Literature DB >> 26793183

Genomic Resource of Rice Seed Associated Bacteria.

Samriti Midha1, Kanika Bansal1, Shikha Sharma1, Narinder Kumar1, Prashant P Patil1, Vasvi Chaudhry1, Prabhu B Patil1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  NGS; diversity; genomics; plant-microbe interactions; rice seeds

Year:  2016        PMID: 26793183      PMCID: PMC4707233          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


× No keyword cloud information.
Plants are host to diverse microbiome that might have co-evolved since millions of years. This resident microbiota can act as extended genome by contributing in plant growth, development and protection from biotic and abiotic stresses. Rice (Oryza Sativa) is a staple food consumed by more than 50% of the world's population. Herein we targeted the bacterial community associated with the healthy rice seeds. In this direction, we isolated and carried out whole genome sequencing of 100 bacterial isolates. These isolates belong to three major bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria that spread over 15 distinct genus and 29 species. A phylogenetic tree based on a broad set of phylogenomic marker genes confirmed the evolutionary relationship amongst the strains and their phylogenetic grouping. Average Nucleotide Identity was also used to establish species identity of isolates that form a particular phylogenetic and taxonomic grouping. The data generated from the present study is one of the first major genomic resources in the field of phytobiome research. Whole genome sequence of the members will be invaluable in this era of big data driven research. Moreover, the majority of genus and species identified in this study are already known for plant probiotic properties. This genomic data with annotation will aid in comparative, evolutionary and ecological studies of bacteria associated with plants or multi-kingdom bacteria associated with nosocomial infections.

Methods

Isolation of bacteria from seed

Rice seeds were collected from farmer's field in Fazilka, Punjab, India practicing conventional farming and growing basmati variety. Bacterial isolations were done from a pool of seeds isolated from the same field grown and harvested in three successive years. First isolation was from the seeds harvested in the year 2011, next three isolations were from the crop harvested in 2012 and last from the year 2013. For bacterial extractions, 5 g of seeds were partially crushed (~80%) in normal saline (0.85% NaCl) using sterile pestle and mortar and suspended in 50 ml of the solution (10%; Cottyn et al., 2001). These solutions were incubated for 2 h at 4°C/28°C and then dilution plating was done up to 10−6. Samples from each dilution were plated in triplicates on six different media, Peptone Sucrose Agar (PSA), Glucose Yeast extract Calcium carbonate Agar (GYCA), Luria broth (LB) agar, King's B (KB) agar, Nutrient broth (NB) agar, and Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). Plates were incubated at 28°C and growth was checked up to 6 days. Control plates with/without saline solution were also incubated to check for contamination up to 1 month. Bacterial colonies based on diverse morphology were selected and further processed, as the aim was to capture maximum diversity associated with rice seeds. Bacterial cultures were frozen in 15% glycerol at −80°C.

Identification by 16S rDNA sequencing

Bacterial isolates were streaked on nutrient broth (NB) agar to get single colonies and 3–4 colonies of each bacterium were suspended into 50 μl of water. Freeze-thaw shock was given to bacteria by freezing the vial at −80°C for 10 min and then incubation at 95°C for 5 min. After that samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 1 min to collect the supernatant and this step was repeated once again before proceeding further. Samples were quantified for DNA using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific) and PCR was performed using universal 16S rRNA amplification primers 27F (AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT). After checking for amplification on 1% agarose gel, samples were treated with Exo-Sap (USB, Affymetrix Inc. Cleveland, Ohio, USA) to remove single stranded DNA primers and unused dNTPs and samples were subjected to sanger sequencing using in-house facility ABI DNA sequencer. Data generated in ABI files were visualized in Finch TV v1.4.0 to select the sequences of high quality that were analyzed using Ez-BioCloud (Kim et al., 2012) to identify the closest bacterial species. From five different isolations, 469 colonies were obtained as a pure culture. Further based on morphological characteristics on the agar plates, the sample size was reduced to 147 for identification of species by 16S rRNA sequencing. Out of these 147 cultures, further shortlisting was done to 100 isolates for genome sequencing, which consisted of minimum one representative of each species from each lot to represent the seed associated bacterial diversity.

