Literature DB >> 26797964

A comparative study of human exposures to household air pollution from commonly used cookstoves in Sri Lanka.

R Chartier1, M Phillips1, P Mosquin1, M Elledge1, K Bronstein1, S Nandasena2, V Thornburg1, J Thornburg1, C Rodes1.   

Abstract

Solid fuel burning cookstoves are a major source of household air pollution (HAP) and a significant environmental health risk in Sri Lanka. We report results of the first field study in Sri Lanka to include direct measurements of both real-time indoor concentrations and personal exposures of fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) in households using the two most common stove types in Sri Lanka. A purposive sample of 53 households was selected in the rural community of Kopiwatta in central Sri Lanka, roughly balanced for stove type (traditional or improved 'Anagi') and ventilation (chimney present or absent). At each household, 48-h continuous real-time measurements of indoor kitchen PM2.5 and personal (primary cook) PM2.5 concentrations were measured using the RTI MicroPEM™ personal exposure monitor. Questionnaires were used to collect data related to household demographics, characteristics, and self-reported health symptoms. All primary cooks were female and of an average age of 47 years, with 66% having completed primary education. Median income was slightly over half the national median monthly income. Use of Anagi stoves was positively associated with a higher education level of the primary cook (P = 0.026), although not associated with household income (P = 0.18). The MicroPEM monitors were well-received by participants, and this study's valid data capture rate exceeded 97%. Participant wearing compliance during waking hours was on average 87.2% on Day 1 and 83.3% on Day 2. Periods of non-compliance occurred solely during non-cooking times. The measured median 48-h average indoor PM2.5 concentration for households with Anagi stoves was 64 μg/m3 if a chimney was present and 181 μg/m3 if not. For households using traditional stoves, these values were 70 μg/m3 if a chimney was present and 371 μg/m3 if not. Overall, measured indoor PM2.5 concentrations ranged from a minimum of 33 μg/m3 to a maximum of 940 μg/m3 , while personal exposure concentrations ranged from 34 to 522 μg/m3 . Linear mixed effects modeling of the dependence of indoor concentrations on stove type and presence or absence of chimney showed a significant chimney effect (65% reduction; P < 0.001) and an almost significant stove effect (24% reduction; P = 0.054). Primary cooks in households without chimneys were exposed to substantially higher levels of HAP than those in households with chimneys, while exposures in households with traditional stoves were moderately higher than those with improved Anagi stoves. As expected, simultaneously measuring both indoor concentrations and personal exposure levels indicate significant exposure misclassification bias will likely result from the use of a stationary monitor as a proxy for personal exposure. While personal exposure monitoring is more complex and expensive than deploying simple stationary devices, the value an active personal PM monitor like the MicroPEM adds to an exposure study should be considered in future study designs.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure assessment; Household air pollution; Improved cookstoves; Particulate matter exposure; Personal exposure; Sri Lanka

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26797964     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  23 in total

1.  The home air in agriculture pediatric intervention (HAPI) trial: Rationale and methods.

Authors:  Erin E Masterson; Lisa B Younglove; Adriana Perez; Elizabeth Torres; Jennifer E Krenz; Maria I Tchong French; Anne M Riederer; Paul D Sampson; Nervana Metwali; Esther Min; Karen L Jansen; Gino Aisenberg; Ryan S Babadi; Stephanie A Farquhar; Peter S Thorne; Catherine J Karr
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Miniaturizing Wet Scrubbers for Aerosolized Droplet Capture.

Authors:  Ulri N Lee; Tammi L van Neel; Fang Yun Lim; Jian Wei Khor; Jiayang He; Ravi S Vaddi; Angelo Q W Ong; Anthony Tang; Jean Berthier; John S Meschke; Igor V Novosselov; Ashleigh B Theberge; Erwin Berthier
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 8.008

3.  Differences in Fine Particle Exposure and Estimated Pulmonary Ventilation Rate with Respect to Work Tasks of Wildland Firefighters at Prescribed Burns: A Repeated Measures Study.

Authors:  Anna M Adetona; Olorunfemi Adetona; Ryan T Chartier; Michael H Paulsen; Christopher D Simpson; Stephen L Rathbun; Luke P Naeher
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.779

4.  Household Air Pollution Concentrations after Liquefied Petroleum Gas Interventions in Rural Peru: Findings from a One-Year Randomized Controlled Trial Followed by a One-Year Pragmatic Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Magdalena Fandiño-Del-Rio; Josiah L Kephart; Kendra N Williams; Timothy Shade; Temi Adekunle; Kyle Steenland; Luke P Naeher; Lawrence H Moulton; Gustavo F Gonzales; Marilu Chiang; Shakir Hossen; Ryan T Chartier; Kirsten Koehler; William Checkley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 11.035

5.  Differential exposure and acute health impacts of inhaled solid-fuel emissions from rudimentary and advanced cookstoves in female CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Eugene A Gibbs-Flournoy; M Ian Gilmour; Mark Higuchi; James Jetter; Ingrid George; Lisa Copeland; Randy Harrison; Virginia C Moser; Janice A Dye
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Possible Mediation by Methylation in Acute Inflammation Following Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution.

Authors:  Cuicui Wang; Renjie Chen; Min Shi; Jing Cai; Jingjin Shi; Changyuan Yang; Huichu Li; Zhijing Lin; Xia Meng; Cong Liu; Yue Niu; Yongjie Xia; Zhuohui Zhao; Haidong Kan; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Personal Exposure to PM2.5 Black Carbon and Aerosol Oxidative Potential using an Automated Microenvironmental Aerosol Sampler (AMAS).

Authors:  Casey Quinn; Daniel D Miller-Lionberg; Kevin J Klunder; Jaymin Kwon; Elizabeth M Noth; John Mehaffy; David Leith; Sheryl Magzamen; S Katharine Hammond; Charles S Henry; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  Household air pollution and its effects on health.

Authors:  Komalkirti Apte; Sundeep Salvi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-28

9.  Development and evaluation of an ultrasonic personal aerosol sampler.

Authors:  J Volckens; C Quinn; D Leith; J Mehaffy; C S Henry; D Miller-Lionberg
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.770

10.  Sri Lanka Pilot Study to Examine Respiratory Health Effects and Personal PM2.5 Exposures from Cooking Indoors.

Authors:  Michael J Phillips; Emily A Smith; Paul L Mosquin; Ryan Chartier; Sumal Nandasena; Katherine Bronstein; Myles F Elledge; Vanessa Thornburg; Jonathan Thornburg; Linda M Brown
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.