OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel double-screw (cross trajectory) technique that combines use of the traditional trajectory (TT) and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and to investigate its fixation strength quantitatively by finite element (FE) analysis. METHODS: Three-dimensional FE models of 30 osteoporotic L4 vertebrae (patients' mean age: 77.3 ± 7.4 years, 11 men and 19 women) were computationally created. Each vertebral model was implanted with bilateral pedicle screws by TT (using 7.5 mm × 40 mm screws), CBT (using 5.5 mm × 35 mm screws) and cross trajectory (combined use of TT screws of 5.5 mm × 40 mm and CBT screws of 5.5 mm × 35 mm) and compared among three groups. The vertebral fixation strength of a bilateral-screw construct was examined by applying forces simulating flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation to the vertebrae by non-linear FE analyses. RESULTS: Fixation strength using the cross trajectory was the highest among the three different techniques (P < 0.01). The cross trajectory construct demonstrated 320% higher strength than the TT construct in flexion, 293% higher in extension, 102% higher in lateral bending, and 40% higher in axial rotation (P < 0.01). Similarly, the cross trajectory construct showed 268% higher strength than the CBT construct in flexion, 269% higher in extension, 210% higher in lateral bending, and 178% in axial rotation (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The cross trajectory technique offered superior fixation strength over the TT and CBT techniques in each plane of motion. This technique may be a valid option for posterior fusion, especially in osteoporotic spine.
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel double-screw (cross trajectory) technique that combines use of the traditional trajectory (TT) and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and to investigate its fixation strength quantitatively by finite element (FE) analysis. METHODS: Three-dimensional FE models of 30 osteoporotic L4 vertebrae (patients' mean age: 77.3 ± 7.4 years, 11 men and 19 women) were computationally created. Each vertebral model was implanted with bilateral pedicle screws by TT (using 7.5 mm × 40 mm screws), CBT (using 5.5 mm × 35 mm screws) and cross trajectory (combined use of TT screws of 5.5 mm × 40 mm and CBT screws of 5.5 mm × 35 mm) and compared among three groups. The vertebral fixation strength of a bilateral-screw construct was examined by applying forces simulating flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation to the vertebrae by non-linear FE analyses. RESULTS: Fixation strength using the cross trajectory was the highest among the three different techniques (P < 0.01). The cross trajectory construct demonstrated 320% higher strength than the TT construct in flexion, 293% higher in extension, 102% higher in lateral bending, and 40% higher in axial rotation (P < 0.01). Similarly, the cross trajectory construct showed 268% higher strength than the CBT construct in flexion, 269% higher in extension, 210% higher in lateral bending, and 178% in axial rotation (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The cross trajectory technique offered superior fixation strength over the TT and CBT techniques in each plane of motion. This technique may be a valid option for posterior fusion, especially in osteoporotic spine.
Authors: Juan Delgado-Fernandez; Maria Ángeles García-Pallero; Guillermo Blasco; Paloma Pulido-Rivas; Rafael G Sola Journal: Asian Spine J Date: 2017-10-11