Genome sequencing, assembly, and analysis

Bacterial cultures were revived from −80°C stocks and ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA isolation kit (Zymo Research) was used to isolate DNA from these. DNA quality check was done using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific) and agarose gel electrophoresis and quantitation of DNA was performed using Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies). Sequencing library preparation was performed using Nextera XT sample preparation kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and loaded on to in-house Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using company supplied paired-end sequencing kits. Adapter trimming was done automatically by MiSeq Control Software (MCS) and additional adapter contamination identified by NCBI server was removed by manual trimming. De novo assembly of the sequences were done using CLC genomic workbench v7.5 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) with default settings. Sequences were annotated using NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/). RNAmmer 1.2 server was used to annotate the RNA sequences and Ez-BioCloud to identify the closest bacterial species. Protein sequences of 10 known phylogenomic marker genes (infC, rplB, rplC, rplD, rplE, rplF, rplM, rplN, and rplP) were extracted from the genomic sequences, aligned, and concatenated to obtain multi locus strain phylogeny. These are single copy and universally distributed genes with core housekeeping functions (Wu and Eisen, 2008) and importantly found to be relatively immune to horizontal gene transfer (Jain et al., 1999). Sequences were aligned using Mega v6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with 500 bootstrap replicates. JSpecies 1.2.1 software was used to calculate Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) amongst different strains (Richter and Rosselló-Móra, 2009).

Nucleotide sequences accession numbers

The data has been submitted to NCBI GenBank under accession no. LDPZ00000000-LDTU00000000 and assembly statistics for the 100 bacterial genomes sequenced is provided in Table 1.
Table 1

Assembly statistics and annotation features of bacterial isolates from rice and their accession numbers.

