Literature DB >> 26800211

High Uric Acid (UA) Negatively Affects Serum Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP 5b) Immunoassay.

Zhi-Qi Wu1, Yan Zhang1, Erfu Xie1, Wei-Juan Song1, Rui-Xia Yang1, Cheng-Jing Yan1, Bing-Feng Zhang1, Hua-Guo Xu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases often occur in the majority of patients with advanced cancer, such as prostate cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer. Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP 5b), a novel bone resorption marker, has been used gradually in the clinics as a specific and sensitive marker of bone resorption for the early diagnosis of cancer patients with bone metastasis. Here, we reported that high concentrations of uric acid (UA) lead to decrease of TRACP 5b levels and determined whether TRACP 5b level was associated with UA in interference experiment.
METHODS: A total of 77 patients with high concentrations of UA and 77 healthy subjects were tested to evaluate the differences in their TRACP 5b levels. Serial dilutions of UA were respectively spiked with a known concentration of TRACP 5b standard sample, then Serum TRACP 5b was detected by using bone TRAP® Assay. A correction equation was set to eliminate UA-derived TRACP 5b false-decrease. The effect of this correction was evaluated in high-UA individuals.
RESULTS: The average TRACP level of the high-UA individuals (1.47 ± 0.62 U/L) was significantly lower than that of the healthy subjects (2.62 ± 0.63 U/L) (t-test, p < 0.0001). The UA correction equation derived: ΔTRACP 5b = -1.9751lgΔUA + 3.7365 with an R2 = 0.98899. Application of the UA correction equation resulted in a statistically non-significant difference in TRACP 5b values between the healthy subjects and high-UA individuals (p = 0.24).
CONCLUSIONS: High UA concentrations can falsely decrease TRACP 5b levels due to a method-related systematic error. To avoid misdiagnoses or inappropriate therapeutic decisions, increased attention should be paid to UA interference, when TRACP 5b is used for early diagnosis of cancer patients with bone metastasis, evaluation of the aggressiveness of osteosarcoma or prediction of survival in prostate cancer and breast cancer with bone metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26800211      PMCID: PMC4723035          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

With very few exceptions, the natural history of all kinds of tumors is known to progress from localized indolent stages to aggressive metastatic stages[1,2]. Once metastasis occurs, most patients become incurable[3]. Bone metastases are common in tumor metastases. Bone metastases often occur in the majority of patients with advanced cancer, such as prostate cancer[4], lung cancer[5] and breast cancer[6]. Bone metastases can cause severe pain to the patients, as well as significant resource requirements and costs to the care providers. Bone metastases can also lead to significant morbidity such as bone pain, pathological fractures, impaired mobility, hypercalcemia and spinal cord compression[7-10]. Accurate reliable detection of metastatic bone disease is very important for primary staging because it could affect the therapeutic decision[7]. The diagnosis of bone metastasis is usually performed initially with bone scintigraphy screening and confirmed by plain radiography and/or computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging[11]. Although the sensitivity of bone scintigraphy is quite high, its specificity is not satisfactory because of false-positive values caused by inflammation and traumatic fracture[12]. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP 5b) is generally secreted by osteoclasts during bone resorption[13,14]. Its activity can be specifically measured in serum by immunoassays and has been devised as a marker of bone resorption[5,6,15,16]. The role of serum TRACP 5b has been well documented in diseases with a high bone resorption rate, such as osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, bone metastases from breast cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer[17-20]. Serum TRACP 5b has been used gradually in the clinics as a specific and sensitive marker of bone resorption for the diagnosis of cancer patients with bone metastasis [21,22], for the evaluation of the aggressiveness of osteosarcoma [23], and as a marker of late loosening of total hip arthroplasty [24]. In addition, TRACP 5b has been proved to be predictive of survival in prostate cancer and breast cancer with bone metastases[25,26]. Uric acid (UA) is a heterocyclic compound of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and hydrogen with the formula C5H4N4O3. UA is a product of the metabolic breakdown of purine nucleotides. High blood concentrations of UA can lead to gout[27]. High intake of dietary purine, high-fructose corn syrup, table sugar, and certain drugs such as thiazide diuretics can cause increased levels of UA. Hyperuricemia is associated with increased risk of colorectal, breast, prostate, and other cancers[28-30]. Meanwhile, cancer itself could promote hyperuricemia through cancer related cell death, due to cancer or cancer treatments[31]. Recently, we observed that sixteen cancer patients with bone metastasis diagnosed by bone scintigraphy showed no obviously increased TRACP 5b levels. Meanwhile, these patients showed higher UA level than others. Here, we investigated the correlation between the concentrations of UA and TRACP 5b in a random sample of 77 high-UA patients and determined whether TRACP 5b level was associated with UA in interference experiments.

