Literature DB >> 26799610

Interactions and relevance of blast percentage and treatment strategy among younger and older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Courtney D DiNardo1, Guillermo Garcia-Manero1, Sherry Pierce1, Aziz Nazha2, Carlos Bueso-Ramos3, Elias Jabbour1, Farhad Ravandi1, Jorge Cortes1, Hagop Kantarjian1.   

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is defined as ≥20% myeloblasts, representing a change from original guidelines where ≤30% blasts were considered as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and 20-29% blasts classified as refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T). Whether the diagnostic bone marrow blast percentage has current value with regards to patient prognostication or identification of optimal treatment strategies is unclear. We retrospectively studied 1652 treatment-naïve adults with MDS or AML and ≥10% blasts from January 2000 to April 2014. Patients with 20-29% blasts were more similar to MDS patients in terms of advanced age, increased frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics, lower WBC count, and less frequent NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. Median overall survival of MDS and RAEB-T were similar, 16.0 and 16.0 months, compared to 13.5 months for AML with ≥30% blasts (P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis showed inferior survival with increased age (HR 1.81 age 60-69, HR 2.68 age ≥70, P < 0.0005); poor-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.25, P < 0.0005); therapy-related disease (HR 1.44, P < 0.0005); and markers of proliferative disease including WBC ≥25 × 10(9) /L (HR 1.35, P = 0.0003), elevated LDH count (HR 1.24, P = 0.0015), and peripheral blasts (HR 1.25, P = 0.004). Among younger patients (≤60 years), intensive AML-type therapy resulted in similar outcomes regardless of blast percentage, suggesting this to be optimal therapy in this context. Among older patients (≥70 years), patients with 20-29% blasts had similar outcomes to patients with <20% blasts, and better than those with ≥30% blasts. In addition, among older patients, epigenetic therapy provided at least equivalent outcome to intensive chemotherapy.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26799610      PMCID: PMC5486407          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  24 in total

1.  Effect of diagnosis (refractory anemia with excess blasts, refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation, or acute myeloid leukemia [AML]) on outcome of AML-type chemotherapy.

Authors:  E Estey; P Thall; M Beran; H Kantarjian; S Pierce; M Keating
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome.

Authors:  Frank G Rücker; Richard F Schlenk; Lars Bullinger; Sabine Kayser; Veronica Teleanu; Helena Kett; Marianne Habdank; Carla-Maria Kugler; Karlheinz Holzmann; Verena I Gaidzik; Peter Paschka; Gerhard Held; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal; Michael Lübbert; Stefan Fröhling; Thorsten Zenz; Jürgen Krauter; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Arnold Ganser; Peter Lichter; Konstanze Döhner; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  FLT3 internal tandem duplication associates with adverse outcome and gene- and microRNA-expression signatures in patients 60 years of age or older with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Authors:  Susan P Whitman; Kati Maharry; Michael D Radmacher; Heiko Becker; Krzysztof Mrózek; Dean Margeson; Kelsi B Holland; Yue-Zhong Wu; Sebastian Schwind; Klaus H Metzeler; Jing Wen; Maria R Baer; Bayard L Powell; Thomas H Carter; Jonathan E Kolitz; Meir Wetzler; Joseph O Moore; Richard M Stone; Andrew J Carroll; Richard A Larson; Michael A Caligiuri; Guido Marcucci; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Current treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Gail J Roboz
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  Age and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Frederick R Appelbaum; Holly Gundacker; David R Head; Marilyn L Slovak; Cheryl L Willman; John E Godwin; Jeanne E Anderson; Stephen H Petersdorf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Peter L Greenberg; John M Bennett; Bob Lowenberg; Pierre W Wijermans; Stephen D Nimer; Antonio Pinto; Miloslav Beran; Theo M de Witte; Richard M Stone; Moshe Mittelman; Guillermo F Sanz; Steven D Gore; Charles A Schiffer; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Elihu Estey; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Nancy Lee Harris; Richard D Brunning
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group.

