Literature DB >> 26794624

Quality-of-life survey for patients diagnosed with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

I Abáigar-Pedraza1, J Megías-Garrigós2, J Sánchez-Payá3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability and validity of a quality-of-life survey for patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 180 patients were included in the study. We developed a survey with 21 questions grouped into 5 areas. The patients filled in this survey and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-BL) survey. To assess reliability, we calculated Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the kappa index. To determine criterion validity, we studied the association between the scores obtained from our survey and those from the FACT-BL survey using the Pearson correlation coefficient. To determine the construct validity (factorial and discriminatory), we performed a factor analysis, comparing it with Student's t-test for the scores obtained according to the tumour characteristics of reduced quality of life (e.g., malignancies located at the trigone of the bladder).
RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .83, and the kappa index varied between .7 and 1. For the association study between the new survey and the FACT-BL survey, we measured an r=.82 for the overall score and between r=.68 (disease) and r=.97 (sex life) in the various measures. In the factor analysis, we measured a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of .77 and performed the Barlett test (P<.001). The comparison between the scores, in the presence or absence of certain tumour characteristics, has shown a reduced quality of life when those characteristics are present, which was statistically significant (P<.05) in the majority of cases.
CONCLUSION: Our survey to measure the quality of life of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer is reliable and valid.
Copyright © 2015 AEU. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calidad de vida; Cáncer de vejiga superficial; Fiabilidad; Quality of life; Reliability; Superficial bladder cancer; Validez; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26794624     DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Actas Urol Esp        ISSN: 0210-4806            Impact factor:   0.994


  3 in total

Review 1.  Health Related Quality of life in bladder cancer. Current approach and future perspectives.

Authors:  Anamaria Truta; Tudor Adrian Hodor Popon; George Saraci; Liviu Ghervan; Ioan Victor Pop
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2017-07-15

2.  Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

Authors:  Samantha J Mason; James W F Catto; Amy Downing; Sarah E Bottomley; Adam W Glaser; Penny Wright
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Quality of life in patients undergoing surveillance for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer-a systematic review.

Authors:  Arvind Nayak; Joanne Cresswell; Paramananthan Mariappan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.