Ji-Man Park1, Yong-Shin Hong2, Eun-Jin Park3, Seong-Joo Heo4, Namsik Oh5. 1. Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 2. Former resident, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. 3. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. 4. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 5. Professor, Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea. Electronic address: onsdo@inha.ac.kr.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Few studies have compared the marginal and internal fits of crowns fabricated from machinable palladium-silver-indium (Pd-Ag-In) semiprecious metal alloy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the marginal and internal fits of machined Pd-Ag-In alloy, zirconia, and cast gold crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was performed on 35 participants and 52 abutment teeth at 2 centers. Individuals requiring prosthetic restorations were treated with gold alloy or zirconia crowns (2 control groups) or Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns (experimental group). A replica technique was used to evaluate the marginal and internal fits. The buccolingual and mesiodistal cross-sections were measured, and a noninferiority comparison was conducted. RESULTS: The mean marginal gaps were 68.2 μm for the gold crowns, 75.4 μm for the zirconia crowns, and 76.9 μm for the Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns. In the 5 cross-sections other than the distal cross-section, the 2-sided 95% confidence limits for the differences between the Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns and the 2 control groups were not larger than the 25-μm noninferiority margin. The control groups displayed smaller internal gaps in the line angle and occlusal spaces compared with the Pd-Ag-In crown group. CONCLUSION: The marginal gaps of machinable Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns did not meet the noninferiority criterion in the distal margin compared with zirconia and gold alloy crowns. Nonetheless, all 3 crowns had clinically applicable precision.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Few studies have compared the marginal and internal fits of crowns fabricated from machinable palladium-silver-indium (Pd-Ag-In) semiprecious metal alloy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the marginal and internal fits of machined Pd-Ag-In alloy, zirconia, and cast gold crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was performed on 35 participants and 52 abutment teeth at 2 centers. Individuals requiring prosthetic restorations were treated with gold alloy or zirconia crowns (2 control groups) or Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns (experimental group). A replica technique was used to evaluate the marginal and internal fits. The buccolingual and mesiodistal cross-sections were measured, and a noninferiority comparison was conducted. RESULTS: The mean marginal gaps were 68.2 μm for the gold crowns, 75.4 μm for the zirconia crowns, and 76.9 μm for the Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns. In the 5 cross-sections other than the distal cross-section, the 2-sided 95% confidence limits for the differences between the Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns and the 2 control groups were not larger than the 25-μm noninferiority margin. The control groups displayed smaller internal gaps in the line angle and occlusal spaces compared with the Pd-Ag-In crown group. CONCLUSION: The marginal gaps of machinable Pd-Ag-In alloy crowns did not meet the noninferiority criterion in the distal margin compared with zirconia and gold alloy crowns. Nonetheless, all 3 crowns had clinically applicable precision.