Materials and Methods

Serum sampling

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. All samples were collected from August 2014 to June 2015. Patients with cancer, hepatitis, renal dysfunction and inflammatory disease were excluded from serum collection. A total of 77 patients (Hyperuricemia), including 16 women and 61 men (median age, 36 yr; range, 17–66 yr) formed the study group. Additionally, 77 healthy subjects were sampled as the control group, including 16 women and 61 men (median age, 43 yr; range, 22–66 yr).

Data collection

The alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood glucose (Glu), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CREA) and uric acid (UA) quantitation were analyzed using an Olympus AU5400 automatic chemical analyzer and commercial kits (Olympus, Janpan) according to the instruction manual. White blood cells (WBC) and neutrophils (NEU) % were counted by the Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) on an Elecsys E-602 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Serum tartrate-resistant acid (TRACP) 5b was detected by using bone TRAP® Assay (IDS Ltd, Boldon, UK).

UA interference experiment and derivation of a UA correction equation

A known concentration of TRACP 5b standard sample was divided into 6 aliquots. Serial dilutions of UA (250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000μM) were prepared from UA standard subject. The 5 aliquots were then spiked at 3:2 with each UA solution. This generated 5 different test samples with the same TRACP 5b level, whose final UA concentrations ranged from 100 to 1600 μM. An aliquot containing DDW (double distilled water) instead of UA served as a blank. Serum TRACP 5b assay was performed according to manufacturer’s protocol. The change in TRACP 5b level caused by UA spikes was measured and marked as a function of UA. A linear formulation for the effect of UA-derived TRACP 5b was made based on the best least squares fit.

Performance evaluation of the correction equation

The concentrations of both TRACP 5b and UA were measured in serum sample of each donor. Each high-UA individual's UA-corrected TRACP 5b concentration was calculated based on the UA-TRACP 5b correction equation. Increasing UA concentration means difference value between each high-UA individual's and mean value of healthy subjects’.

Statistical analysis

Results were presented as means and ranges. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 16.0. Two-tailed t-tests were used for significance testing between groups of continuous data. Corrected TRACP 5b concentration was calculated according to the formula: ΔTRACP 5b (U/L) = -1.9751lgΔUA (μM) + 3.7365. For all statistical comparisons a p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical standards and patient consent

Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Because all the samples used in this study were collected from clinical residual specimen, written informed content from each patient was waived.

