in mean percentage on-task behavior from preno TAKE 10! (91.2 ± 3.4) to postno TAKE 10! (83.5 ± 4.0) during the baseline period, whereas there was a significant increase (P = .001) in mean percentage on-task behavior from pre-TAKE 10! (82.3 ± 4.5) to post-TAKE 10! (89.5 ± 2.7) during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Furthermore, students who received more daily TAKE 10! were found to be more on-task than students who received less TAKE 10!. The TAKE 10! program is effective in improving students' on-task behavior in the classroom.
Authors: Ann Pulling Kuhn; Edward Kim; Hannah G Lane; Yan Wang; Rachel Deitch; Lindsey Turner; Erin R Hager; Elizabeth A Parker Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Michael W Beets; Anthony Okely; R Glenn Weaver; Collin Webster; David Lubans; Tim Brusseau; Russ Carson; Dylan P Cliff Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Katie R Hosteng; Alison Phillips Reichter; Jacob E Simmering; Lucas J Carr Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ryan D Burns; Yang Bai; You Fu; Christopher D Pfledderer; Timothy A Brusseau Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Chloe Emonson; Jane McGillivray; Emily J Kothe; Nicole Rinehart; Nicole Papadopoulos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Álvaro Infantes-Paniagua; Ana Filipa Silva; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Hugo Sarmento; Francisco Tomás González-Fernández; Sixto González-Víllora; Filipe Manuel Clemente Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-05-21
Authors: Spyridoula Vazou; Collin A Webster; Gregory Stewart; Priscila Candal; Cate A Egan; Adam Pennell; Laura B Russ Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2020-01-06