| Literature DB >> 26796993 |
Joonwon Lim1, Uday Narayan Maiti1, Na-Young Kim2, Rekha Narayan1, Won Jun Lee1, Dong Sung Choi1, Youngtak Oh1, Ju Min Lee1, Gil Yong Lee1, Seok Hun Kang1, Hyunwoo Kim3, Yong-Hyun Kim2, Sang Ouk Kim1.
Abstract
Atomic level engineering of graphene-based materials is in high demand to enable customize structures and properties for different applications. Unzipping of the graphene plane is a potential means to this end, but uncontrollable damage of the two-dimensional crystalline framework during harsh unzipping reaction has remained a key challenge. Here we present heteroatom dopant-specific unzipping of carbon nanotubes as a reliable and controllable route to customized intact crystalline graphene-based nanostructures. Substitutional pyridinic nitrogen dopant sites at carbon nanotubes can selectively initiate the unzipping of graphene side walls at a relatively low electrochemical potential (0.6 V). The resultant nanostructures consisting of unzipped graphene nanoribbons wrapping around carbon nanotube cores maintain the intact two-dimensional crystallinity with well-defined atomic configuration at the unzipped edges. Large surface area and robust electrical connectivity of the synergistic nanostructure demonstrate ultrahigh-power supercapacitor performance, which can serve for AC filtering with the record high rate capability of -85° of phase angle at 120 Hz.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26796993 PMCID: PMC4735752 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Carbon nanostructure formation by N-dopant-specific unzipping.
(a) Schematic illustration of N-dopant-specific unzipping of NCNTs and scanning electron microscopy images of resulting unzipped nanostructures consisting of graphene nanoribbons wrapping around NCNT cores. (b–d) Aberration-corrected TEM images of unzipped nanostructures. (b) Seamless junction between CNT and unzipped nanoribbons. (c) Intact crystalline unzipped graphene nanoribbons with fast Fourier transformation analysis (top right) and magnified observation showing in-plain hexagonal carbon lattice (bottom right). (d) Unfurled unzipped edge with zigzag-predominant configuration. Green, orange and black colour indicate zigzag edges, armchair edges and chiral-edges, respectively. Inset shows in-plain hexagonal carbon lattice as an angle reference for edge-configuration characterization. (e) AFM image of unzipped nanostructure, where NCNTs and graphene nanoribbons are seamlessly connected. Blue and red arrows indicate NCNT and graphene nanoribbons, respectively. (f,g) C1s XPS and Raman spectra of unzipped nanostructures (top) and NCNTs (bottom). Scale bars are 50 nm in a, 2 nm in b,c, 1 nm in d and 100 nm in e.
Figure 2Reaction mechanism for N-dopant-specific unzipping.
(a,b) N1s and Fe2p XPS spectra before and after unzipping. Np (a) and Fe (b) completely disappear after unzipping. (c,d) Reaction mechanism for initiation and propagation stages. Fe2+ is extracted from FeN4 site in NCNTs under acidic positive-biased condition, and subsequent acid-catalysed imine hydrolysis undergoes (c). Unzipping propagates along the longitudinal direction through continuous C=C bond breaking with high-energy oxygen species, such as singlet O2 or O3 molecules (d).
Figure 3Structure and chemical evolution during N-dopant-specific unzipping of NCNTs.
(a) Aberration-corrected TEM images of 2-, 8- and 16-h-unzipped nanostructures (in 1 M H2SO4 at 0.8 V). (b) Np and O contents versus unzipping time. (c) Capacitive current in cyclic voltammogram versus unzipping time. Scale bar, 2 nm.
Figure 4Ultrahigh-power double layer capacitors with unzipped nanostructure forest electrodes.
(a) Cyclic voltammograms at fast scan rates. (b) AC impedance phase angle versus frequency; vertical dotted line indicates 120 Hz frequency. (c) Complex plane plot of impedance; inset shows an expanded view in high-frequency region. (d) Specific capacitance versus frequency assuming a series RC circuit model. (e) Imaginary part (C”) of specific capacitance versus frequency.
A comparison of electrochemical performance of various carbon-based DLCs.
| Sandwich-type device | This work | 1 | 85 | 0.21 | 1.15 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.95 |
| Miller | VG | 82 | ∼ 0.2 | 1.1 | NA | 0.09 | 0.73 | |
| Sheng | ErGO | 84 | 1.35 | 3.4 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.28 | |
| Du and Pan | CNTs | < 75 | NA | NA | 1.5 | NA | NA | |
| T. Nathan-Walleser | TrGO | 30 | 2.3 | NA | 4.1 | 3.6 | 1.8 | |
| Pech | AC | ∼1 | NA | NA | 700 | NA | NA | |
| El-kady | AEC (63 V/220 μF) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ∼10−4 | |
| Lin | AEC | 83.9 | 0.14 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Micro-device | Lin | G/CNTCs | 81.5 | 0.20 | 21.3 | 0.82 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| El-kady | LSG | < 30 | NA | NA | > 1.6 | NA | NA | |
| Pech | OLC | NA | NA | NA | 26 | NA | NA |
AC, activated carbon; AEC, aluminium electrolytic capacitors; CNT, carbon nanotube; DLC, double-layer capacitor; ErGO, electrochemical reduced graphene oxide; G/CNTC, graphene-CNTs carpet; LSG: laser-scribed graphene; NA, not applicable; OLC, onion-like carbon; TrGO, thermally reduced graphene oxide; VG, vertical graphene.
All of the data are the best result in impedance phase angle in each literature.
*The values are estimated from the value of CA at 120 Hz and the thickness of only active material in each literature (equation (2)).