Ildikó Gágyor1, Wolfgang Himmel1, Andrea Pierau1, Jean-François Chenot2. 1. a Department of General Practice , University Medical Center Göttingen , Göttingen, Germany ; 2. b Department of General Practice , University Medicine Greifswald , Greifswald, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although determinants of place of death have been investigated in several studies, there is a lack of knowledge on factors associated with dying at home from the general practice perspective. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with dying at home for patients in German general practice. METHODS: In a retrospective study, general practitioners of 30 general practices were asked to provide data for all patients aged 18 years or older who died within the last 12 months, using a self-developed questionnaire. 'Dying in hospital' was defined as dying in hospital or hospice and 'dying at home' as dying at one's usual residence including the nursing home. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with 'dying at home'; odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as measures of effect size. RESULTS: Of 439 deceased patients, 52.2% died at home, and 47.8% died in hospital or hospice. Determinants for dying at home were patients' care in the last 48 hours of life by family members (OR: 7.8, 95% CI: 3.4-18.0), by general practitioners (GPs) (OR: 7.3, 4.2-12.9) and living in a nursing home (OR: 3.8, 1.7-8.3). In the adjusted model, low comorbidity was positively associated (OR: 3.2, 1.4-7.0), and low functional health status (Karnofsky performance status) was negatively associated with dying at home (OR: 0.3, 0.1-0.7). CONCLUSION: Apart from patient-related factors such as comorbidity and health status, care by family members and GPs respectively, were determinants of dying at home.
BACKGROUND: Although determinants of place of death have been investigated in several studies, there is a lack of knowledge on factors associated with dying at home from the general practice perspective. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with dying at home for patients in German general practice. METHODS: In a retrospective study, general practitioners of 30 general practices were asked to provide data for all patients aged 18 years or older who died within the last 12 months, using a self-developed questionnaire. 'Dying in hospital' was defined as dying in hospital or hospice and 'dying at home' as dying at one's usual residence including the nursing home. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with 'dying at home'; odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as measures of effect size. RESULTS: Of 439 deceased patients, 52.2% died at home, and 47.8% died in hospital or hospice. Determinants for dying at home were patients' care in the last 48 hours of life by family members (OR: 7.8, 95% CI: 3.4-18.0), by general practitioners (GPs) (OR: 7.3, 4.2-12.9) and living in a nursing home (OR: 3.8, 1.7-8.3). In the adjusted model, low comorbidity was positively associated (OR: 3.2, 1.4-7.0), and low functional health status (Karnofsky performance status) was negatively associated with dying at home (OR: 0.3, 0.1-0.7). CONCLUSION: Apart from patient-related factors such as comorbidity and health status, care by family members and GPs respectively, were determinants of dying at home.
Entities:
Keywords:
Family practice; death; family caregivers; physician-patient relations; terminal care
Authors: Simon Schwill; Dorothee Reith; Tobias Walter; Peter Engeser; Michel Wensing; Elisabeth Flum; Joachim Szecsenyi; Katja Krug Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 3.234