| Literature DB >> 26798561 |
Mariam Aziz1, Fareeha Mahmood2, Mariana Mata2, Helen G Durkin3, Chenglong Liu4, Ruth M Greenblatt5, Marek Nowicki6, Elizabeth T Golub7, Kathryn Anastos8, Audrey L French1, Linda L Baum2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We measured antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity in serum and genital fluids of heterosexually exposed women during HIV seroconversion.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity; HIV; Seroconverters; Women
Year: 2015 PMID: 26798561 PMCID: PMC4718584 DOI: 10.4172/2155-6113.1000479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J AIDS Clin Res
Figure 1IgG mediated ADCC activity at early and late visits among eleven seroconverters. Paired serum and cervical lavage fluid (CVL) samples were evaluated for ADCC activity against gp120-labeled CEM. NKR at four ten-fold serial dilutions and at a 40:1 effector: target (E: T) ratio in a standard 4-hour 51Cr-release assay. Bar graphs represent % specific release (% SR) values after NK (no antibody) background was subtracted. ADCC activity is shown at early visits (<2 years after seroconversion) in (A) Serum samples and (B) CVL samples. On the right panel, ADCC activity is shown at late visits (≥3 years after seroconversion) in (C) Serum samples and (D) CVL samples.
Figure 2Development of serum and CVL ADCC antibodies following seroconversion. Longitudinal serum and cervical lavage fluid (CVL) samples from 11 individuals were evaluated and compared for ADCC activity over time at their ADCC peak antibody dilution in a standard 4-hr 51Cr-release assay. On the X-axis, 0 years indicates time of seroconversion. Plotted symbol/lines represent the % specific release value after NK (no antibody) background was subtracted for each subject. The difference in development of ADCC activity over time is shown in (A) serum samples and (B) paired CVL samples.
Figure 3Representative samples illustrating contrasting patterns of development of ADCC antibodies following seroconversion. Paired serum and cervical lavage fluid (CVL) samples were evaluated for ADCC activity against gp120-labeled CEM. NKR at four, ten-fold serial dilutions and at 40:1 effector: target (E:T) ratio in a standard 4-hour 51Cr-release assay. Bar graphs represent % specific release (% SR) values after NK (no antibody) background was subtracted. (A) Representative sample with neither serum nor CVL ADCC activity over time. (B) Representative sample showing ADCC activity present in serum only. (C) Representative sample showing ADCC activity acquired over time in CVL only. (D) Representative sample showing ADCC activity in both serum and CVL samples. Note that for subject #5 (in D), no visit samples were available between 2.5 and 6 years after seroconversion.
Figure 4Specificity of ADCC activity in one subject who had unsual serum and CVL ADCC activity at time of seroconversion. Paired serum and cervical lavage fluid (CVL) samples from one subject were evaluated for specificity of ADCC activity at early and late visits following seroconversion. ADCC activity against gp120-labeled or antigen-unlabeled CEM. NKR targets was assessed at four, ten-fold serial dilutions and at a 40:1 effector: target (E:T) ratio in a standard 4-hour 51Cr-release assay. Bar graphs represent % specific release (% SR) values after NK (no antibody) background was subtracted. (A) Serovonverter ADCC activity against gp120-labeled targets is shown for serum samples and (B) corresponding CVL samples over time. On the right, ADCC activity against antigen unlabeled-targets is shown for the subject’s (C) serum samples and (D) corresponding CVL samples.