S.NoStrainGenome size (bp)Coverage(x)ContigsN50(bp)Coding Density (%)GenestRNAAccession No.
1Aureimonas ureilytica NS226511994310528710107180.2484658LDPZ00000000
2Aureimonas ureilytica NS36550133189318310397381.0469056LDQA00000000
3Curtobacterium citreum NS3303454135732412946881.4335047LDQB00000000
4Curtobacterium luteum NS18435861931002094495180.2346045LDQC00000000
5Curtobacterium oceanosedimentum NS2633370512971644433479.7320646LDRB00000000
6Curtobacterium oceanosedimentum NS3593421352941883949479.4325845LDRC00000000
7Enterobacter asburiae NS2347161607110215472489.0447271LDQD00000000
8Enterobacter asburiae NS344722850647216569488.9446270LDQE00000000
9Enterobacter asburiae NS747283171667023592789.0446470LDQF00000000
10Enterobacter cancerogenus NS10448841261175226155287.7463076LDQG00000000
11Enterobacter cancerogenus NS1114874699994926876287.7462279LDQH00000000
12Enterobacter cancerogenus NS18848897531176225414387.8464475LDQI00000000
13Enterobacter cancerogenus NS314869574964526154787.8462076LDQJ00000000
14Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS194731803917534737288.9443669LDQK00000000
15Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS2447055729818710964388.7444467LDQL00000000
16Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS2847368071463843138588.9441873LDQM00000000
17Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS2947121678212916047688.8444973LDQN00000000
18Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS37147253001253734535788.8440271LDQO00000000
19Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS4947198511283337139188.9440170LDQP00000000
20Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS5747302291294426538288.9441774LDQQ00000000
21Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS6447239701027627709188.8443471LDQR00000000
22Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS754120285926013149288.9440872LDQS00000000
23Enterobacter xiangfangensis NS804722881853228247788.9440573LDQT00000000
24Enterobacter xiangfangensis RSA847071367217213484588.7446771LDQU00000000
25Exiguobacterium indicum RSA113083121895310956788.0321357LDQV00000000
26Exiguobacterium indicum RSA423095093791266929187.6323365LDQW00000000
27Kocuria kristinae RSA2823024992051592529276.4207247LDRD00000000
28Kocuria kristinae RSA522824972362042128275.9207447LDRE00000000
29Kocuria kristinae SA1122435661942021960176.3204344LDRF00000000
30Kocuria kristinae SA1222176681292491742776.0204946LDRG00000000
31Kocuria kristinae SA1322520401582331588976.0207744LDRH00000000
32Kocuria kristinae SA1422458052701752307276.0199643LDRI00000000
33Kocuria kristinae SA1522659632102111913076.1206147LDRJ00000000
34Leucobacter chromiiresistens NS35428410401011943744684.6261844LDRK00000000
35Methylobacterium aquaticum NS22863233491104872904580.0586167LDRL00000000
36Methylobacterium aquaticum NS22963772941104433001880.1590769LDRM00000000
37Methylobacterium aquaticum NS23063538031273843270879.9583565LDRN00000000
38Methylobacterium radiotolerans SB266475701163345543681.8625447LDRO00000000
39Methylobacterium radiotolerans SB366938411103515539381.8636153LDRP00000000
40Microbacterium oxydans NS23440133261141368921887.8397641LDRQ00000000
41Microbacterium testaceum NS1833942620943053717484.7376045LDRR00000000
42Microbacterium testaceum NS20638819141133004467084.7368744LDRS00000000
43Microbacterium testaceum NS22040239111182913219882.9382943LDRT00000000
44Microbacterium testaceum NS28339034571401775041986.3365545LDRU00000000
45Microbacterium testaceum RSA339141641022224295984.9371245LDRV00000000
46Paenibacillus jamilae NS1155586901493115841284.5499758LDRX00000000
47Novosphingobium barchaimii NS27735534421357519313284.3333245LDRW00000000
48Pantoea ananatis NS2964734861695419358285.2443965LDQX00000000
49Pantoea ananatis NS3034733153806918239885.3442159LDQY00000000
50Pantoea ananatis NS31147216387317411859885.1444964LDQZ00000000
51Pantoea ananatis RSA474738039914622987785.2443965LDRA00000000
52Pantoea dispersa NS2154843865843527135486.9442567LDRY00000000
53Pantoea dispersa NS3754887220814231851686.5451073LDRZ00000000
54Pantoea dispersa NS38048010647412319571086.3445470LDSA00000000
55Pantoea dispersa NS3894819785735422872886.5442061LDSB00000000
56Pantoea dispersa RSA3149495259019426615886.7460764LDSC00000000
57Pantoea dispersa SA24906145525225527185.8448866LDSD00000000
58Pantoea dispersa SA34905368728318530385.9449465LDSE00000000
59Pantoea dispersa SA44911078555815653385.8450368LDSF00000000
60Pantoea dispersa SA54897186779819071485.9450064LDSG00000000
61Pantoea stewartii NS3814693026825126828084.7433868LDSH00000000
62Pantoea stewartii RSA134766695964816759484.4442367LDSI00000000
63Pantoea stewartii RSA304760407658421195284.3442065LDSJ00000000
64Pantoea stewartii RSA3647912951397628576584.2445164LDSK00000000
65Pseudacidovorax intermedius NS3315547045972953436284.5507649LDSL00000000
66Pseudomonas parafulva NS212482385814714710769386.7435965LDSM00000000
67Pseudomonas parafulva NS96467226517716210845187.2428364LDSN00000000
68Pseudomonas psychrotolerans NS2527141014613014353786.4468759LDSO00000000
69Pseudomonas psychrotolerans NS201526284713917211960586.7478355LDSP00000000
70Pseudomonas psychrotolerans NS27454180491351039523986.2484860LDSQ00000000
71Pseudomonas psychrotolerans NS33748374976219211895688.0455959LDSR00000000
72Pseudomonas psychrotolerans NS3765326810951369984386.0479060LDSS00000000
73Pseudomonas psychrotolerans NS38354131731131749474286.0487755LDST00000000
74Pseudomonas psychrotolerans RSA4654558361201979762486.0493459LDSU00000000
75Pseudomonas psychrotolerans SB11520247911323213448586.7481759LDSV00000000
76Pseudomonas psychrotolerans SB14534544012416912902186.0482361LDSW00000000
77Pseudomonas psychrotolerans SB18533976214717310414886.4488959LDSX00000000
78Pseudomonas psychrotolerans SB554352841131719252186.1488460LDSY00000000
79Pseudomonas psychrotolerans SB8513043613811613711186.5459860LDSZ00000000
80Pseudomonas psychrotolerans SB952839031041219180186.7480357LDTA00000000
81Sphingomonas endophytica NS33436429581643305869685.2350647LDTB00000000
82Sphingomonas sanguinis NS25838688191293463644285.0370845LDTC00000000
83Sphingomonas sanguinis NS31941695941102803318484.9391248LDTD00000000
84Sphingomonas sanguinis SB44019921972264030584.5377249LDTE00000000
85Sphingomonas yabuuchiae NS35539106791331904557885.0361249LDTF00000000
86Staphylococcus epidermidis SA625401471116622767982.1244362LDTG00000000
87Staphylococcus epidermidis SA82505031841813097282.4241949LDTH00000000
88Staphylococcus epidermidis SB7b2506997861484474582.5242355LDTI00000000
89Staphylococcus epidermidis SB7c25594091189610944182.3248558LDTJ00000000
90Staphylococcus sciuri NS12918429801277074685.4297254LDTK00000000
91Staphylococcus sciuri NS1122878717731364983385.3292652LDTL00000000
92Staphylococcus sciuri NS202274369784569356286.8275756LDTM00000000
93Staphylococcus sciuri NS362881364901175233585.3290754LDTN00000000
94Staphylococcus sciuri NS44297982416016414294684.5303855LDTO00000000
95Staphylococcus sciuri NS532897114851555333485.3295151LDTP00000000
96Staphylococcus sciuri RSA372890453130728174285.5291154LDTQ00000000
97Staphylococcus warneri NS346256386996878472883.6248550LDTR00000000
98Staphylococcus warneri SA102549551841453672282.4249753LDTS00000000
99Staphylococcus warneri SA92541660967711437182.0248256LDTT00000000
100Staphylococcus xylosus NS3412842280891115987682.2270254LDTU00000000
Assembly statistics and annotation features of bacterial isolates from rice and their accession numbers.

