Literature DB >> 26792022

Clinical outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures treated with polyaxial locking plates.

M F Hoffmann1, S Lotzien2, T A Schildhauer2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common procedures in the increasing older population. According to the AAOS, approximately 19,200 Americans are actually living with ipsilateral prosthetic hip and knee leading to 240 interprosthetic fractures annually. Few reviews and case reports give an idea of the obvious problem to achieve consolidation in interprosthetic fractures. Preconfigured plates have been shown to be superior compared with other treatments in patients with stable components. Utilization of internal fixators for interprosthetic fractures might be advantageous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interprosthetic femoral fractures with polyaxial locking plate treatment in regard to surgical procedure, complications, and clinical outcome.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2012, 143 patients underwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic femur fractures. Thirty-two fractures were identified as interprosthetic fractures. Five patients were excluded. Fractures were classified according to OTA/AO system, Vancouver, Rorabeck, Soenen and Pires. Trauma fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons performed the surgeries using a NCB-construct (Zimmer Inc., Warshaw, IN). Plate choice was determined according to radiographic classification. Submuscular plate insertion was performed if possible. Complications were recorded concerning infection, union, fixation failure, and revision surgery.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified. There were 92.6% females. Follow-up by regular outpatient clinic visits was 24 months. Surface replacements were found in 18 TKA. Nine patients had a stemmed femur component of their TKA. 89% healed after the index procedure. Three patients developed a nonunion with 1 construct leading to hardware failure. Previous revision THA or Pires/modified Vancouver classification did not influence nonunion formation, but all patients with nonunion formation were classified as AO/OTA type B (p=0.001). These fractures were treated with longer plates (p=0.015), but with similar working length (p=0.400). Plate design, additional cerclages, or submuscular insertion did not influence nonunion formation.
CONCLUSION: Interprosthetic fracture treatment remains challenging. NCB-locked plating can achieve satisfactory results. Additional soft tissue damage can be prevented by submuscular plate insertion. Treatment of type B fractures resulted in significantly greater nonunion rate. Therefore, consideration of the individual fracture type is essential to determine plate length, plate type, and additional bone grafting or BMP supplementation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Femur; Interprosthetic fracture; Locked plating; Nonunion; Periprosthetic fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26792022     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the surgical outcomes of interprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Brian M Rao; Phillip Stokey; Mina Tanios; Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-31

2.  Classifications in Brief: Pires Classification of Interprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Rohan A Gheewala; Joseph R Young
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Treatment Algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracturens.

Authors:  Nicola Mondanelli; Elisa Troiano; Andrea Facchini; Roberta Ghezzi; Martina Di Meglio; Nicolò Nuvoli; Giacomo Peri; Pietro Aiuto; Giovanni Battista Colasanti; Stefano Giannotti
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-10

4.  Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and retained total knee arthroplasty treated with polyaxial locking plates: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Lotzien; Clemens Hoberg; Martin F Hoffmann; Thomas A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-22

5.  Interprosthetic Femoral Fractures Surgical Treatment in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Marios Loucas; Rafael Loucas; Nico Safa Akhavan; Patrick Fries; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-04

Review 6.  Interprosthetic femoral fractures: management challenges.

Authors:  Joshua C Rozell; Dimitri E Delagrammaticas; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2019-09-16

7.  Use of the Locking Attachment Plate for Internal Fixation of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Bryce Wall; Jeffrey B Stambough; Steven M Cherney; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-03

8.  Peri-Implant Fractures Distal to an Antegrade Femoral Nail: A Case Series.

Authors:  T Jegathesan; B K Ernest-Kwek
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2016-03

9.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.