Literature DB >> 26791725

An improved limit on the charge of antihydrogen from stochastic acceleration.

M Ahmadi1, M Baquero-Ruiz2,3, W Bertsche4,5, E Butler6,7, A Capra8, C Carruth2, C L Cesar9, M Charlton10, A E Charman2, S Eriksson10, L T Evans2, N Evetts11, J Fajans2, T Friesen12, M C Fujiwara13, D R Gill13, A Gutierrez11, J S Hangst12, W N Hardy11, M E Hayden14, C A Isaac10, A Ishida7, S A Jones10, S Jonsell15, L Kurchaninov13, N Madsen10, D Maxwell10, J T K McKenna13, S Menary8, J M Michan13, T Momose16, J J Munich14, P Nolan1, K Olchanski13, A Olin13,17, A Povilus2, P Pusa1, C Ø Rasmussen12, F Robicheaux18, R L Sacramento9, M Sameed10, E Sarid19, D M Silveira9, C So2, T D Tharp12, R I Thompson20, D P van der Werf10, J S Wurtele2,21, A I Zhmoginov2.   

Abstract

Antimatter continues to intrigue physicists because of its apparent absence in the observable Universe. Current theory requires that matter and antimatter appeared in equal quantities after the Big Bang, but the Standard Model of particle physics offers no quantitative explanation for the apparent disappearance of half the Universe. It has recently become possible to study trapped atoms of antihydrogen to search for possible, as yet unobserved, differences in the physical behaviour of matter and antimatter. Here we consider the charge neutrality of the antihydrogen atom. By applying stochastic acceleration to trapped antihydrogen atoms, we determine an experimental bound on the antihydrogen charge, Qe, of |Q| < 0.71 parts per billion (one standard deviation), in which e is the elementary charge. This bound is a factor of 20 less than that determined from the best previous measurement of the antihydrogen charge. The electrical charge of atoms and molecules of normal matter is known to be no greater than about 10(-21)e for a diverse range of species including H2, He and SF6. Charge-parity-time symmetry and quantum anomaly cancellation demand that the charge of antihydrogen be similarly small. Thus, our measurement constitutes an improved limit and a test of fundamental aspects of the Standard Model. If we assume charge superposition and use the best measured value of the antiproton charge, then we can place a new limit on the positron charge anomaly (the relative difference between the positron and elementary charge) of about one part per billion (one standard deviation), a 25-fold reduction compared to the current best measurement.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791725     DOI: 10.1038/nature16491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  12 in total

1.  Trapped antihydrogen in its ground state.

Authors:  G Gabrielse; R Kalra; W S Kolthammer; R McConnell; P Richerme; D Grzonka; W Oelert; T Sefzick; M Zielinski; D W Fitzakerley; M C George; E A Hessels; C H Storry; M Weel; A Müllers; J Walz
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Electric charges of positrons and antiprotons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1992-07-27       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Trapped antihydrogen.

Authors:  G B Andresen; M D Ashkezari; M Baquero-Ruiz; W Bertsche; P D Bowe; E Butler; C L Cesar; S Chapman; M Charlton; A Deller; S Eriksson; J Fajans; T Friesen; M C Fujiwara; D R Gill; A Gutierrez; J S Hangst; W N Hardy; M E Hayden; A J Humphries; R Hydomako; M J Jenkins; S Jonsell; L V Jørgensen; L Kurchaninov; N Madsen; S Menary; P Nolan; K Olchanski; A Olin; A Povilus; P Pusa; F Robicheaux; E Sarid; S Seif el Nasr; D M Silveira; C So; J W Storey; R I Thompson; D P van der Werf; J S Wurtele; Y Yamazaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Positron trapping in an electrostatic well by inelastic collisions with nitrogen molecules.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 3.140

5.  Measurement of the positronium 1 (3)S1-2 (3)S1 interval by continuous-wave two-photon excitation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron.

