Literature DB >> 26796614

Unexpected but Incidental Positive Outcomes Predict Real-World Gambling.

A Ross Otto1, Stephen M Fleming2, Paul W Glimcher3.   

Abstract

Positive mood can affect a person's tendency to gamble, possibly because positive mood fosters unrealistic optimism. At the same time, unexpected positive outcomes, often called prediction errors, influence mood. However, a linkage between positive prediction errors-the difference between expected and obtained outcomes-and consequent risk taking has yet to be demonstrated. Using a large data set of New York City lottery gambling and a model inspired by computational accounts of reward learning, we found that people gamble more when incidental outcomes in the environment (e.g., local sporting events and sunshine) are better than expected. When local sports teams performed better than expected, or a sunny day followed a streak of cloudy days, residents gambled more. The observed relationship between prediction errors and gambling was ubiquitous across the city's socioeconomically diverse neighborhoods and was specific to sports and weather events occurring locally in New York City. Our results suggest that unexpected but incidental positive outcomes influence risk taking.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; emotions; open data; risk taking

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26796614     DOI: 10.1177/0956797615618366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  8 in total

1.  Context-dependent choice and evaluation in real-world consumer behavior.

Authors:  Aaron M Bornstein; Kenway Louie; A Ross Otto; Sean Devine; Eric Schulz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Neuro-computational account of how mood fluctuations arise and affect decision making.

Authors:  Fabien Vinckier; Lionel Rigoux; Delphine Oudiette; Mathias Pessiglione
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Affective responses to uncertain real-world outcomes: Sentiment change on Twitter.

Authors:  Sudeep Bhatia; Barbara Mellers; Lukasz Walasek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dissecting the links between reward and loss, decision-making, and self-reported affect using a computational approach.

Authors:  Vikki Neville; Peter Dayan; Iain D Gilchrist; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael Mendl
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Intracerebral mechanisms explaining the impact of incidental feedback on mood state and risky choice.

Authors:  Romane Cecchi; Fabien Vinckier; Jiri Hammer; Petr Marusic; Anca Nica; Sylvain Rheims; Agnès Trebuchon; Emmanuel J Barbeau; Marie Denuelle; Louis Maillard; Lorella Minotti; Philippe Kahane; Mathias Pessiglione; Julien Bastin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Effects of Age and Initial Risk Perception on Balloon Analog Risk Task: The Mediating Role of Processing Speed and Need for Cognitive Closure.

Authors:  Maciej Koscielniak; Klara Rydzewska; Grzegorz Sedek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-06

7.  Real-world unexpected outcomes predict city-level mood states and risk-taking behavior.

Authors:  A Ross Otto; Johannes C Eichstaedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Momentary subjective well-being depends on learning and not reward.

Authors:  Bastien Blain; Robb B Rutledge
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.