Interpretation of data set

High-quality sequencing data generated for each strain (Table 1) was de novo assembled with coverage ranging from 49x to 270x. Analysis based on complete 16S rRNA sequence extracted from the whole genome sequences assigned them to 15 distinct genus and 29 species. It is also pertinent to note that genus/species assignment has been validated by a new QA protocol of NCBI during submission process. Here, the “input fasta sequences are BLASTed against a collection of 23 bacterial ribosomal protein COG families during submission.” Multilocus phylogenetic tree based on marker genes further supports the distinction between different groups of bacteria (Figure 1) to strain level. Description of the strains assigned to 15 different genera is provided below:
Figure 1

Multi locus sequence analysis of rice seed associated bacterial isolates constructed using 10 phylogenomic marker genes with Neighbor-Joining method and 500 bootstrap replications. Bacterial strains belonging to different phylum; Proteobacteria (α, β, and γ), Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, are highlighted with different background colors. Strains belonging to each species are grouped together with high boot strap values.

Multi locus sequence analysis of rice seed associated bacterial isolates constructed using 10 phylogenomic marker genes with Neighbor-Joining method and 500 bootstrap replications. Bacterial strains belonging to different phylum; Proteobacteria (α, β, and γ), Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, are highlighted with different background colors. Strains belonging to each species are grouped together with high boot strap values.

Genus: Kocuria

Kocuria is a gram-positive bacterium, belonging to phylum Actinobacteria. Seven isolates (SA11, SA12, SA13, SA14, SA15, RSA5, and RSA28) belonging to this genus were sequenced from two different libraries and two different year lots. Complete 16S rRNA typing has assigned the seven isolates to same species Kocuria kristinae. Further ANI analysis showed the seven strains have genome level identity >99.8%, much above the cut-off of 94–96% for delineation of species (Konstantinidis and Tiedje, 2005; Richter and Rosselló-Móra, 2009) and suggests their monophyletic/clonal nature. Interestingly only in case of Kocuria, a single species was detected even after having multiple strains.

Genus: Curtobacterium

Curtobacterium is also a gram-positive bacterium belonging to phylum Actinobacteria and class Microbacteriaceae. Four isolates of Curtobacterium were obtained from seed microbiome that belong to three different species on the basis of 16S rRNA sequences i.e. Curtobacterium luteum (NS184), Curtobacterium citreum (NS330), and Curtobacterium oceanosedimentum (NS263, NS359), sequenced from two different libraries. ANI values amongst the genomes of four strains also support the presence of three species.

Genus: Leucobacter

Leucobacter is another gram-positive Actinobacteria, belonging to class Microbacteriaceae. One isolate NS354 belonging to this genus was isolated from rice seeds and was assigned to Leucobacter chromiiresistens on the basis of 16S rRNA sequences.

Genus: Microbacterium

Microbacterium is another gram-positive Actinobacteria and six isolates from rice seeds were assigned to genus Microbacterium. These isolates were extracted from three different libraries and two different rice lots. 16S rRNA sequences assigned them into two different species Microbacterium testaceum (NS183, NS206, NS220, NS283, and RSA3) and Microbacterium oxydans (NS234), while ANI values suggest NS220 to be a different species as the values are less than 87.5% with all the other strains.

Genus: Exiguobacterium

Exiguobacterium is a gram-positive bacterium that is assigned to phylum Firmicutes. Two isolates (RSA11 and RSA42) belonging to this genus were isolated from one library and assigned to same species Exiguobacterium indicum on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequences. While ANI value amongst these two strains is 94.33%, very close to the cut-off for species delineation, suggesting that these two strains may belong to two different species.