Results and Discussion

TRACP 5b is frequently used in clinical practice as a tool for cancer patients with bone metastasis. However, recently, we observed that sixteen cancer patients bone metastasis diagnosed by bone scintigraphy showed no obviously increased TRACP 5b levels (TRACP 5b concentration: 3.99 ± 0.41 U/L). Meanwhile, these patients showed relatively higher serum UA concentrations (UA concentration: 398.4 ± 40.4 IU/ml). So we inspected that high UA concentrations were associated with decrease of TRACP 5b levels for cancer patients bone metastasis. To evaluate whether there was a correlation between high concentrations of UA and decrease of TRACP 5b levels, we randomly tested the TRACP 5b levels of 77 high-UA individuals (UA concentration: 463.5 ± 50.8 IU/ml) and 77 healthy subjects (UA concentration: 293.4 ± 56.9 IU/ml). The results showed that the average TRACP 5b levels of the high-UA individuals (1.47± 0.62 U/L) were significantly lower (t-test, p<0.0001) than that of the healthy subjects (2.62 ± 0.63 U/L) (Table 1) (Fig 1A–1C)(S1 File). These data indicated that high concentrations of UA lead to decrease of TRACP 5b levels is not an individual case that occurred in few cancer patients with bone metastasis but a universal phenomenon. We think there are at least two possible reasons for this. The first possible reason is that high concentrations of UA directly down-regulate expression of TRACP 5b at mRNA or protein level. The second possible reason is that high concentrations of UA interfere with TRACP 5b tests. As we know, UA could lower the value for glucose as determined by “GOD-Perid” method[32]. Here, we firstly checked if high concentrations of UA interfered with TRACP 5b tests. We conducted an interference experiment. As mentioned in the “Materials and Methods”, serial dilutions of UA were spiked into TRACP 5b standard samples. As a result, we observed dose-dependent decrease in TRACP 5b concentrations (Fig 2). After normalizing the measured TRACP 5b in each sample by dislodging the TRACP 5b level of the aliquot containing DDW instead of UA, then marking the change as a function of increment of UA, the least squares linear fit was set for ΔTRACP 5b (U/L) and marked as a function of UA (μM): ΔTRACP 5b (U/L) = -1.9751lgΔUA (μM) + 3.7365 with an R2 = 0.98899 (Fig 3). This implied 0.21 U/L false-decrease in TRACP 5b for each 100μM increase of UA concentration. Application of the UA correction resulted in a statistically non-significant difference in TRACP 5b values between the healthy subjects and high-UA individuals (p = 0.24)(Fig 4), which suggested that concentrations of UA were the key cause of differences in TRACP 5b level between the high-UA individuals and the healthy subjects. Therefore, we believed that the differences of TRACP 5b levels were mainly caused by a method-related systematic error. In addition, it was recently reported that higher UA level suppressed osteoclastogenesis, indicating that UA might lower TRACP 5b level [33]. We will further elucidate whether UA has direct effects in expression of TRACP 5b in our future work.
Table 1

Multiple parameters of serum samples and statistical analyses between groups.

ParameterStudy groupControl groupP value
Number of patients (n)7777/
Gender (male/female)61/1661/16/
Age (years, mean ± SD)40.58 ± 12.6042.24 ± 11.470.883
WBC (*109/L, mean ± SD)6.65 ± 1.206.62 ± 1.190.993
NEU % (mean ± SD)57.41 ± 7.9855.58 ± 9.290.895
ALT (U/L, mean ± SD)26.81 ± 9.6322.99 ± 7.170.637
AST (U/L, mean ± SD)22.28 ± 4.9921.37 ± 4.220.903
AFP (ng/mL, mean ± SD)2.67 ±1.412.97±1.700.901
CEA (ng/mL, mean ± SD)1.95±1.032.32±1.140.859
Glu (mmol/L, mean ± SD)5.33 ± 0.395.19 ± 0.490.966
BUN (mmol/L, mean ± SD)5.51 ± 0.995.31 ± 0.920.952
CREA (μmol/L, mean ± SD)82.27 ± 14.4470.68 ± 11.700.506
UA ((μmol /ml, mean ± SD)463.50 ± 50.76293.39 ± 56.890.009*
TRACP 5b (U/L, mean ± SD)1.47 ± 0.622.62 ± 0.630.000*

WBC refers to white blood cells, NEU refers to neutrophils, ALT refers to alanine aminotransferase, AST refers to aspartate aminotransferase, AFP refers to alpha-fetoprotein, CEA refers to carcinoembryonic antigen, Glu refers to blood glucose, BUN refers to blood urea nitrogen, CREA refers to creatinine, UA refers to uric acid and TRACP 5b refers to tartrate-resistant acid. An independent sample t-test was employed (“*” indicates p<0.05).

Fig 1

Negative correlation between the concentrations of UA and TRACP 5b.

