| Literature DB >> 26800280 |
Rafal Panek1,2,3, Liam Welsh2,3, Alex Dunlop2,3, Kee H Wong2,3, Angela M Riddell1,2,3, Dow-Mu Koh1,2,3, Maria A Schmidt1,2,3, Simon Doran1,2,3, Dualta Mcquaid2,3, Georgina Hopkinson3, Cheryl Richardson3, Christopher M Nutting3, Shreerang A Bhide2,3, Kevin J Harrington2,3, Simon P Robinson1,2, Kate L Newbold2,3, Martin O Leach1,2,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether quantitation of T2* is sufficiently repeatable and sensitive to detect clinically relevant oxygenation levels in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) at 3T.Entities:
Keywords: BOLD; MRI; head and neck; hypoxia; oxygen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26800280 PMCID: PMC4915498 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging ISSN: 1053-1807 Impact factor: 4.813
Summary of Patient Characteristics
| Patient no. | Age (years) | Gender | Site | Stage | HPV status | Interval between scans (hours) | Hct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI1 | MRI2 | |||||||
| 1 | 57 | M | Oropharynx | T3N2bM0 | +ve | 36 | 0.300 | 0.343 |
| 2 | 51 | M | Oropharynx | T2N2aM0 | +ve | 48 | 0.417 | 0.411 |
| 3 | 50 | M | Hypopharynx | T3N2bM0 | −ve | 24 | 0.431 | 0.418 |
| 4 | 63 | M | Oropharynx | T4N0M0 | +ve | 144 | 0.459 | 0.441 |
| 5 | 58 | M | Oropharynx | T2N2cM0 | +ve | 48 | 0.283 | 0.354 |
| 6 | 64 | M | Supraglottis | T2N2bM0 | −ve | 144 | 0.441 | 0.431 |
| 7 | 64 | M | Oropharynx | T2N2c M0 | +ve | 168 | 0.437 | 0.431 |
| 8 | 64 | M | Supraglottis | T3N2cM0 | −ve | 96 | 0.364 | 0.400 |
| 9 | 44 | M | Oropharynx | T1N2bM0 | Unk | 168 | 0.397 | 0.398 |
| 10 | 51 | F | Oropharynx | T3N2cM0 | +ve | 72 | 0.389 | 0.402 |
*Unk = Unknown human papilloma virus (HPV) status.
Figure 1A: T 2‐weighted image for a 50‐year‐old stage IV HNSCC patient (patient 3) with outlined primary VOI (red). B: parametric maps calculated for visit 1 (three representative slices at the center of the tumor). C: Boxplots showing distributions of measured in primary tumor VOI in both visits and differences in between the visits. D: Differences in between the visits on a per‐voxel basis.
Summary of Tumor Characteristics
| Pt. No. | 1° Vol. [cc] | LNs Vol. [cc] | Median T2
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1° | LNs | |||||||
| MRI1 | MRI2 | Δ | MRI1 | MRI2 | Δ | |||
| 1 | 12 | 15 | NA | NA | NA | 17.6 | 20.7 | 3.1 |
| 2 | 17.8 | 21 | 3.2 | |||||
| 2 | 32 | 3 | 18.3 | 18.7 | 0.4 | 25.6 | 26.7 | 1.1 |
| 3 | 27 | 2 | 18.5 | 18.8 | 0.3 | 24.2 | 23.3 | −0.9 |
| 7 | 22.9 | 24.6 | 1.7 | |||||
| 2 | 17 | 18.9 | 1.9 | |||||
| 4 | 29 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 0.01 | ||||
| 5 | 173 | 6 | 19.2 | 17.8 | −1.4 | 21.5 | 20.3 | −1.1 |
| 2 | 21.5 | 24 | 2.5 | |||||
| 1 | 26 | 26.2 | 0.2 | |||||
| 6 | 15 | 16.3 | 19.7 | 3.4 | ||||
| 7 | 6 | 60 | 18.6 | 18.5 | −0.2 | 26.3 | 26.2 | −0.1 |
| 8 | 10 | 28.4 | 29.2 | 0.8 | ||||
| 15 | 24.6 | 23.9 | −0.8 | |||||
| 9 | 17 | 21.7 | 22.5 | 0.8 | ||||
| 10 | 45 | 5 | 16.81 | 19.19 | 2.4 | NA | NA | NA |
1°: primary tumor, LNs: lymph nodes.
*NA = insufficient or poor quality data.
Figure 2Bland–Altman plot showing difference between median VOI in two scans against the mean value of for both visits (CR = coefficient of repeatability, CV = coefficient of variation). Mean difference (solid line) and 95% limits of agreement (dotted lines) are also shown, with corresponding 95% confidence limits (error bars).
Figure 3A: Transverse relaxation time constant simulated for blood volume fractions in the range 1–30 mL/100g plotted as a function of blood O2 saturation (hematocrit: 0.4, microcapillary vascular factor 0.85, field strength: 3T). B: Relative dependence of fractional blood oxygenation and pO2 simulated for BV = 5 mL/100g. The dashed line shows limits of agreement (LoA, α = 0.05). The oxygen partial pressure was calculated using Hill's equation (human blood, coefficient for blood oxygen binding: 2.26, temperature: 37°C, pH: 7.4).