Literature DB >> 26796192

Right Bundle Branch Block-Like Pattern During Uncomplicated Right Ventricular Pacing and the Effect of Pacing Site.

Stylianos Tzeis1, George Andrikopoulos2, Severin Weigand3, Christian Grebmer3, Verena Semmler3, Amir Brkic3, Stefan Asbach4, Axel Kloppe5, Carsten Lennerz3, Felix Bourier3, Sokratis Pastromas2, Christof Kolb3.   

Abstract

Right bundle branch block (RBBB) configuration is an unexpected finding during right ventricular (RV) pacing that raises the suspicion of inadvertent left ventricular lead positioning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of paced RBBB pattern in relation to RV lead location. This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study, which randomized implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients to an apical versus midseptal defibrillator lead positioning. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded during intrinsic rhythm and RV pacing. Paced RBBB-like pattern was defined as positive (>0.05 mV) net amplitude of QRS complex in leads V1 and/or V2. In total, 226 patients (65.6 ± 12.0 years, 20.8% women, 53.1% apical site) were included in the study. The prevalence of paced RBBB pattern in the total population was 15.5%. A significantly lower percentage of patients in the midseptal group demonstrated RBBB-type configuration during RV pacing compared with the apical group (1.9% vs 27.5%, p <0.001). Baseline RBBB, prolonged QRS duration during intrinsic rhythm, and reduced ejection fraction were not associated with increased likelihood of paced RBBB. In the subgroup of patients with RBBB type during pacing, 91.4% of patients had a paced QRS axis from -30° to -90°, whereas 100% of patients displayed a negative QRS vector at lead V3. In conclusion, RBBB configuration is encountered in a considerable percentage of device recipients during uncomplicated RV pacing. Midseptal lead positioning is associated with significantly lower likelihood of paced RBBB pattern compared with apical location.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26796192     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  [Right bundle branch block during right ventricular pacing].

Authors:  Harilaos Bogossian; Fuad Hasan; Gerrit Frommeyer; Bernd Lemke; Markus Zarse
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2017-03

2.  Percutaneous extraction of a malpositioned subclavian arterial pacing lead using the retained wire technique and a vascular closure device: a case report.

Authors:  Primero Ng; Vince Paul; Sharad Shetty; James Lambert
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Right bundle branch block pattern after uncomplicated right ventricular outflow tract pacing in a patient with a left sided superior vena cava and corrected tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Anunay Gupta; Neeraj Parakh; Rajnish Juneja
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-11-26

4.  Prognostic impact of right bundle branch block in hospitalized patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Li Lai; Rong Jiang; Wei Fang; Chao Yan; Yibin Tang; Wei Hua; Michael Fu; Xiaoping Li; Rong Luo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 1.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.