(A) The average TRACP 5b levels of the 77 high-UA individuals (1.47± 0.62 U/L) were significantly lower (t-test, p<0.0001) than that of the 77 healthy subjects (2.62 ± 0.63U/L). (B) The average TRACP 5b levels of the 16 female high-UA individuals (1.51 ± 0.64 U/L) were significantly lower (t-test, p<0.0001) than that of the 16 female healthy subjects (2.73 ± 0.86 U/L). (C) The average TRACP 5b levels of the 61 male high-UA individuals (1.46 ± 0.62 U/L) were significantly lower (t-test, p<0.0001) than that of the 61 male healthy subjects (2.59 ± 0.56 U/L). Triple asterisk indicates p<0.0001.

Fig 2

High concentrations of UA lead to decrease of TRACP 5b levels.

A TRACP 5b standard sample was divided into 6 aliquots. Serial dilutions of UA (250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000μM) were prepared from UA standard subject. The 5 aliquots were then spiked at 3:2 with each UA solution. This generated 5 different test samples with the same TRACP 5b level, whose final UA concentrations ranged from 100 to 1600 μM. An aliquot containing DDW instead of UA served as a blank. The average TRACP 5b concentration is marked with error bars representing standard deviations of three independent experiments.

Fig 3

Derivation of a UA correction equation.

The TRACP 5b concentrations of the six distinct test samples with the same TRACP 5b standard sample and final UA concentrations ranging from 0 to 1600 μM were measured. ΔTRACP 5b means difference of TRACP 5b concentrations measured between the samples of final UA concentrations ranging from 100 to 1600 μM and that of no UA. The average ΔTRACP 5b concentration is marked in figure with error bars representing standard deviations.

Fig 4

Correction of decreased TRACP 5b concentrations resulting from high-UA individuals compared to healthy subjects.

Each high-UA individual's UA-corrected TRACP 5b concentration was calculated based on the UA-TRACP 5b correction equation. Increasing UA concentration means difference value between each high-UA individual's and mean value of healthy subjects’. Triple asterisk indicates p<0.0001. “N.S” indicates no significant difference.

WBC refers to white blood cells, NEU refers to neutrophils, ALT refers to alanine aminotransferase, AST refers to aspartate aminotransferase, AFP refers to alpha-fetoprotein, CEA refers to carcinoembryonic antigen, Glu refers to blood glucose, BUN refers to blood urea nitrogen, CREA refers to creatinine, UA refers to uric acid and TRACP 5b refers to tartrate-resistant acid. An independent sample t-test was employed (“*” indicates p<0.05).

Negative correlation between the concentrations of UA and TRACP 5b.

(A) The average TRACP 5b levels of the 77 high-UA individuals (1.47± 0.62 U/L) were significantly lower (t-test, p<0.0001) than that of the 77 healthy subjects (2.62 ± 0.63U/L). (B) The average TRACP 5b levels of the 16 female high-UA individuals (1.51 ± 0.64 U/L) were significantly lower (t-test, p<0.0001) than that of the 16 female healthy subjects (2.73 ± 0.86 U/L). (C) The average TRACP 5b levels of the 61 male high-UA individuals (1.46 ± 0.62 U/L) were significantly lower (t-test, p<0.0001) than that of the 61 male healthy subjects (2.59 ± 0.56 U/L). Triple asterisk indicates p<0.0001.

High concentrations of UA lead to decrease of TRACP 5b levels.

A TRACP 5b standard sample was divided into 6 aliquots. Serial dilutions of UA (250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000μM) were prepared from UA standard subject. The 5 aliquots were then spiked at 3:2 with each UA solution. This generated 5 different test samples with the same TRACP 5b level, whose final UA concentrations ranged from 100 to 1600 μM. An aliquot containing DDW instead of UA served as a blank. The average TRACP 5b concentration is marked with error bars representing standard deviations of three independent experiments.

Derivation of a UA correction equation.

The TRACP 5b concentrations of the six distinct test samples with the same TRACP 5b standard sample and final UA concentrations ranging from 0 to 1600 μM were measured. ΔTRACP 5b means difference of TRACP 5b concentrations measured between the samples of final UA concentrations ranging from 100 to 1600 μM and that of no UA. The average ΔTRACP 5b concentration is marked in figure with error bars representing standard deviations.

