Literature DB >> 26797175

The point-to-point test: A new diagnostic tool for measuring lumbar tactile acuity? Inter and intra-examiner reliability study of pain-free subjects.

Wacław Adamczyk1, Anna Sługocka2, Oskar Saulicz3, Edward Saulicz4.   

Abstract

A two-point discrimination test (TPD) is commonly used to investigate lumbar tactile acuity. However, low inter-examiner reliability and difficulties in execution significantly limit its application. Therefore the aim of this study was to compare the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of a new approach, the point-to-point test (PTP), with the TPD. Twenty-one pain-free subjects attended the inter-examiner stage of the study. Eighteen of them were further recruited into an intra-examiner (reproducibility and repeatability) reliability study. PTP was performed on the three points plotted at the L3 spinal level. Point '0' overlapped with the L3 spinous process, from which points '1' and '2' were horizontally separated by 5 and 10 cm, respectively. Participants manually indicated a point previously touched by the examiner, while the distance (error) was measured. Reliability was determined with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,3). The results revealed good and moderate inter- and intra-examiner reliability at point '1' (ICC2,3 = 0.68-0.84) and good reliability at point '2' (ICC2,3 = 0.84-0.86). At point '0', reliability was moderate to poor (ICC2,3 = 0.13-0.63). TPD was characterised by a poor to moderate level of inter- (ICC2,1 = 0.51; ICC2,3 = 0.56) and intra-examiner reliability (ICC(2,1) = 0.50; ICC2,3 = 0.74). Our findings suggest that PTP is more reliable than TPD at two investigated points at the L3 spinal level. However, further research on PTP validity data is strongly warranted.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body image; Point location; Tactile acuity; Two-point discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26797175     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  5 in total

1.  Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Three Measurements for Assessing Tactile Acuity in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Changcheng Chen; Mengsi Peng; Yizu Wang; Bao Wu; Yili Zheng; Xueqiang Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Intact tactile anisotropy despite altered hand perception in complex regional pain syndrome: rethinking the role of the primary sensory cortex in tactile and perceptual dysfunction.

Authors:  Annika Reinersmann; Ian W Skinner; Thomas Lücke; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Henrik Rudolf; G Lorimer Moseley; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Upper cervical two-point discrimination thresholds in migraine patients and headache-free controls.

Authors:  Kerstin Luedtke; Waclaw Adamczyk; Katrin Mehrtens; Inken Moeller; Louisa Rosenbaum; Axel Schaefer; Janine Schroeder; Tibor Szikszay; Christian Zimmer; Bettina Wollesen
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 7.277

4.  Modernising tactile acuity assessment; clinimetrics of semi-automated tests and effects of age, sex and anthropometry on performance.

Authors:  Nick A Olthof; Michel W Coppieters; G Lorimer Moseley; Michele Sterling; Dylan J Chippindall; Daniel S Harvie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Correlations between Age, Pain Intensity, Disability, and Tactile Acuity in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Kangyong Zheng; Jinlong Wu; Rui Wang; Xiao Zhuang; Xueqiang Wang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.