| Literature DB >> 26793231 |
Xabier Santiso1, Lua Lopez2, Rubén Retuerto1, Rodolfo Barreiro3.
Abstract
Arbutus unedo L. is an evergreen shrub with a circum-Mediterranean distribution that also reaches the Eurosiberian region in northern Iberia, Atlantic France, and a disjunct population in southern Ireland. Due to the variety of climatic conditions across its distribution range, the populations of A. unedo were expected to display local adaptation. Conversely, common garden experiments revealed that diverse genotypes from a range of provenances produce similar phenotypes through adaptive plasticity, suggesting the action of stabilizing selection across its climatically heterogeneous range. Nonetheless, since a uniform response might also result from extensive gene flow, we have inferred the population structure of A. unedo and assessed whether its extended and largely one-dimensional range influences gene flow with the help of AFLP genotypes for 491 individuals from 19 populations covering the whole range of the species. As we had anticipated, gene flow is restricted in A. unedo, providing further support to the hypothesis that stabilizing selection is the most likely explanation for the homogeneous phenotypes along the range. The Euro-Siberian populations were not particularly isolated from the Mediterranean. Instead, there was a distinct genetic divide between the populations around the Mediterranean Sea and those sampled along Atlantic coasts from northern Africa up to Ireland. This genetic structure suggests the action of historic rather than biogeographic factors as it seems consistent with a scenario of independent glacial refugia in the Atlantic and Mediterranean portions of the range of A. unedo. Genetic exchange was likewise restricted within each set of populations. Nevertheless, isolation-by-distance (IBD) was stronger, and F ST increased faster with distance, along the Atlantic, suggesting that gene flow might be larger among Mediterranean populations. Genetic diversity was significantly lower in NW Iberia and Ireland than in other populations whereas Ireland was more closely related to populations in NW Iberia than to a population in Atlantic France, suggesting a postglacial stepping-stone colonization of the Atlantic coast. Altogether, our results show that stabilizing selection is able to homogenize the phenotypic response even when population structure is strong, gene flow is constrained, and the phylogeographic past is complex.Entities:
Keywords: AFLP; Arbutus unedo; Atlantic-Mediterranean split; disjunct distribution; genetic diversity; genetic structure; stabilizing selection
Year: 2016 PMID: 26793231 PMCID: PMC4710743 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Distribution range with the location of the 19 . Population histograms show the genetic cluster of each individual (vertical bars) for the optimal number of seven genetic clusters (P = 0.9793) obtained after admixture with the spatial analysis option. Open triangles and circles are populations assigned to Mediterranean and Atlantic genetic clades, respectively. Double-dashed line indicates the limits between the Euro-Siberian and Mediterranean biogeographical regions. See Materials and Methods for population names.
Sampling sites and genetic diversity estimates based on 125 segregating loci (5% criterion) obtained with AFLPs for .
| IK | 29U 465211 5763297 | 27 (29) | 94 (75.2%) | 0 | 0.26 (±0.016) |
| FB | 30T 643276 4939413 | 24 (26) | 103 (82.4%) | 0 | 0.31 (±0.015) |
| EP | 29T 705440 4722721 | 27 (29) | 99 (79.2%) | 0 | 0.28 (±0.016) |
| PA | 29S 497741 4257559 | 24 (27) | 108 (86.4%) | 0 | 0.32 (±0.015) |
| PM | 29S 538873 4126983 | 24 (27) | 109 (87.2%) | 0 | 0.30 (±0.015) |
| EM | 30S 376766 4076446 | 26 (29) | 103 (82.4%) | 0 | 0.30 (±0.015) |
| MT | 30S 267001 3940810 | 21 (23) | 112 (89.6%) | 0 | 0.32 (±0.014) |
| MD | 30S 492658 3759875 | 23 (25) | 108 (86.4%) | 0 | 0.31 (±0.014) |
| EC | 31T 454080 4620578 | 24 (25) | 108 (86.4%) | 0 | 0.31 (±0.015) |
| FM | 31T 531757 4829416 | 26 (28) | 102 (81.6%) | 0 | 0.30 (±0.015) |
| EI | 31S 461243 4392754 | 25 (27) | 104 (83.2%) | 0 | 0.31 (±0.015) |
| IC | 32S 491121 4333556 | 24 (26) | 114 (91.2%) | 0 | 0.34 (±0.014) |
| TK | 32S 470929 4061547 | 21 (23) | 110 (88.0%) | 0 | 0.32 (±0.015) |
| IR | 33T 279753 4619932 | 26 (27) | 104 (83.2%) | 0 | 0.32 (±0.015) |
| IT | 32T 637192 4811775 | 21 (23) | 109 (87.2%) | 0 | 0.33 (±0.015) |
| GA | 34S 746586 4206313 | 24 (26) | 113 (90.4%) | 0 | 0.34 (±0.014) |
| GS | 34T 739962 4452294 | 20 (22) | 108 (86.4%) | 0 | 0.33 (±0.015) |
| TC | 35T 459279 4441142 | 23 (24) | 107 (85.6%) | 0 | 0.31 (±0.016) |
| TI | 35S 458841 4254352 | 24 (25) | 109 (87.2%) | 0 | 0.32 (±0.015) |
ATL and MED are total values for populations assigned to Atlantic (8) and Mediterranean (11) genetic lineages by other analyses. See Materials and Methods for population names. Pop, population; N, sample size (effective sample size after accounting for loci with missing values in some individuals); PL, number (and percentage) of polymorphic loci (5% criterion); PB, no. of private bands; Hj, Nei's gene diversity (± standard error).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on 125 segregating AFLPs loci obtained for 491 individuals from 19 populations of .
