Literature DB >> 26797893

The Sooner the Better? How Symptom Interval Correlates With Outcome in Children and Adolescents With Solid Tumors: Regression Tree Analysis of the Findings of a Prospective Study.

Andrea Ferrari1, Salvatore Lo Vullo2, Daniele Giardiello2, Laura Veneroni1, Chiara Magni1, Carlo Alfredo Clerici1,3, Stefano Chiaravalli1, Michela Casanova1, Roberto Luksch1, Monica Terenziani1, Filippo Spreafico1, Cristina Meazza1, Serena Catania1, Elisabetta Schiavello1, Veronica Biassoni1, Marta Podda1, Luca Bergamaschi1, Nadia Puma1, Maura Massimino1, Luigi Mariani2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential impact of diagnostic delays on patients' outcomes is a debated issue in pediatric oncology and discordant results have been published so far. We attempted to tackle this issue by analyzing a prospective series of 351 consecutive children and adolescents with solid malignancies using innovative statistical tools.
METHODS: To address the nonlinear complexity of the association between symptom interval and overall survival (OS), a regression tree algorithm was constructed with sequential binary splitting rules and used to identify homogeneous patient groups vis-à-vis functional relationship between diagnostic delay and OS.
RESULTS: Three different groups were identified: group A, with localized disease and good prognosis (5-year OS 85.4%); group B, with locally or regionally advanced, or metastatic disease and intermediate prognosis (5-year OS 72.9%), including neuroblastoma, Wilms tumor, non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma, and germ cell tumor; and group C, with locally or regionally advanced, or metastatic disease and poor prognosis (5-year OS 45%), including brain tumors, rhabdomyosarcoma, and bone sarcoma. The functional relationship between symptom interval and mortality risk differed between the three subgroups, there being no association in group A (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96), a positive linear association in group B (HR: 1.48), and a negative linear association in group C (HR: 0.61).
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that at least a subset of patients can benefit from an earlier diagnosis in terms of survival. For others, intrinsic aggressiveness may mask the potential effect of diagnostic delays. Based on these findings, early diagnosis should remain a goal for pediatric cancer patients.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; cancer; children; diagnostic delay; outcome; symptom interval

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26797893     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  10 in total

1.  Metastatic cancer masquerading as miliary tuberculosis in an immunocompetent young adult.

Authors:  Peng Yun Ng; Mustafa Kadam; Craig Batista
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Management and outcome of children and adolescents with non-medulloblastoma CNS embryonal tumors in Spain: room for improvement in standards of care.

Authors:  Teresa de Rojas; Francisco Bautista; Miguel Flores; Lucía Igual; Raquel Rubio; Eduardo Bardón; Lucía Navarro; Laura Murillo; Raquel Hladun; Adela Cañete; Miguel Garcia-Ariza; Carmen Garrido; Ana Fernández-Teijeiro; Eduardo Quiroga; Carlota Calvo; Anna Llort; Inmaculada de Prada; Luis Madero; Ofelia Cruz; Lucas Moreno
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  The Role of Time as a Prognostic Factor in Pediatric Brain Tumors: a Multivariate Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Eduardo Javier Barragán-Pérez; Carlos Enrique Altamirano-Vergara; Daniel Eduardo Alvarez-Amado; Juan Carlos García-Beristain; Fernando Chico-Ponce-de-León; Vicente González-Carranza; Luis Juárez-Villegas; Chiharu Murata
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  Diagnostic timeliness in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort.

Authors:  Annie Herbert; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Jeremy Whelan; Rachel M Taylor; Julie Barber; Faith Gibson; Lorna A Fern
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-03

5.  Population-Based Analysis of Demographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Pediatric CNS Cancer Survival in the United States.

Authors:  Robert Fineberg; Shadi Zahedi; Megan Eguchi; Muriel Hart; Myles Cockburn; Adam L Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Delay in diagnosis of primary osteosarcoma of bone in children: Have we improved in the last 15 years and what is the impact of delay on diagnosis?

Authors:  Shinichirou Yoshida; James Celaire; Chloe Pace; Charles Taylor; Yoichi Kaneuchi; Scott Evans; Adesegun Abudu
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.072

7.  An Audit of Delays in the Management of Non-Metastatic Osteosarcoma at a Tertiary Care Center in South India.

Authors:  Gipson Samuel; Aashish Yadav; Prabu Mounisamy; Smita Kayal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-07

8.  Determinants of survival of common childhood cancers in Iran.

Authors:  Aliasghar Keramatinia; Maryam Mohseny; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi; Esmat Davoudi Monfared; Farzaneh Amanpour; Ayad Bahadori Monfared; Parastoo Amiri; Maryam Khayamzadeh; Tahereh Alsadat Khoshbin Khoshnazar; Hojjat-Allah Abbaszadeh; Azim Mehrvar; Zeinab Mazloumi; Abolfazl Movafagh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 9.  Gynecological cancer among adolescents and young adults (AYA).

Authors:  Silvia Triarico; Michele Antonio Capozza; Stefano Mastrangelo; Giorgio Attinà; Palma Maurizi; Antonio Ruggiero
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

10.  A collateral effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: Delayed diagnosis in pediatric solid tumors.

Authors:  Stefano Chiaravalli; Andrea Ferrari; Giovanna Sironi; Giovanna Gattuso; Luca Bergamaschi; Nadia Puma; Elisabetta Schiavello; Veronica Biassoni; Marta Podda; Cristina Meazza; Filippo Spreafico; Michela Casanova; Monica Terenziani; Roberto Luksch; Maura Massimino
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.838

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.