Correction of decreased TRACP 5b concentrations resulting from high-UA individuals compared to healthy subjects.

Each high-UA individual's UA-corrected TRACP 5b concentration was calculated based on the UA-TRACP 5b correction equation. Increasing UA concentration means difference value between each high-UA individual's and mean value of healthy subjects’. Triple asterisk indicates p<0.0001. “N.S” indicates no significant difference.

Conclusion

In this study, by analyzing the collected data and the result of an interference experiment in vitro, we illustrated that the patients with high concentrations of UA presented a false-negative decrease in TRACP 5b. Our results reminded physicians should fully consider interference of hyperuricemia, especially when TRACP 5b was used for early diagnosis of cancer patients with bone metastasis, evaluation of the aggressiveness of osteosarcoma or prediction of survival in prostate cancer and breast cancer with bone metastases.

The data used to make comparisons between 77 high UA and 77 healthy subjects.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  Survival markers related to bone metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  E K Salminen; M J Kallioinen; M A Ala-Houhala; P P Vihinen; S L Tiitinen; M Varpula; T J Vahlberg
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Mechanism of interference by uric acid in the glucose oxidase-peroxidase method for serum glucose.

Authors:  N H Chinh
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Implications of serum bone turnover markers in prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis.

Authors:  Naoto Kamiya; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Masashi Yano; Takumi Endo; Makoto Takano; Atsuhi Komaru; Koji Kawamura; Nobuyuki Sekita; Takashi Imamoto; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Consumption of vitamin D-and calcium-fortified soft white cheese lowers the biochemical marker of bone resorption TRAP 5b in postmenopausal women at moderate risk of osteoporosis fracture.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Bonjour; Valérie Benoit; Brigitte Rousseau; Jean-Claude Souberbielle
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Bone remodeling increases substantially in the years after menopause and remains increased in older osteoporosis patients.

Authors:  Robert Recker; Joan Lappe; K Michael Davies; Robert Heaney
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  A novel immunoassay for the determination of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b from rat serum.

Authors:  Sari L Alatalo; Zhiqi Peng; Anthony J Janckila; Helena Kaija; Pirkko Vihko; H Kalervo Vaananen; Jussi M Halleen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Biology and clinical significance of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatases: new perspectives on an old enzyme.

Authors:  Anthony J Janckila; Lung T Yam
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Increased osteoclast activity is associated with aggressiveness of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Sofia Avnet; Alessandra Longhi; Manuela Salerno; Jussi M Halleen; Francesca Perut; Donatella Granchi; Stefano Ferrari; Franco Bertoni; Armando Giunti; Nicola Baldini
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 10.  Metabolic syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, and colon cancer: a review.

Authors:  Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  4 in total

1.  Positive association between serum uric acid and bone mineral density in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by gender and BMI.

Authors:  Mingxin Xu; Junlei Su; Jie Hao; Ni Zhong; Zhiyin Zhang; Ran Cui; Feng Li; Chunjun Sheng; Ge Zhang; Hui Sheng; Shen Qu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Relationship of Bone Turnover Markers with Serum Uric Acid-to-Creatinine Ratio in Men and Postmenopausal Women with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Yuling Xing; Jing Liu; Huanxin Liu; Huijuan Ma
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.249

3.  The association between the baseline bone resorption marker CTX and incident dysglycemia after 4 years.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Liu; Dong-Mei Liu; Yan Xuan; Lin Zhao; Li-Hao Sun; Dian-Dian Zhao; Xiao-Feng Wang; Yang He; Xing-Zhi Guo; Rui Du; Ji-Qiu Wang; Jian-Min Liu; Hong-Yan Zhao; Bei Tao
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 13.567

4.  High uric acid (UA) downregulates bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) expression through inhibition of its promoter activity.

Authors:  Zhi-Qi Wu; Xiao-Ting Chen; Yan-Yan Xu; Ming-Jie Tian; Hai-Yan Chen; Guo-Ping Zhou; Hua-Guo Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.