| Among Populations | 18 | 82.882 | 2.412 (10%) | <0.0001 | ΦPT = 0.105 |
| Within Populations | 472 | 20.583 | 20.583 (90%) | ||
| Among regions | 1 | 555.995 | 2.060 (10%) | <0.001 | ΦRT = 0.103 |
| Among populations | 17 | 57.409 | 1.594 (8%) | <0.001 | ΦPR = 0.089 |
| Within populations | 472 | 16.262 | 16.262 (82%) | <0.001 | ΦPT = 0.183 |
ΦPT, differentiation among populations; ΦRT, differentiation among regions; ΦPR, differentiation among populations inside the regions.
Figure 2Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) showing genetic distances between 19 populations of . Genetic distances were estimated as pairwise FST values obtained after inferring allele frequencies with the Bayesian method of Zhivotovsky (1999) implemented in AFLP-SURV. Open symbols are populations assigned to the Mediterranean genetic group, closed symbols are populations assigned to the Atlantic group. See Materials and Methods for population names.
Fixation indices corresponding to the groups of populations (19 in total) of Arbutus unedo inferred by spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) algorithms (.
| Two groups | 1. EM, EP, FB, IK, MD, MT, PA, PM (Atlantic group) | 0.091*** | 0.191*** | 0.111*** |
| 2. EC, FM, EI, IC, IR, IT, TK, GS, GA, TC, TI (Mediterranean group) | ||||
| Three groups | 1. IK | 0.081*** | 0.189*** | 0.118*** |
| 2. EM, EP, FB, MD, MT, PA, PM (Atlantic group) | ||||
| 3. EC, FM, EI, IC, IR, IT, TK, GS, GA, TC, TI (Mediterranean group) | ||||
| Four groups | 1. IK | 0.0725*** | 0.188*** | 0.125*** |
| 2. MD | ||||
| 3. EM, EP, FB, MT, PA, PM (Atlantic group) | ||||
| 4. EC, FM, EI, IC, IR, IT, TK, GS, GA, TC, TI (Mediterranean group) | ||||
| Five groups | 1. IK | 0.069*** | 0.184*** | 0.124*** |
| 2. MD | ||||
| 3. EP | ||||
| 4. EM, FB, MT, PA, PM (Atlantic group) | ||||
| 5. EC, FM, EI, IC, IR, IT, TK, GS, GA, TC, TI (Mediterranean group) |
FSC, genetic differentiation between populations within groups; FST, genetic differentiation between samples; FCT, genetic variance due to differences among groups of populations.
Figure 3Relationship between geographic and genetic (. Separated analyses were conducted for Atlantic (solid circles) and Mediterranean (asterisks and open circles) populations; asterisks denote pairwise comparisons with population FM. Lines are reduced major axis regressions for the Atlantic group (solid line, r = 0.64, P = 0.990), the Mediterranean group (dashed line, r = 0.36, P = 0.991), and the Mediterranean group with FM excluded (dotted line, r = 0.43, P = 1.000).
Figure 4Area of Western Mediterranean and Atlantic facade with minimum monthly temperatures >4°C (limit for .