Literature DB >> 26791931

Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk Identification.

Sangeet Ghai1, Gregg Eure2, Vincent Fradet2, Matthew E Hyndman2, Theresa McGrath2, Brian Wodlinger2, Christian P Pavlovich2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conventional ultrasound systems operate at 6 to 9 MHz and serve as the standard of care to guide prostate biopsies. We present a protocol using a novel high resolution (29 MHz) transrectal prostate micro-ultrasound system. This protocol includes a scoring system to assess the risk of prostatic carcinoma and enable real-time targeted biopsies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ExactVu™ system is currently being used in a multisite, 2,000-patient, randomized clinical trial. Cine loops of 400 biopsies from this trial were used to create the PRI-MUS™ (prostate risk identification using micro-ultrasound) protocol and risk scale. Validation was performed in an independent, pathology blinded set of 100 cines. Three of the 5 investigators performing this validation were familiar with micro-ultrasound but naïve to the PRI-MUS protocol and they received only 1 hour of training.
RESULTS: Each increase in risk score demonstrated a 10.1% increase (95% CI 9.3-10.8) in the probability of clinically significant cancer. The risk score also increased with Gleason sum and cancer length with a slope of 0.15 (95% CI 0.09-0.21) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.43-0.73), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 37%, respectively, and the mean ± SD ROC AUC was 60% ± 2%. The protocol was more accurate for detecting high grade disease (Gleason sum greater than 7) with a peak AUC of 74% (mean 66%).
CONCLUSIONS: The new resolution of the micro-ultrasound platform paired with the PRI-MUS protocol shows promise for real-time visualization of suspicious lesions and targeting of biopsies. The improved performance of the protocol in more significant disease is consistent with the focus of the field on decreasing insignificant diagnoses and detecting high risk disease early.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; clinical protocols; diagnostic imaging; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791931     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

Review 1.  Techniques and Outcomes of MRI-TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Masatomo Kaneko; Dordaneh Sugano; Amir H Lebastchi; Vinay Duddalwar; Jamal Nabhani; Christopher Haiman; Inderbir S Gill; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Andre Luis Abreu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  [Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].

Authors:  J Bründl; J Breyer; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  High-resolution microultrasound imaging for bladder cancer: the birth of a new diagnostic tool?

Authors:  Marta Bottero; Emanuele Alì; Chiara Demofonti; Andrea Lancia; Riccardo Santoni; Cynthia Aristei; Gianluca Ingrosso
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  Contemporary treatments in prostate cancer focal therapy.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Amir H Lebastchi; Baris Turkbey; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  Use of high-resolution micro-ultrasound to predict extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer prior to surgery: a prospective single-institutional study.

Authors:  Vittorio Fasulo; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Federica Regis; Marco Paciotti; Fancesco Persico; Davide Maffei; Alessandro Uleri; Alberto Saita; Paolo Casale; Rodolfo Hurle; Massimo Lazzeri; Giorgio Guazzoni; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  The role of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for patients with known prostate cancer within an active surveillance pathway: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pamela Parker; Maureen Twiddy; Paul Whybrow; Alan Rigby; Matthew Simms
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 7.  [Sonography of the prostate : Relevance for urologists in daily clinical routine].

Authors:  Maria Apfelbeck; Dirk-André Clevert; Christian G Stief; Michael Chaloupka
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and micro-ultrasound for visualizing prostate cancer in an active surveillance population: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Gregg Eure; Daryl Fanney; Jefferson Lin; Brian Wodlinger; Sangeet Ghai
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A multicenter, prospective analysis.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Giovanni Lughezzani; Davide Maffei; Andrea Sánchez; José Gregorio Pereira; Frédéric Staerman; Hannes Cash; Ferdinand Luger; Laurent Lopez; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Rob Abouassaly; Neal D Shore; Gregg Eure; Marco Paciotti; Ander Astobieta; Laura Wiemer; Sebastian Hofbauer; Robin Heckmann; Andreas Gusenleitner; Jasmin Kaar; Clemens Mayr; Wolfgang Loidl; Jean Rouffilange; Richard Gaston; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Klein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  New imaging modalities to consider for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Authors:  Yasin Bhanji; Steven P Rowe; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.