Literature DB >> 26799360

In vitro cleaning potential of three implant debridement methods. Simulation of the non-surgical approach.

Valerie Ronay1, Andrea Merlini1, Thomas Attin1, Patrick R Schmidlin1, Philipp Sahrmann1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cleaning potential of commonly used implant debridement methods, simulating non-surgical peri-implantitis therapy in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred-and-eighty dental implants were ink-stained and mounted in combined soft and hard tissue models, representing peri-implantitis defects with angulations of 30, 60, and 90° covered by a custom-made artificial mucosa. Implants were treated by a dental school graduate and a board-certified periodontist for 120 s with following instruments: Gracey curette, ultrasonic scaler, and an air powder abrasive device with a nozzle for sub-mucosal use utilizing glycine powder. All procedures were repeated 10 times for each instrumentation and defect morphology respectively. Images of the implant surface were taken. Areas with color remnants were planimetrically determined and their cumulative surface area was calculated. Results were tested for statistical differences using two-way anova and Bonferroni correction. Micro-morphologic surface changes were analyzed on scanning electron microscope (SEM) images.
RESULTS: The areas of uncleaned surfaces (%, mean ± standard deviations) for curettes, ultrasonic tips, and air abrasion accounted for 74.70 ± 4.89%, 66.95 ± 8.69% and 33.87 ± 12.59% respectively. The air powder abrasive device showed significantly better results for all defect angulations (P < 0.0001). SEM evaluation displayed considerable surface alterations after instrumentation with Gracey curettes and ultrasonic devices, whereas glycine powder did not result in any surface alterations.
CONCLUSION: A complete surface cleaning could not be achieved regardless of the instrumentation method applied. The air powder abrasive device showed a superior cleaning potential for all defect angulations with better results at wide defects.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peri-implantitis; air-flow; debridement; non-surgical

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26799360     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  19 in total

1.  Effect of a single initial phase of non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: Abrasive air polishing versus ultrasounds. A prospective randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Amparo Aloy-Prósper; Hilario Pellicer-Chover; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-10-01

2.  [Efficacy of combined application of glycine powder air-polishing in non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases].

Authors:  F Sun; S Q Li; Y P Wei; J S Zhong; C Wang; W J Hu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-02-18

3.  Photoacoustic removal of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms from titanium surface with an Er:YAG laser using super short pulses.

Authors:  Saša Terlep; Michaela Hympanova; Iztok Dogsa; Franja Pajk; David Stopar
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy.

Authors:  Valerie Steiger-Ronay; Andrea Merlini; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Patrick R Schmidlin; Thomas Attin; Philipp Sahrmann
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Potential Causes of Titanium Particle and Ion Release in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rafael Delgado-Ruiz; Georgios Romanos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Philipp Sahrmann; Fabienne Gilli; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin; Lamprini Karygianni
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-01

7.  Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement.

Authors:  Philipp Sahrmann; Sophie Winkler; Andrea Gubler; Thomas Attin
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  The effect of standoff distance and surface roughness on biofilm disruption using cavitation.

Authors:  N Vyas; R L Sammons; S A Kuehne; C Johansson; V Stenport; Q X Wang; A D Walmsley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biofilm Removal and Bacterial Re-Colonization Inhibition of a Novel Erythritol/Chlorhexidine Air-Polishing Powder on Titanium Disks.

Authors:  Magda Mensi; Andrea Cochis; Annamaria Sordillo; Francesca Uberti; Lia Rimondini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Simulated damage of two implant debridement methods: Nonsurgical approach with Teflon and stainless steel hand scalers.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Dimas Renno de Lima; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.