Genus: Staphylococcus

Staphylococcus is also a gram-positive Firmicutes and 15 different strains were selected for sequencing from this genus belonging to four different libraries and three different year rice production lots. 16S rRNA sequences have assigned them to four different species Staphylococcus epidermidis (SA6, SA8, SB7b, SB7c), Staphylococcus warneri (SA9, SA10, NS346), Staphylococcus xylosus (NS341), and Staphylococcus sciuri (NS1, NS36, NS44, NS53, NS112, NS202, RSA37). Estimated ANI values also support the species distinction between the four groups as they are above the cut-off for species delineation.

Genus: Paenibacillus

Paenibacillus is the bacterium belonging to gram-variable Firmicutes. One strain NS115 belonging to Paenibacillus jamilae was isolated from rice seed environment.

Genus: Aureimonas

Aureimonas is a gram-negative bacterium belonging to α-Proteobacteria. Two strains belonging to species Aureimonas ureilytica (NS226, NS365) were isolated from the rice seeds in two different preparations and they have ANI value of 96.91%.

Genus: Methylobacterium

Another gram-negative bacterium belonging to α-Proteobacteria, Methylobacterium was also isolated from rice seed environment. Five isolates from two different year rice lots belonging to two different species were extracted, Methylobacterium radiotolerans (SB2, SB3), and Methylobacterium aquaticum (NS228, NS229, NS230). ANI values also confirmed the delineation of two species.

Genus: Novosphingobium

One bacterial isolate belonging to Novosphingobium barchaimii NS277 was isolated that is also a gram negative α-Proteobacteria.

Genus: Sphingomonas

Sphingomonas is another gram-negative α-Proteobacteria. Five isolates belonging to three different species Sphingomonas sanguinis (SB4, NS258, and NS319), Sphingomonas endophytica (NS334) and Sphingomonas yabuuchiae (NS355) were identified using 16S rRNA gene sequences. ANI values further confirmed the species delineation.

Genus: Pseudacidovorax

Pseudacidovorax is a gram-negative β-Proteobacteria. One isolate belonging to Pseudacidovorax intermedius NS331 was isolated from rice seeds.

Genus: Enterobacter

Enterobacter is a gram-negative bacteria belonging to family Enterobacteriaceae of γ-Proteobacteria. Bacterial isolates belonging to this genus were isolated from three different libraries and two rice lots. Eighteen isolates were sequenced belonging to three different species on the basis of 16S rRNA sequence i.e. Enterobacter asburia (NS7, NS23, and NS34), Enterobacter xiangfangensis (NS19, NS24, NS28, NS29, NS49, NS57, NS64, NS75, NS80, NS371, RSA8), and Enterobacter cancerogenus (NS31, NS104, NS111, NS188). ANI values amongst all Enterobacter asburia and E. xiangfangensis strains is more than 99.9%, suggesting that isolates actually belong to one species only while their ANI value with E. cancerogenus strains is around 86%.

Genus: Pantoea

Pantoea is also a gram-negative bacteria belonging to family Enterobacteriaceae of γ-Proteobacteria. Pantoea strains were isolated from four different libraries from all rice lots. Seventeen different bacterial isolates were sequenced belonging to this genus with three different species Pantoea dispersa (SA2, SA3, SA4, SA5, NS215, NS375, NS380, NS389, RSA31), Pantoea stewartii (NS381, RSA13, RSA30, RSA36), and Pantoea ananatis (NS296, NS303, NS311, and RSA47). These isolates grouping to different species were also supported by genome based taxonomy method ANI.

Genus: Pseudomonas

The gram-negative γ-Proteobacteria Pseudomonas was isolated from each year rice lot and each library preparation. Fifteen isolates were sequenced that were assigned to two different species on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, Pseudomonas psychrotolerans (SB5, SB8, SB9, SB11, SB14, SB18, NS2, NS201, NS274, NS337, NS376, NS383, RSA46), and Pseudomonas parafulva (NS96, NS212). While ANI analysis suggests the presence of three different species as NS337 has ANI values less than 88.5% with all other isolates.

Author contributions

SM, KB, and VC carried out the bacterial isolations from rice seeds and their identification using 16S rRNA gene sequences. DNA isolation, QC and sequence assembly was performed by KB and SS. SM, KB, and SS did the library preparation for high throughput sequencing, run analysis and analyzed strains for genome based taxonomy. NK and PPP carried out the revival of strains for sequencing and helped in sequin file preparation. PBP conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  7 in total

1.  Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis.

