OBJECTIVE: Eating disorders (EDs) are serious problems among college-age women and may be preventable. An indicated online eating disorder (ED) intervention, designed to reduce ED and comorbid pathology, was evaluated. METHOD: 206 women (M age = 20 ± 1.8 years; 51% White/Caucasian, 11% African American, 10% Hispanic, 21% Asian/Asian American, 7% other) at very high risk for ED onset (i.e., with high weight/shape concerns plus a history of being teased, current or lifetime depression, and/or nonclinical levels of compensatory behaviors) were randomized to a 10-week, Internet-based, cognitive-behavioral intervention or waitlist control. Assessments included the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE, to assess ED onset), EDE-Questionnaire, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders, and Beck Depression Inventory-II. RESULTS:ED attitudes and behaviors improved more in the intervention than control group (p = .02, d = 0.31); although ED onset rate was 27% lower, this difference was not significant (p = .28, NNT = 15). In the subgroup with highest shape concerns, ED onset rate was significantly lower in the intervention than control group (20% vs. 42%, p = .025, NNT = 5). For the 27 individuals with depression at baseline, depressive symptomatology improved more in the intervention than control group (p = .016, d = 0.96); although ED onset rate was lower in the intervention than control group, this difference was not significant (25% vs. 57%, NNT = 4). CONCLUSIONS: An inexpensive, easily disseminated intervention might reduce ED onset among those at highest risk. Low adoption rates need to be addressed in future research. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Eating disorders (EDs) are serious problems among college-age women and may be preventable. An indicated online eating disorder (ED) intervention, designed to reduce ED and comorbid pathology, was evaluated. METHOD: 206 women (M age = 20 ± 1.8 years; 51% White/Caucasian, 11% African American, 10% Hispanic, 21% Asian/Asian American, 7% other) at very high risk for ED onset (i.e., with high weight/shape concerns plus a history of being teased, current or lifetime depression, and/or nonclinical levels of compensatory behaviors) were randomized to a 10-week, Internet-based, cognitive-behavioral intervention or waitlist control. Assessments included the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE, to assess ED onset), EDE-Questionnaire, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders, and Beck Depression Inventory-II. RESULTS: ED attitudes and behaviors improved more in the intervention than control group (p = .02, d = 0.31); although ED onset rate was 27% lower, this difference was not significant (p = .28, NNT = 15). In the subgroup with highest shape concerns, ED onset rate was significantly lower in the intervention than control group (20% vs. 42%, p = .025, NNT = 5). For the 27 individuals with depression at baseline, depressive symptomatology improved more in the intervention than control group (p = .016, d = 0.96); although ED onset rate was lower in the intervention than control group, this difference was not significant (25% vs. 57%, NNT = 4). CONCLUSIONS: An inexpensive, easily disseminated intervention might reduce ED onset among those at highest risk. Low adoption rates need to be addressed in future research. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: C Barr Taylor; Susan Bryson; Angela A Celio Doyle; Kristine H Luce; Darby Cunning; Liana B Abascal; Roxanne Rockwell; Alison E Field; Ruth Striegel-Moore; Andrew J Winzelberg; Denise E Wilfley Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ruth H Striegel-Moore; Faith A Dohm; Helena C Kraemer; C Barr Taylor; Stephen Daniels; Patricia B Crawford; George B Schreiber Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Katherine N Balantekin; Dawn M Eichen; Andrea K Graham; Grace E Monterubio; Shiri Sadeh-Sharvit; Neha J Goel; Rachael E Flatt; Kristina Saffran; Anna M Karam; Marie-Laure Firebaugh; Mickey Trockel; C Barr Taylor; Denise E Wilfley Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Marie-Laure Firebaugh; Andrea K Graham; Dawn M Eichen; Grace E Monterubio; Katherine N Balantekin; Anna M Karam; Annie Seal; Burkhardt Funk; C Barr Taylor; Denise E Wilfley Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2018-11-08
Authors: Andrea E Kass; Katherine N Balantekin; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Corinna Jacobi; Denise E Wilfley; C Barr Taylor Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Simon M Wilksch; Anne O'Shea; C Barr Taylor; Denise Wilfley; Corinna Jacobi; Tracey D Wade Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Dawn M Eichen; Andrea E Kass; Mickey Trockel; Ross D Crosby; C Barr Taylor; Denise E Wilfley Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Andrea K Graham; Mickey Trockel; Hannah Weisman; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Katherine N Balantekin; Denise E Wilfley; C Barr Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Health Date: 2018-10-09