Caitlin P Pearcy1, Rebecca A Anderson2, Sarah J Egan3, Clare S Rees4. 1. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: caitlin.pearcy@curtin.edu.au. 2. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: rebecca.anderson@curtin.edu.au. 3. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: S.Egan@exchange.curtin.edu.au. 4. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: C.Rees@curtin.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The presence of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can result in low quality of life, with significant impairments in social and occupational functioning. An increase in the dissemination of self-help programs has been observed in the treatment of OCD, and has provided improved accessibility to treatment. The present study examined the efficacy of self-help interventions for OCD in the context of therapeutic contact. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were identified through computerised database searches. Self-help format (bibliotherapy, internet-based, computerised), and therapeutic contact were examined for their effect on treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen studies targeting self-help for OCD met inclusion criteria with 1570 participants. The average post-treatment effect size (Hedges' g) of self-help interventions on primary outcomes was .51 (95% CI: .41 to 0.61). Subgroup analysis revealed large effect sizes for minimal-contact self-help (g = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.17), moderate effect sizes for predominantly self-help (g = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.96), and small effect sizes for self-administered self-help (g = 0.33, 95% CI: .18 to 0.47). LIMITATIONS: A large variation of treatment approaches, amount of therapeutic contact, and risk of bias within each study may account for the large magnitude in effect sizes across studies. Additionally, the long-term follow-up effects of treatment approaches were not examined. CONCLUSIONS: A growing body of literature supporting to the use of self-help treatments for OCD is evident, however, further investigation through use of randomised controlled trials is required, particularly the use of stepped care and long-term effectiveness.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The presence of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can result in low quality of life, with significant impairments in social and occupational functioning. An increase in the dissemination of self-help programs has been observed in the treatment of OCD, and has provided improved accessibility to treatment. The present study examined the efficacy of self-help interventions for OCD in the context of therapeutic contact. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were identified through computerised database searches. Self-help format (bibliotherapy, internet-based, computerised), and therapeutic contact were examined for their effect on treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen studies targeting self-help for OCD met inclusion criteria with 1570 participants. The average post-treatment effect size (Hedges' g) of self-help interventions on primary outcomes was .51 (95% CI: .41 to 0.61). Subgroup analysis revealed large effect sizes for minimal-contact self-help (g = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.17), moderate effect sizes for predominantly self-help (g = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.96), and small effect sizes for self-administered self-help (g = 0.33, 95% CI: .18 to 0.47). LIMITATIONS: A large variation of treatment approaches, amount of therapeutic contact, and risk of bias within each study may account for the large magnitude in effect sizes across studies. Additionally, the long-term follow-up effects of treatment approaches were not examined. CONCLUSIONS: A growing body of literature supporting to the use of self-help treatments for OCD is evident, however, further investigation through use of randomised controlled trials is required, particularly the use of stepped care and long-term effectiveness.
Authors: Sapana R Patel; Michael G Wheaton; Erik Andersson; Christian Rück; Andrew B Schmidt; Christopher N La Lima; Hanga Galfavy; Olivia Pascucci; Robert W Myers; Lisa B Dixon; Helen Blair Simpson Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2017-09-15
Authors: Gunvor Launes; Kristen Hagen; Tor Sunde; Lars-Göran Öst; Ingrid Klovning; Inger-Lill Laukvik; Joseph A Himle; Stian Solem; Sigurd W Hystad; Bjarne Hansen; Gerd Kvale Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-11-15
Authors: Karsten Hollmann; Katharina Allgaier; Carolin S Hohnecker; Heinrich Lautenbacher; Verena Bizu; Matthias Nickola; Gunilla Wewetzer; Christoph Wewetzer; Tord Ivarsson; Norbert Skokauskas; Lidewij H Wolters; Gudmundur Skarphedinsson; Bernhard Weidle; Else de Haan; Nor Christan Torp; Scott N Compton; Rosa Calvo; Sara Lera-Miguel; Anna Haigis; Tobias J Renner; Annette Conzelmann Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Alexander Rozental; Roz Shafran; Tracey D Wade; Radha Kothari; Sarah J Egan; Linda Ekberg; Maria Wiss; Per Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 5.428