Authors:  R Jain; M C Rivera; J A Lake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species.

Authors:  Ok-Sun Kim; Yong-Joon Cho; Kihyun Lee; Seok-Hwan Yoon; Mincheol Kim; Hyunsoo Na; Sang-Cheol Park; Yoon Seong Jeon; Jae-Hak Lee; Hana Yi; Sungho Won; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes.

Authors:  Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition.

Authors:  Michael Richter; Ramon Rosselló-Móra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bacterial populations associated with rice seed in the tropical environment.

Authors:  B Cottyn; E Regalado; B Lanoot; M De Cleene; T W Mew; J Swings
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference.

Authors:  Martin Wu; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 13.583

  7 in total
  16 in total

1.  Investigating the Phylogenetic Range of Gibberellin Biosynthesis in Bacteria.

Authors:  Raimund Nagel; Reuben J Peters
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Xanthomonas indica sp. nov., a Novel Member of Non-Pathogenic Xanthomonas Community from Healthy Rice Seeds.

Authors:  Rekha Rana; Vishnu Narayanan Madhavan; Tanu Saroha; Kanika Bansal; Amandeep Kaur; Ramesh V Sonti; Hitendra K Patel; Prabhu B Patil
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.343

3.  Deciphering core phyllomicrobiome assemblage on rice genotypes grown in contrasting agroclimatic zones: implications for phyllomicrobiome engineering against blast disease.

Authors:  Kuleshwar Prasad Sahu; A Kumar; K Sakthivel; Bhaskar Reddy; Mukesh Kumar; Asharani Patel; Neelam Sheoran; Subbaiyan Gopalakrishnan; Ganesan Prakash; Rajeev Rathour; R K Gautam
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Comparative Genomics Analysis of a New Exiguobacterium Strain from Salar de Huasco Reveals a Repertoire of Stress-Related Genes and Arsenic Resistance.

Authors:  Juan Castro-Severyn; Francisco Remonsellez; Sandro L Valenzuela; Cesar Salinas; Jonathan Fortt; Pablo Aguilar; Coral Pardo-Esté; Cristina Dorador; Raquel Quatrini; Franck Molina; Daniel Aguayo; Eduardo Castro-Nallar; Claudia P Saavedra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Core Microbiome of Medicinal Plant Salvia miltiorrhiza Seed: A Rich Reservoir of Beneficial Microbes for Secondary Metabolism?

Authors:  Haimin Chen; Hongxia Wu; Bin Yan; Hongguang Zhao; Fenghua Liu; Haihua Zhang; Qing Sheng; Fang Miao; Zongsuo Liang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Phylogenomic, Pan-genomic, Pathogenomic and Evolutionary Genomic Insights into the Agronomically Relevant Enterobacteria Pantoea ananatis and Pantoea stewartii.

Authors:  Pieter De Maayer; Habibu Aliyu; Surendra Vikram; Jochen Blom; Brion Duffy; Don A Cowan; Theo H M Smits; Stephanus N Venter; Teresa A Coutinho
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The differences and overlaps in the seed-resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages.

Authors:  Ya Dai; Xin-Yu Li; Yan Wang; Cai-Xia Li; Yuan He; Hong-Hui Lin; Tao Wang; Xin-Rong Ma
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Tridecaptin M, a New Variant Discovered in Mud Bacterium, Shows Activity against Colistin- and Extremely Drug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Manoj Jangra; Manpreet Kaur; Rushikesh Tambat; Rohit Rana; Sushil K Maurya; Neeraj Khatri; Abdul Ghafur; Hemraj Nandanwar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Characterization and Salt Response in Recurrent Halotolerant Exiguobacterium sp. SH31 Isolated From Sediments of Salar de Huasco, Chilean Altiplano.

Authors:  Francisco Remonsellez; Juan Castro-Severyn; Coral Pardo-Esté; Pablo Aguilar; Jonathan Fortt; Cesar Salinas; Sergio Barahona; Joice León; Bárbara Fuentes; Carlos Areche; Klaudia L Hernández; Daniel Aguayo; Claudia P Saavedra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Functional Microbial Features Driving Community Assembly During Seed Germination and Emergence.

Authors:  Gloria Torres-Cortés; Sophie Bonneau; Olivier Bouchez; Clémence Genthon; Martial Briand; Marie-Agnès Jacques; Matthieu Barret
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.