Authors:  J M Bennett; D Catovsky; M T Daniel; G Flandrin; D A Galton; H R Gralnick; C Sultan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Role of TP53 mutations in the origin and evolution of therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Terrence N Wong; Giridharan Ramsingh; Andrew L Young; Christopher A Miller; Waseem Touma; John S Welch; Tamara L Lamprecht; Dong Shen; Jasreet Hundal; Robert S Fulton; Sharon Heath; Jack D Baty; Jeffery M Klco; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; Timothy J Ley; Todd Druley; Daniel C Link; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Intensive chemotherapy is more effective than hypomethylating agents for the treatment of younger patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and elevated bone marrow blasts.

Authors:  Paolo Strati; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Chong Zhao; Tapan Kadia; Gautam Borthakur; Marina Konopleva; Naval Daver; Courtney D DiNardo; Nicholas J Short; Musa Yilmaz; Kiran Naqvi; Yesid Alvarado; Sherry A Pierce; Jorge Cortes; Carlos Bueso-Ramos; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 2.  "Blasts" in myeloid neoplasms - how do we define blasts and how do we incorporate them into diagnostic schema moving forward?

Authors:  Xueyan Chen; Jonathan R Fromm; Kikkeri N Naresh
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Treatment of Low-Blast Count AML using Hypomethylating Agents.

Authors:  Eleonora De Bellis; Luana Fianchi; Francesco Buccisano; Marianna Criscuolo; Luca Maurillo; Laura Cicconi; Mattia Brescini; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Ambra Di Veroli; Adriano Venditti; Sergio Amadori; William Arcese; Francesco Lo-Coco; Maria Teresa Voso
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.576

4.  Severe atypical herpes zoster as an initial symptom of fatal myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory anemia and blast excess (RAEB II).

Authors:  Uwe Wollina; Gesina Hansel; Anja Baunacke; Georgi Tchernev
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-18

5.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Glasdegib in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies and Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Swan Lin; Naveed Shaik; Giovanni Martinelli; Andrew J Wagner; Jorge Cortes; Ana Ruiz-Garcia
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael Heuser; B Douglas Smith; Walter Fiedler; Mikkael A Sekeres; Pau Montesinos; Brian Leber; Akil Merchant; Cristina Papayannidis; José A Pérez-Simón; Caroline J Hoang; Thomas O'Brien; Weidong Wendy Ma; Mirjana Zeremski; Ashleigh O'Connell; Geoffrey Chan; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 7.  Patterns of undertreatment among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): considerations for patients eligible for non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC).

Authors:  Elizabeth Hubscher; Slaven Sikirica; Timothy Bell; Andrew Brown; Verna Welch; Alexander Russell-Smith; Paul D'Amico
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Comparable outcomes of patients eligible vs ineligible for SWOG leukemia studies.

Authors:  Abby Statler; Megan Othus; Harry P Erba; Thomas R Chauncey; Jerald P Radich; Steven Coutre; Anjali Advani; Sucha Nand; Farhad Ravandi; Sudipto Mukherjee; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 25.476

9.  RNA sequencing-based identification of potential targets in acute myeloid leukemia: A case report.

Authors:  Omar S El-Masry; Ali M Al-Amri; Ahlam Alqatari; Khaldoon Alsamman
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2020-08-27

10.  Imidazo[1,2-b]pyrazole-7-Carboxamide Derivative Induces Differentiation-Coupled Apoptosis of Immature Myeloid Cells Such as Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells.

Authors:  Edit Kotogány; József Á Balog; Lajos I Nagy; Róbert Alföldi; Valeria Bertagnolo; Federica Brugnoli; András Demjén; Anita K Kovács; Péter Batár; Gabriella Mezei; Renáta Szabó; Iván Kanizsai; Csaba Varga; László G Puskás; Gábor J Szebeni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.