Literature DB >> 26798481

Improvement in kidney transplantation in the Balkans after the Istanbul Declaration: where do we stand today?

Goce Spasovski1, Mirela Busic2, Francis Delmonico3.   

Abstract

Due to the limited access to kidney transplantation (KTx) in developing countries, desperate patients have engaged in the purchase and sale of kidneys. In 2004, the World Health Assembly urged member states to protect the poor and vulnerable from being exploited through practices of illegal organ trafficking that had become widespread throughout the world. In 2008, the international transplant community convened a summit of transplant professionals, legal experts and ethicists to combat organ trafficking, transplant tourism and transplant commercialism that resulted in the Declaration of Istanbul (DOI). The South-Eastern Europe Health Network (SEEHN) represents a nine country multigovernmental collaboration on health systems. The Regional Health Development Centre on Organ Donation and Transplant Medicine (RHDC) was established in 2011 in Croatia to facilitate cooperation among south-eastern European countries to improve organ transplantation within the Balkan region. Since 2011, a collaboration between the RHDC, the Custodian Group of the DOI (DICG) and SEEHN professionals has enhanced strategic planning and definition of country-specific action plan priorities on organ donation and transplantation. Data of kidney transplantation provided in this report show a significant increase in transplantation activities in a 4-year period in Macedonia, Moldova, Bosnia and Hercegovina, Romania and Montenegro. The success of the donation and transplantation programmes was influenced by the engagement of key professionals and the establishment of organizational infrastructure with the implementation of an appropriate funding model. In conclusion, the DOI has provided an ethical framework for engagement of health professionals from south-eastern European countries. The newly established SEEHN RHDC as a technical coordinating body greatly contributed in building institutional capacity and strengthening regional collaboration between health authorities and professionals within these countries for improvement of transplant activities in the Balkans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Declaration of Istanbul; SEE Health Network; deceased donation; kidney transplantation; living donation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26798481      PMCID: PMC4720195          DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfv116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Kidney J        ISSN: 2048-8505


Introduction

Although kidney transplantation (KTx) has emerged as the best treatment option for improving the quality of life and survival of end-stage renal disease patients [1], various organizational, political, ethical and socio-economic obstacles have prevented its widespread use in developing countries [2]. Due to the organ shortage and limited access to KTx, desperate patients have sought illicit alternative ways of undergoing transplantation that entails the purchase and sale of kidneys [3]. Therefore, the unethical practice of transplant commercialism has been identified as one of the major concerns of health professionals in some of the Balkan countries where deceased and even living donor transplantation have not been sufficiently developed [4]. It has become evident that some patients who have undergone kidney transplantation in Pakistan, China, India and Egypt have returned to their home countries with life-threatening complications arising from the transmission of infectious disease from the donor [5, 6].

Response of the international transplant community

The international transplant community responded to the 2004 World Health Assembly resolution that urged member states to protect the poor and vulnerable from organ trafficking by convening a summit of professionals, ethicists, legal scholars and social scientists in Istanbul in 2008. The resulting Declaration of Istanbul (DOI) has been widely disseminated in medical journals and on the web (see http://www.declarationofistanbul.org/) and endorsed by >125 professional organizations and governmental entities throughout the world [7]. The DOI has become a seminal reference document for professionals in the field of organ donation and transplantation to combat organ trafficking, transplant tourism and transplant commercialism. The DOI is further promulgated by a Declaration of Istanbul Custodian Group (DICG) through writings in the medical literature, and by the engagement of professional organizations and governmental ministries of health to conduct ethically proper practices of transplantation around the world. Thus, with a global DICG effort, substantial progress has been made in countries such as China, Israel and the Philippines that have been either the source of transplant tourists or the source of donor organs for trafficking [8]. The DICG has also collaborated with the World Health Organization to condemn the buying of human body parts for transplantation and the exploitation of the poorest and most vulnerable populations and the human trafficking that results from such practices [9]. In view of the Madrid Resolution, the Declaration of Istanbul and the 63rd World Health Assembly Resolution, a new paradigm of national self-sufficiency has been established. Thus, each country or region should strive to provide a sufficient number of organs from within its own population, guided by WHO ethics principles [10].

South-Eastern Europe Health Network initiative on organ donation and transplantation

