Literature DB >> 26796947

Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments.

Nancy Santesso1, Alonso Carrasco-Labra2, Miranda Langendam3, Romina Brignardello-Petersen4, Reem A Mustafa5, Pauline Heus6, Toby Lasserson7, Newton Opiyo7, Ilkka Kunnamo8, David Sinclair9, Paul Garner10, Shaun Treweek11, David Tovey7, Elie A Akl12, Peter Tugwell13, Jan L Brozek14, Gordon Guyatt14, Holger J Schünemann15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is widely used and reliable and accurate for assessing the certainty in the body of health evidence. The GRADE working group has provided detailed guidance for assessing the certainty in the body of evidence in systematic reviews and health technology assessments (HTAs) and how to grade the strength of health recommendations. However, there is limited advice regarding how to maximize transparency of these judgments, in particular through explanatory footnotes or explanations in Summary of Findings tables and Evidence Profiles (GRADE evidence tables).
METHODS: We conducted this study to define the essential attributes of useful explanations and to develop specific guidance for explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables. We used a sample of explanations according to their complexity, type of judgment involved, and appropriateness from a database of published GRADE evidence tables in Cochrane reviews and World Health Organization guidelines. We used an iterative process and group consensus to determine the attributes and develop guidance.
RESULTS: Explanations in GRADE evidence tables should be concise, informative, relevant, easy to understand, and accurate. We provide general and domain-specific guidance to assist authors with achieving these desirable attributes in their explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables.
CONCLUSIONS: Adhering to the general and GRADE domain-specific guidance should improve the quality of explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables, assist authors of systematic reviews, HTA reports, or guidelines with information that they can use in other parts of their evidence synthesis. This guidance will also support editorial evaluation of evidence syntheses using GRADE and provide a minimum quality standard of judgments across tables.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Evidence Profile; Explanations; GRADE; GRADEpro; Guidelines; Levels of evidence; Summary of Findings table; Systematic reviews

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26796947     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  12 in total

1.  Nordic dietary patterns and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Paraskevi Massara; Andreea Zurbau; Andrea J Glenn; Laura Chiavaroli; Tauseef A Khan; Effie Viguiliouk; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Elena M Comelli; Victoria Chen; Ursula Schwab; Ulf Risérus; Matti Uusitupa; Anne-Marie Aas; Kjeld Hermansen; Inga Thorsdottir; Dario Rahelić; Hana Kahleová; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Cyril W C Kendall; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 10.460

Review 2.  Surgery for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Gabriel Torbahn; Jana Brauchmann; Emma Axon; Ken Clare; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Susanna Wiegand; Janey Sa Pratt; Louisa J Ells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 3.  Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Schumann; Eva C Henrich; Hellen Strobl; Roland Prondzinsky; Sophie Weiche; Holger Thiele; Karl Werdan; Stefan Frantz; Susanne Unverzagt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-29

4.  Supplemental perioperative intravenous crystalloids for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  James K Jewer; Michael J Wong; Sally J Bird; Ashraf S Habib; Robin Parker; Ronald B George
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 5.  Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies.

Authors:  Carlijn R Hooijmans; Rob B M de Vries; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Maroeska M Rovers; Mariska M Leeflang; Joanna IntHout; Kimberley E Wever; Lotty Hooft; Hans de Beer; Ton Kuijpers; Malcolm R Macleod; Emily S Sena; Gerben Ter Riet; Rebecca L Morgan; Kristina A Thayer; Andrew A Rooney; Gordon H Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann; Miranda W Langendam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Derek K Chu; Elie A Akl; Stephanie Duda; Karla Solo; Sally Yaacoub; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review of Multiple Streams of Evidence.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Joanne Khabsa; Karla Solo; Assem M Khamis; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Amena El-Harakeh; Andrea Darzi; Anisa Hajizadeh; Antonio Bognanni; Anna Bak; Ariel Izcovich; Carlos A Cuello-Garcia; Chen Chen; Ewa Borowiack; Fatimah Chamseddine; Finn Schünemann; Gian Paolo Morgano; Giovanna E U Muti-Schünemann; Guang Chen; Hong Zhao; Ignacio Neumann; Jan Brozek; Joel Schmidt; Layal Hneiny; Leila Harrison; Marge Reinap; Mats Junek; Nancy Santesso; Rayane El-Khoury; Rebecca Thomas; Robby Nieuwlaat; Rosa Stalteri; Sally Yaacoub; Tamara Lotfi; Tejan Baldeh; Thomas Piggott; Yuan Zhang; Zahra Saad; Bram Rochwerg; Dan Perri; Eddy Fan; Florian Stehling; Imad Bou Akl; Mark Loeb; Paul Garner; Stephen Aston; Waleed Alhazzani; Wojciech Szczeklik; Derek K Chu; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Aerosol-generating behaviours in speech pathology clinical practice: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Antonia Margarita Chacon; Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Catherine Madill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.

Authors:  Konstantin Uhlig; Ljupcho Efremov; Jörn Tongers; Stefan Frantz; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Daniel Sedding; Julia Schumann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-05

Review 10.  Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.