| Literature DB >> 26799743 |
Patricia Hafner1,2, Ulrike Bonati1, Beat Erne3, Maurice Schmid1, Daniela Rubino1, Urs Pohlman1, Thomas Peters4, Erich Rutz5, Stephan Frank6, Cornelia Neuhaus7, Stefanie Deuster8, Monika Gloor9, Oliver Bieri9, Arne Fischmann10, Michael Sinnreich2,3, Nuri Gueven11, Dirk Fischer1,2.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Altered neuronal nitric oxide synthase function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy leads to impaired mitochondrial function which is thought to be one cause of muscle damage in this disease. The study tested if increased intramuscular nitric oxide concentration can improve mitochondrial energy metabolism in Duchenne muscular dystrophy using a novel therapeutic approach through the combination of L-arginine with metformin. Five ambulatory, genetically confirmed Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients aged between 7–10 years were treated with L-arginine (3 x 2.5 g/d) and metformin (2 x 250 mg/d) for 16 weeks. Treatment effects were assessed using mitochondrial protein expression analysis in muscular biopsies, indirect calorimetry, Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, quantitative thigh muscle MRI, and clinical scores of muscle performance. There were no serious side effects and no patient dropped out. Muscle biopsy results showed pre-treatment a significantly reduced mitochondrial protein expression and increased oxidative stress in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients compared to controls. Post-treatment a significant elevation of proteins of the mitochondrial electron transport chain was observed as well as a reduction in oxidative stress. Treatment also decreased resting energy expenditure rates and energy substrate use shifted from carbohydrates to fatty acids. These changes were associated with improved clinical scores. In conclusion pharmacological stimulation of the nitric oxide pathway leads to improved mitochondria function and clinically a slowing of disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This study shall lead to further development of this novel therapeutic approach into a real alternative for Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02516085.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26799743 PMCID: PMC4723144 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study profile according CONSORT flow chart.
Summary of basic characteristics and laboratory data.
| DMD Pretreatment | DMD Posttreatment | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Mean | % | ||
| Age, years | 7.9 | 0.4 | 8.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | - | - |
| Height, m | 1.22 | 0.1 | 1.24 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2% | 0.109 |
| Weight, kg | 22.7 | 3.0 | 22.8 | 3.1 | 0.2 | 1% | 0.104 |
| BMI, kg / m2 | 15.2 | 2.0 | 14.9 | 1.7 | -0.3 | -2% | 0.225 |
| L-arginine, μmol/l | 68 | 25 | 82 | 52 | 14 | 20% | 1.000 |
| L-citrulline, μmol/l | 29 | 10 | 24 | 10 | -5 | -18% | 0.273 |
| L-ornithine, μmol/l | 65 | 19 | 70 | 17 | 5 | 8% | 1.000 |
| GAB | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 26% | 0.465 |
| Urea | 5,5 | 0,8 | 5,4 | 0,5 | -0,1 | -2% | 0.581 |
| ASAT, mmol/l | 297 | 84 | 345 | 106 | 48 | 16% | 0.043 |
| ALAT, mmol/l | 475 | 171 | 582 | 247 | 107 | 23% | 0.225 |
| Creatinekinase, U/l | 11637 | 4085 | 13082 | 3693 | 1445 | 12% | 0.138 |
| Creatinine, μmol/l | 15.2 | 2.9 | 15.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 4% | 0.317 |
| Glucose, mmol/l | 4.7 | 0.2 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2% | 0.705 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/l | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | -0.3 | -25% | 0.109 |
| Cholesterine, mmol/l | 4.1 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 0.8 | -0.1 | -2% | 0.276 |
| HDL cholesterine, mmol/l | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1% | 0.892 |
| LDL cholesterine, mmol/l | 2.4 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1% | 0.893 |
| Adiponectin μg/ml | 7.6 | 4.2 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 3% | 0.498 |
| Leptin μg/l | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 80% | 0.786 |
GAB = global arginine bioavaliability, defined as L-arginine /(L-ornithine + L-citrulline)
*P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Muscle biopsy analysis.
| Pathway | Variable | Control | DMD Pretreatment | DMD Posttreatment | Difference | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | (SEM) | Mean | (SEM) | Mean | (SEM) | Controls vs. DMD Pretreatment | Pretreatment vs. Posttreatment | ||||
| % | % | ||||||||||
| 2.53 | 0.30 | 2.06 | 0.23 | 3.65 | 0.28 | -19% | 0.413 | 58% | 0.068 | ||
| 6.43 | 1.20 | 6.70 | 0.79 | 8.47 | 0.93 | 4% | 0.548 | 26% | 0.043 | ||
| 0.48 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.09 | -58% | 0.029 | 85% | 0.144 | ||
| 2.21 | 0.05 | 1.20 | 0.12 | 1.76 | 0.18 | -46% | 0.029 | 47% | 0.068 | ||
| 2.56 | 0.09 | 1.23 | 0.28 | 2.44 | 0.53 | -52% | 0.029 | 99% | 0.068 | ||
| 2.27 | 0.13 | 1.43 | 0.22 | 2.02 | 0.23 | -37% | 0.029 | 41% | 0.068 | ||
| 45.29 | 17.19 | 179.10 | 15.32 | 145.34 | 10.52 | 296% | 0.016 | -19% | 0.144 | ||
DMD = Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy; cGMP = cyclic guanosinmonophosphat; OXPHOS = oxidative phosphorylation; ROS = reactive oxygen species
