| Literature DB >> 26792598 |
Gabriela Alarcón1, Julieta Roco1, Analia Medina2, Carina Van Nieuwenhove2,3, Mirta Medina2, Susana Jerez4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomarkers for cardiometabolic risk (CMR) factors would be important tools to maximize the effectiveness of dietary interventions to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Thus, the aim of this work was to analyze stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) indexes and n-6/n-3 fatty acids (FA) ratio as biomarkers of CMR induced by feeding rabbits on high fat diets (HFDs).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26792598 PMCID: PMC4719578 DOI: 10.1186/s12929-016-0235-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1021-7770 Impact factor: 8.410
Composition of experimental diets (g/100 g diet)
| CD | HD | HFD | HFD-HD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates | 34 | 34 | 34 | 34 |
| Protein | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Fiber | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Total fat | 3 | 3 | 18 | 18 |
| Fatty acids | ||||
| 14:0 (Miristic acid) | 0.27 ± 0.1 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| C16:0 (Palmitic acid) | 18.9 ± 0.1 | 16.7 ± 0.47 | 21.25 ± 0.35 | 20.3 ± 0.28 |
| C18:0 (Stearic acid) | 1.62 ± 0.3 | 2.32 ± 0.13 | 2.4 ± 0.14 | 2.02 ± 0.14 |
| Total SFA | 21.4 ± 0.1 | 19.2 ± 0.5 | 23.9 ± 0.35 | 22.6 ± 0.28 |
| 16:1 n-7 (Palmitoleic acid) | 0.13 ± 0.1 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.02 |
| 18:1 n-9 (Oleic acid) | 17.2 ± 0.1 | 14.3 ± 0.37 | 22.15 ± 0.35 | 21.75 ± 0.29 |
| Total MUFA | 17.6 ± 0.1 | 15.6 ± 0.4 | 22.37 ± 0.3 | 22.1 ± 0.3 |
| 18:2 n-6 (Linoleic acid) | 50.0 ± 0.5 | 60.2 ± 0.42 | 49.4 ± 0.14 | 51.3 ± 0.56 |
| 18:3 n-3 (Linolenic acid) | 6.3 ± 0.04 | 6.35 ± 0.21 | 4.51 ± 0.13 | 4.06 ± 0.35 |
| Total PUFA | 56.7 ± 0.5 | 66.6 ± 0.4 | 53.9 ± 0.14 | 55.36 ± 0.56 |
| Total calories (Kcal/100) | 250 | 250 | 412 | 412 |
SFA saturated fatty acids, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acids
Plasma levels of lipids, glucose and body weight values from rabbits fed a control diet (CD), a CD supplemented with 18 % fat (HFD), a high cholesterol diet (HD), a HD supplemented with 18 % fat (HFD-HD)
| CD | HD | HFD | HFD-HD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body Weight (g) | 2138 ± 82 | 1896 ± 96 | 2043 ± 46 | 1845 ± 48 |
| Visceral abdominal fat (g) | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.4 ± 0.05 | 2.07 ± 0.2a | 1.44 ± 0.1a |
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dl) | 98.5 ± 3.2 | 108.9 ± 4.7 | 132.8 ± 8.8a | 148 ± 6a |
| Blood pressure (MAP) (mmHg) | 62.7 ± 5.1 | 75.8 ± 2.3 | 62 ± 7.1 | 77.4 ± 9 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 59.0 ± 6.0 | 872.3 ± 114a | 64.7 ± 4.8 | 1793 ± 97a,b |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 23.8 ± 3.1 | 666 ± 99a | 27.1 ± 3.4 | 1391 ± 108a,b |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 58.8 ± 4.1 | 164 ± 45a | 29.4 ± 5.7a | 197 ± 38a |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 92 ± 14 | 222 ± 33a | 155.6 ± 40a | 253 ± 27a |
Data are expressed as mean ± SE of 8 rabbits. a P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between rabbits fed a HFD and HFD-HD with respect to rabbits fed a CD. b P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between rabbits fed a HFD-HD and rabbits fed a HD (two way ANOVA and Duncan’s post test)