The South-Eastern Europe Health Network (SEEHN) is a multi-governmental collaboration on health systems comprised of healthcare professionals from Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania and Serbia. A memorandum of understanding was signed by the SEEHN Ministers of Health in 2009 to utilize regional health development centres in transforming regional projects into long-term programmes of cooperation among the participating SEEHN countries. The Regional Health Development Centre on Organ Donation and Transplant Medicine (RHDC) was established in 2011 in Croatia to facilitate collaboration in deceased organ donation and transplantation, consistent with the Declaration of Istanbul and WHO guiding principles. Since 2011, a collaboration between the RHDC, DICG and SEEHN professionals has enhanced joint efforts to address major obstacles and challenges in organ donation and transplantation within the Balkan region. This collaboration has also been effective in the identification of national focal points and engagement of health authorities in preparation and implementation of country-specific action plans on organ donation and transplantation for each SEEHN country [11, 12]. The landmark meeting, held in May 2011 in Skopje, Macedonia, enabled the first official exchange of data and experience among SEEHN countries. It also revealed the substantial disparity among SEEHN countries in their capacity to meet patients' needs for transplantation [13]. Namely, in most of the countries (except Croatia and Slovenia) the number of kidney transplants performed annually was lagging far behind the need for renal replacement therapy, rendering patients susceptible to transplant tourism and transplant commercialism [5, 14, 15]. The lack of highly trained transplant coordinators and proper organizational infrastructure (i.e. competent authority/national transplant organization), funding model, sustained public education and a computerized system for waiting list management and organ allocation have been identified as the most common and critical obstacles to achieve self-sufficient transplant systems. In the period 2011–15 the RHDC Croatia has conducted regional meetings, training and multicountry workshops (e.g. on donor management, brain death determination, waiting list management, funding models, transplant procurement management, etc.). These educational activities have encompassed training for health professionals (nephrologists, surgeons, anaesthesiologists and others involved into the transplant process) designed to address topics according to country-specific needs, meetings with healthcare and insurance authorities and development of models of collaboration. Such a model has led to the development of kidney transplant programmes in Montenegro. The multicountry workshops have been supported by the Technical Assistance and Information Exchange instrument of the European Commission.

Improved kidney transplant programmes in SEEHN countries

In the period from 2011 to 2014 kidney transplant programmes have been significantly improved in five of the SEEHN countries (Table 1). Living donor kidney transplant programmes have been successfully launched in Montenegro and Moldova. Already established living kidney transplant programmes in Macedonia [16], Bosnia and Hercegovina, Albania and Romania have been markedly improved. Kidney transplant programmes from deceased donors were established for the first time in Montenegro and Moldova. At the same time, the number of kidney transplants from deceased donors in Romania, Macedonia and Bulgaria increased due to an increase in the number of deceased donors [17]. An increase in the number of trained and committed multidisciplinary transplant teams, governmental support with updates in the legislation where appropriate, establishment of national coordinative bodies, training of hospital coordinators and raising public awareness have contributed in achieving these goals (Table 2).
Table 1.

Number of kidney transplants [LD/DD] and per million population in SEEHN countries

Countrya20102011201220132014
MK12 (5.7)6 (2.9)12 (5.7)35 (16.7)40 [28/12] (19)
ME002 (3.2)9 (8/1) (14.3)9 (14.3)
MD01 (0.3)4 (1.1)9 (2.5)17 (6/11) (4.7)
AL12 (4.3)9 (3.2)7 (2.5)9 (3.2)15 (5.4)
RO167 [97/70] (83.5)160 [83/77] (83)138 [73/65] (69)200 [68/132] (100)212 [72/140] (106)
BA Fed.15 [1/14] (6.3)16 (6.7)18 [16/2] (7.5)18 [17/1] (7.5)25 [21/4] (10.4)
BG35 [14/21] (4.8)16 [12/4] (2.2)13 [11/2] (1.8)21 [11/10] (2.9)35 [13/22] (4.8)
RS71 [33/38] (9.9)57 [31/26] (7.9)60 [32/28] (8.3)71 [30/41] (9.9)50 [28/22] (6.9)
HR149 [22/127](34.7)156 [12/144](36.3)160 [13/147](37.2)142 [4/138] (33.0)158 [12/146] (36.7)

LD/DD, living donation/deceased donation.

aCountry codes: AL, Albania; BA Fed., Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; BG, Bulgaria; HR, Croatia; MK, Macedonia; MD, Moldova; ME, Montenegro; RO, Romania; RS, Serbia.

Table 2.

Data on major political, legislative, medical and educational initiatives adopted in the SEEHN countries

InitiativesAlbaniaBA Fed.BulgariaMontenegroCroatiaMacedoniaMoldovaRomaniaSerbia
National transplant coordinatorYYYYYYYYY
Hospital transplant coordinatorNYYYYYYYY
Brain death legislationYYYYYYYYY
Allocation rulesNAYYYYYYYY
Public educationNYYPart.YPart.YPart.Y
Training of transplant doctors (surgeons and nephrologists)NPart.YPart.YYYYPart.
Allocated funds for deceased donationNANNNYYNNY

BA Fed., Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; NA, not applicable; Y, yes; N, no; Part., partially.

Number of kidney transplants [LD/DD] and per million population in SEEHN countries LD/DD, living donation/deceased donation. aCountry codes: AL, Albania; BA Fed., Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; BG, Bulgaria; HR, Croatia; MK, Macedonia; MD, Moldova; ME, Montenegro; RO, Romania; RS, Serbia. Data on major political, legislative, medical and educational initiatives adopted in the SEEHN countries BA Fed., Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; NA, not applicable; Y, yes; N, no; Part., partially. In Table 2 we have summarized the major political, legislative, medical and educational initiatives adopted to improve kidney transplant programmes in SEEHN countries. Nevertheless, there is a need for further action to increase the number of transplantations (both from living and deceased donors), adopting uniform standards in transplant clinical practice and working towards implementation of a paired kidney transplant programme in order to reduce the number of dialysis patients and those on waiting lists (Table 3).
Table 3.