*P values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test
**P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Fig 2Muscle biopsy.
Muscle biopsy findings, individual control (C) concentrations and individual DMD changes before (PRE) and after (POST) treatment as well as point estimates with 95% confidence intervals. A = nitrotyrosine ELISA, concentration is provided in nmol / 7.9 μg protein, B = cGMP ELISA, concentration is provided in pmol / 6.4 μg protein, C = western blot succinat oxidoreductase (complex II) / GAPDH ratio, D = western blot cytochrome c oxidoreductase (complex III) / GAPDH ratio, E = western blot cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV) / GAPDH ratio, F = western blot ATP synthase (Complex V) / GAPDH ratio, G = carbonylated protein ELISA (nmol / 1 μg protein).
Summary of indirect calorimetry, DEXA, and muscle MRI data.
| DMD Pretreatment | DMD Posttreatment | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Mean | (%) | ||
| REE, kcal/24 h | 1007 | 135 | 955 | 130 | -52 | -5.4% | 0.068 |
| Relative REE, kcal/24 h/kg muscle | 62.7 | 1.4 | 58.2 | 2.9 | -4.5 | -7.2% | 0.068 |
| Carbohydrate oxidation, % | 68.9 | 18.6 | 51.0 | 2.5 | -17.9% | 0.068 | |
| Carbohydrate oxidation, kcal/kg muscle | 10.2 | 2.6 | 7.1 | 0.1 | -3.2 | -31.1% | 0.068 |
| Fatty acid oxidation, % | 19.9 | 14.4 | 33.8 | 2.6 | 13.9% | 0.109 | |
| Fatty acid oxidation, kcal/kg muscle | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 61.5% | 0.109 |
| Lean Mass, kg | 16.1 | 1.9 | 16.4 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 1.8% | 0.500 |
| Lean Mass of whole body, % | 71.3 | 2.4 | 71.4 | 3.3 | 0.1% | 0.786 | |
| Fat, kg | 5.8 | 1.2 | 5.82 | 1.3 | 0.02 | 0.3% | 0.893 |
| Fat of whole body, % | 25.5 | 2.7 | 25.2 | 3.7 | -0.3% | 0.686 | |
| Quadriceps | 11.9 | 5.8 | 13.2 | 6.6 | 1.3% | 0.080 | |
| all thigh muscles | 14.0 | 5.7 | 15.5 | 6.8 | 1.5% | 0.080 | |
| Quadriceps | 4149 | 1331 | 4352 | 1686 | 203 | 4.9% | 0.500 |
| all thigh muscles | 8106 | 2201 | 8611 | 2628 | 505 | 6.2% | 0.345 |
REE = Resting Energy Expenditure; DEXA = Dual-Energy X-Ray absorptiometry; 2PD = two point Dixon method; MFF = muscle fat fraction
*P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Fig 3Indirect calorimetry.
Indirect calorimetry results demonstrating consistently decreased rates of resting energy expenditure per kg muscle in 24 hours (A), reduced usage of carbohydrates as oxidative fuel (B), and increased usages of fatty acids (C) in oxidative energy metabolism.
Summary of clinical data.
| DMD Pretreatment | DMD Posttreatment | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Mean | (%) | ||
| 149.6 | 55.11 | 159.2 | 78.1 | 9.6 | 6.4% | 0.498 | |
| Total score, % | 81.0 | 5.4 | 84.6 | 11.9 | 3.6% | 0.414 | |
| D1 Subscore, % | 64.1 | 12.0 | 70.3 | 22.3 | 6.2% | 0.225 | |
| D2 Subscore, % | 96.1 | 2.5 | 97.8 | 5.0 | 1.7% | 0.450 | |
| D3 Subscore, % | 86.7 | 5.2 | 88.6 | 6.4 | 1.9% | 0.593 | |
D1 Subscore = standing and transfers, D2 Subscore = axial and proximal motor capacity, D3 Subscore = distal motor capacity
*P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Fig 4Clinical changes.
Clinical changes over treatment period of 16 weeks are shown. Four of the five patients showed improvements in 2 min walking distance (A), the MFM total score (B) and the MFM D1 subscore (C).