| Literature DB >> 26800186 |
Tero I Ala-Kokko1,2, Shivaprakash J Mutt3,4, Sara Nisula5, Juha Koskenkari1,2, Janne Liisanantti1,2, Pasi Ohtonen1,2, Meri Poukkanen6, Jouko J Laurila1,2, Ville Pettilä5, Karl-Heinz Herzig3,4.
Abstract
Introduction Low levels of vitamin D have been associated with increased mortality in patients that are critically ill. This study explored whether vitamin D levels were associated with 90-day mortality in severe sepsis or septic shock. Methods Plasma vitamin D levels were measured on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a prospective multicentre observational study. Results 610 patients with severe sepsis were included; of these, 178 (29%) had septic shock. Vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L) was present in 333 (55%) patients. The 90-day mortality did not differ among patients with or without vitamin D deficiency (28.3% vs. 28.5%, p = 0.789). Diabetes was more common among patients deficient compared to those not deficient in vitamin D (30% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). Hospital-acquired infections at admission were more prevalent in patients with a vitamin D deficiency (31% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). A multivariable adjusted Cox regression model showed that low vitamin D levels could not predict 90-day mortality (<50 nmol/L: hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% CI: 0.72-1.36), p > 0.9; and <25 nmol/L: HR 0.44 (95% CI: 0.22-0.87), p = 0.018). Conclusions Vitamin D deficiency detected upon ICU admission was not associated with 90-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Key messages In severe sepsis and septic shock, a vitamin D deficiency upon ICU admission was not associated with increased mortality. Compared to patients with sufficient vitamin D, patients with deficient vitamin D more frequently exhibited diabetes, elevated C-reactive protein levels, and hospital-acquired infections upon ICU admission, and they more frequently developed acute kidney injury.Entities:
Keywords: Severe sepsis; critical illness; septic shock; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26800186 DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1134807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med ISSN: 0785-3890 Impact factor: 4.709