Literature DB >> 26795572

Two-week rule in head and neck cancer 2000-14: a systematic review.

Steve Langton1, Derrick Siau2, Clare Bankhead3.   

Abstract

The fast-track system in the UK for patients with suspected cancer--the two-week rule--states that if cancer is suspected there should be a maximum of 14 days between referral from primary care and consultation with a specialist. This approach is valued by patients, ensures a universal standard of diagnosis, and speeds up the overall management of cancer. However, some say that the rule has had little or no effect on survival, results in a diagnosis of cancer in only a small proportion of patients referred, and is expensive. We have made a systematic review of the effectiveness of the two-week rule in patients with head and neck cancer with the aid of electronic searches of databases. including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CINAHL, and CANCERLIT up to the end of 2014. This was supplemented by searching conference proceedings and contacting experts. Retrospective and prospective studies that included either conversion rate (proportion of two-week referrals who were diagnosed with cancer--positive predictive value), or detection rate (proportion of diagnosed cancers referred under the two-week rule - sensitivity), or both, were included. Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion, and extracted data independently. Heterogeneity was assessed by inspection of the overlap of 95% CI in the forest plot and calculation of I(2). We made a random-effects meta-analysis of 17 studies. All reported the conversion rate, and 10 also reported the detection rate. Meta-analysis indicated an overall pooled conversion rate of 8.8% (95% CI 7.0% to 10.7%) and a pooled detection rate of 40.8% (95% CI 25.7% to 55.8%) Subgroups in which maxillofacial (OFMS) and otolaryngology (ENT) were assessed showed no significant difference in conversion rate (8.3% and 8.8%; p=0.73). Subgroup analyses of early studies (before the end of 2008) and later studies (2009-14), showed a significant reduction in conversion rates from 10.6% to 6.6%, p=<0.0001. These early and late subgroups showed a significant increase in detection rate (35.0% to 49.7%, p=0.0008). The conversion and detection rates were similar to those for a number of other cancer sites that relied on a list of signs and symptoms for referral and were similar in both ENT and OMFS units. There is evidence that two-week referral conversion rates are falling, while detection rates are rising because of an increased number of referrals. The influence of the two-week referrral on outcomes, particularly survival, is not well known.
Copyright © 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fast-track cancer referral; Head and neck cancer; Two-week rule

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26795572     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  9 in total

1.  The two-week wait - a qualitative analysis of suspected head and neck cancer referrals.

Authors:  S Roy; K Anjum
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Is detecting oral cancer in general dental practices a realistic expectation? A population-based study using population linked data in Scotland.

Authors:  M Purkayastha; A D McMahon; J Gibson; D I Conway
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Mouth cancer: presentation, detection and referral in primary dental care.

Authors:  M A O Lewis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  An audit to analyse the two-week wait pathway at an oral cancer specialist district general hospital.

Authors:  Ariyan S Araghi; Yasmin Harris; Panayiotis Kyzas
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Head and neck cancer risk calculator (HaNC-RC)-V.2. Adjustments and addition of symptoms and social history factors.

Authors:  Theofano Tikka; Kimberley Kavanagh; Anja Lowit; Pan Jiafeng; Harry Burns; Iain J Nixon; Vinidh Paleri; Kenneth MacKenzie
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Remote triage incorporating symptom-based risk stratification for suspected head and neck cancer referrals: A prospective population-based study.

Authors:  John C Hardman; Theofano Tikka; Vinidh Paleri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 8.  Value and Quality of Care in Head and Neck Oncology.

Authors:  Robert P Takes; Gyorgy B Halmos; John A Ridge; Paolo Bossi; Matthias A W Merkx; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alvaro Sanabria; Ludi E Smeele; Antti A Mäkitie; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Rapid implementation of an evidence-based remote triaging system for assessment of suspected referrals and patients with head and neck cancer on follow-up after treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Model for international collaboration.

Authors:  Vinidh Paleri; John Hardman; Theofano Tikka; Paula Bradley; Paul Pracy; Cyrus Kerawala
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.