Demographic, economic and data on dialysis and wait listed patients for kidney transplantation in SEEHN countries

Data at end 2014AlbaniaBA Fed.BulgariaMontenegroCroatiaMacedoniaMoldovaRomaniaSerbia
aPopulation (million inhabitants)2.82.47.30.634.32.13.620.07.2
aGDP (US$ per capita)4.7008.3007.5007.10013.6004.8002.3009.5006.400
Patients included on the WL2039157212264026739108
Total patients ever active on WL25230110667356184534015821
Patients awaiting a transplant (active)2522799857117184424015618
Patients on WL died during 20140Not known40282224Not known
Total Tx number—all combinations included77568197411032079
Patients on dialysis (HD + PD)810227833 (est.)1842658137054710 000 (est.)4815

BA Fed., Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; GDP, gross domestic product; WL waiting list; Tx, treatment; HD, hemodialysis; PD, peritoneral dialysis; est., estimated.

aData on inhabitants per country and GDP per capita obtained for 2013 from World Bank and United Nations data.

Demographic, economic and data on dialysis and wait listed patients for kidney transplantation in SEEHN countries BA Fed., Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; GDP, gross domestic product; WL waiting list; Tx, treatment; HD, hemodialysis; PD, peritoneral dialysis; est., estimated. aData on inhabitants per country and GDP per capita obtained for 2013 from World Bank and United Nations data. In conclusion, the DOI has provided an proper ethical framework for engagement of health professionals from south-eastern European countries who have played a key role in the implementation of action plan priorities, specifically addressing the need for national self-sufficiency in organ donation and transplantation in their respective countries. The newly established (SEEHN) RHDC as a technical coordinating body greatly contributed in building institutional capacity and strengthening regional collaboration between health authorities and professionals within these countries for improvement of transplant activities in the Balkans.

Authors' contribution

G.S.: designed the paper, analysed data and wrote the paper. M.B.: collected and analysed data, led the project and wrote the paper. F.D.: supported the project and wrote the paper.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.
  13 in total

Review 1.  The Declaration of Istanbul--early impact and future potential.

Authors:  Gabriel M Danovitch; Mustafa Al-Mousawi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  A call for government accountability to achieve national self-sufficiency in organ donation and transplantation.

Authors:  Francis L Delmonico; Beatriz Domínguez-Gil; Rafael Matesanz; Luc Noel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Third WHO Global Consultation on Organ Donation and Transplantation: striving to achieve self-sufficiency, March 23–25, 2010, Madrid, Spain.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  South East European Health Network Initiative for Organ Donation and Transplantation.

Authors:  Mirela Bušić; Goce Spasovski; Victor Zota; Igor Codreanu; Lada Sarajlić; Maryana Simeonova; Nenad Milojičić; Igor Nikolov; Tamar Ashkenazi; Vjollca Durro; Francis L Delmonico
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The success of South-eastern Europe Health Network (SEEHN) initiative on improvement of the kidney transplant program--facts about Macedonia.

Authors:  Goce Spasovski; Maja Mojsova-Miovska; Jelka Masin-Spasovska
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.782

6.  Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; V B Ashby; E L Milford; A O Ojo; R E Ettenger; L Y Agodoa; P J Held; F K Port
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Kidney transplantation in emerging countries: do we know all issues?

Authors:  G Spasovski; R Vanholder
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.720

8.  Living-unrelated (paid) renal transplantation--ten years later.

Authors:  N Ivanovski; Z Popov; K Cakalaroski; J Masin; G Spasovski; K Zafirovska
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  The improvement in kidney transplant program in R. Macedonia--what are the clues?

Authors:  Goce Spasovski; Saso Dohcev; Oliver Stankov; Sotir Stavridis; Skender Saidi; Aleksandar Josifov; Jelka Masin-Spasovska
Journal:  Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki)       Date:  2013

10.  Pyelo-ureteral necrosis after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Goce B Spasovski; Jelka Masin-Spasovska; Sotir Stavridis; Skender Saiti; Ljupco Lekovski
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nephrology in Bosnia and Herzegovina: impact of the 1992-95 war.

Authors:  Enisa Mesic; Mirna Aleckovic-Halilovic; Denijal Tulumovic; Senaid Trnacevic
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2018-11-13

2.  Chronic Kidney Disease and Nephrology Care in People Living with HIV in Central/Eastern Europe and Neighbouring Countries-Cross-Sectional Analysis from the ECEE Network.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Matłosz; Agata Skrzat-Klapaczyńska; Sergii Antoniak; Tatevik Balayan; Josip Begovac; Gordana Dragovic; Denis Gusev; Djordje Jevtovic; David Jilich; Kerstin Aimla; Botond Lakatos; Raimonda Matulionyte; Aleksandr Panteleev; Antonios Papadopoulos; Nino Rukhadze; Dalibor Sedláček; Milena Stevanovic; Anna Vassilenko; Antonija Verhaz; Nina Yancheva; Oleg Yurin; Andrzej Horban; Justyna D Kowalska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.