Literature DB >> 26796288

Facilitators and barriers to application of the Canadian C-spine rule by emergency department triage nurses.

Catherine M Clement1, Ian G Stiell2, Maureen A Lowe3, Jamie C Brehaut4, Lisa A Calder2, Christian Vaillancourt2, Jeffrey J Perry2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We recently conducted a multicentre implementation study on the use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) by emergency department (ED) nurses to clear the c-spine in alert and stable trauma patients (n = 4506). The objective of this study was to conduct a survey of nurses, physicians, and administrators to evaluate their views on the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the CCR.
METHODS: We conducted both a paper-based and an electronic survey of the three different ED hospital staff groups of nine large teaching hospitals in Ontario, including six regional trauma centres. The content of this survey was informed by a qualitative evaluation of the opinions of the study nurses who had participated in the validation study.
RESULTS: 57.5% (281/489) ED triage nurses, 50.2% ED physicians, and 82.8% of administrators responded. Nurse responses most often showed support from manager/educators and teamwork between physicians, nurses, and managers as being important facilitators to the use of the CCR. Physician responses most often identified the importance of a nurse leader/champion/educator, and presence of strong physician leaders. Administrator responses indicated the importance of nurse educators/champions, nurse engagement, and educational support. Barriers indicated by all three groups included busy department, lack of physician support, and lack of nursing support.
CONCLUSIONS: Bringing about change in clinical practice is complex. Strong leadership, effective communication, and senior physician buy-in appear to be very important. Identification of system-specific barriers and facilitators are important components of successful knowledge translation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine injury; Clinical decision rule; Emergency department; Implementation; Knowledge translation; Nursing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26796288     DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 1878-013X            Impact factor:   2.142


  4 in total

Review 1.  Factors which affect the application and implementation of a spinal motion restriction protocol by prehospital providers in a low resource setting: A scoping review.

Authors:  Charlene Geduld; Henra Muller; Colleen J Saunders
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 2.  Determinants of clinical practice guidelines' utilization for the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review.

Authors:  Delphine Sorondo; Cyrille Delpierre; Pierre Côté; Louis-Rachid Salmi; Christine Cedraschi; Anne Taylor-Vaisey; Nadège Lemeunier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Barriers and facilitators for guideline adherence in diagnostic imaging: an explorative study of GPs' and radiologists' perspectives.

Authors:  Ann Mari Gransjøen; Siri Wiig; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Health care personnel's perception of guideline implementation for musculoskeletal imaging: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Ann Mari Gransjøen; Siri Wiig; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.