Fig. 1Plasma glucose levels at base line (0 minutes) and at indicated time points after injection of 2 g/kg of glucose from rabbits fed a control diet (CD) and rabbits fed a high cholesterol diet (HD), high fat diet (HFD) or HFD supplemented with 1 % cholesterol (HFD-HD). Data are mean ± SE of 8 animals. *P <0.05 indicates statistically significant differences compared with arteries from rabbits fed a CD
Plasma fatty acids (expressed as % total fatty acids)
| CD | HD | HFD | HFD-HD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satured fatty acids (SFA) | ||||
| 16:0 (Palmitic acid) | 22.5 ± 0.9 | 29.8 ± 1.1a,b | 22.9 ± 0.5 | 24.1 ± 0.3 |
| 18:0 (Stearic acid) | 15.1 ± 0.5 | 8.3 ± 0.4a,b | 18.7 ± 0.03a | 19.5 ± 0.08a |
| Total SFA | 37.6 ± 0.8 | 38.1 ± 0.2 | 41.6 ± 0.5a | 43.6 ± 0.3a |
| Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) | ||||
| 16:1 n-7 (Palmitoleic acid) | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.2a,b | 0.7 ± 0.06a | 0.34 ± 0.03a,c |
| 18:1 n-9 (Oleic acid) | 27.7 ± 1.8 | 21.0 ± 0.8a | 14.8 ± 0.2a | 10.6 ± 0.2a,c |
| Total MUFA | 28.7 ± 0.1 | 24.0 ± 0.5 | 15.5 ± 0.2a | 11 ± 0.2a,c |
| 18:3 n-3 (Linolenic acid) | 1 ± 0.14 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.03a | 0.3 ± 0.002a,c |
| 22:6 n-3 (Docosahexaenoic acid) | 1.97 ± 0.07 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | Not-detected | Not-detected |
| 20:5 n-3 (Eicosapentaenoic acid) | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | Not-detected | Not-detected |
| 18:2 n-6 (Linoleic acid) | 26.4 ± 1.0 | 25.5 ± 2.0 | 34 ± 0.8a | 37.4 ± 0.6a,c |
| 20:4 n-6 (Arachidonic acid) | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 6.3 ± 0.3a,b | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.4 |
| Total PUFA | 32.4 ± 0.5 | 36.0 ± 0.5 | 34.8 ± 0.8 | 42.3 ± 0.6a,c |
| n-6/n-3 ratio | 9.2 ± 1.1 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 48.8 ± 0.8a | 140 ± 0.6a,c |
| SCD-16 | 0.044 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.01a,b | 0.03 ± 0.005 | 0.014 ± 0.002a |
| SCD-18 | 1.83 ± 0.02 | 2.53 ± 0.02a,b | 0.79 ± 0.01a | 0.54 ± 0.03a,c |
Data are expressed as mean ± SE of 8 rabbits. a P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences with respect to rabbits fed a CD. b P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between rabbits fed a HD and the other diet groups. c P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between rabbits fed a HFD-HD and the other diet groups (two-way ANOVA and Duncan’s post test)
Pearson correlation coefficients between plasma SCD-16, SCD-18 and n-6/n-3 fatty acids ratio and visceral abdominal fat, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)
| SCD-16 | SCD-18 | n-6/n-3 FA ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visceral abdominal fat (g) | −0.35 | −0.46 | 0.13 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | −0.14 | −0.18 | 0.25 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | −0.045 | −0.1 | 0.61 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | −0.08 | −0.06 | 0.59 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | −0.004 | −0.004 | 0.26 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | −0.002 | −0.004 | 0.21 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 0.013 | 0.06 | 0.009 |
P < 0.05 was statistically significant