Authors:  J Baron; W C Campbell; D DeMille; J M Doyle; G Gabrielse; Y V Gurevich; P W Hess; N R Hutzler; E Kirilov; I Kozyryev; B R O'Leary; C D Panda; M F Parsons; E S Petrik; B Spaun; A C Vutha; A D West
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Two-photon laser spectroscopy of antiprotonic helium and the antiproton-to-electron mass ratio.

Authors:  Masaki Hori; Anna Sótér; Daniel Barna; Andreas Dax; Ryugo Hayano; Susanne Friedreich; Bertalan Juhász; Thomas Pask; Eberhard Widmann; Dezso Horváth; Luca Venturelli; Nicola Zurlo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Description and first application of a new technique to measure the gravitational mass of antihydrogen.

Authors:  A E Charman; C Amole; M D Ashkezari; M Baquero-Ruiz; W Bertsche; E Butler; A Capra; C L Cesar; M Charlton; S Eriksson; J Fajans; T Friesen; M C Fujiwara; D R Gill; A Gutierrez; J S Hangst; W N Hardy; M E Hayden; C A Isaac; S Jonsell; L Kurchaninov; A Little; N Madsen; J T K McKenna; S Menary; S C Napoli; P Nolan; A Olin; P Pusa; C Ø Rasmussen; F Robicheaux; E Sarid; D M Silveira; C So; R I Thompson; D P van der Werf; J S Wurtele; A I Zhmoginov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  On the Measurement of the Neutron Lifetime Using Ultracold Neutrons in a Vacuum Quadrupole Trap.

Authors:  J David Bowman; S I Penttila
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2005-08-01

10.  An experimental limit on the charge of antihydrogen.

Authors:  C Amole; M D Ashkezari; M Baquero-Ruiz; W Bertsche; E Butler; A Capra; C L Cesar; M Charlton; S Eriksson; J Fajans; T Friesen; M C Fujiwara; D R Gill; A Gutierrez; J S Hangst; W N Hardy; M E Hayden; C A Isaac; S Jonsell; L Kurchaninov; A Little; N Madsen; J T K McKenna; S Menary; S C Napoli; P Nolan; K Olchanski; A Olin; A Povilus; P Pusa; C Ø Rasmussen; F Robicheaux; E Sarid; D M Silveira; C So; T D Tharp; R I Thompson; D P van der Werf; Z Vendeiro; J S Wurtele; A I Zhmoginov; A E Charman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exotic atoms: Antimatter may matter.

Authors:  Thomas J Phillips
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Observation of the 1S-2S transition in trapped antihydrogen.

Authors:  M Ahmadi; B X R Alves; C J Baker; W Bertsche; E Butler; A Capra; C Carruth; C L Cesar; M Charlton; S Cohen; R Collister; S Eriksson; A Evans; N Evetts; J Fajans; T Friesen; M C Fujiwara; D R Gill; A Gutierrez; J S Hangst; W N Hardy; M E Hayden; C A Isaac; A Ishida; M A Johnson; S A Jones; S Jonsell; L Kurchaninov; N Madsen; M Mathers; D Maxwell; J T K McKenna; S Menary; J M Michan; T Momose; J J Munich; P Nolan; K Olchanski; A Olin; P Pusa; C Ø Rasmussen; F Robicheaux; R L Sacramento; M Sameed; E Sarid; D M Silveira; S Stracka; G Stutter; C So; T D Tharp; J E Thompson; R I Thompson; D P van der Werf; J S Wurtele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Precision measurements on trapped antihydrogen in the ALPHA experiment.

Authors:  S Eriksson
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Sixfold improved single particle measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton.

Authors:  H Nagahama; C Smorra; S Sellner; J Harrington; T Higuchi; M J Borchert; T Tanaka; M Besirli; A Mooser; G Schneider; K Blaum; Y Matsuda; C Ospelkaus; W Quint; J Walz; Y Yamazaki; S Ulmer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  In-beam measurement of the hydrogen hyperfine splitting and prospects for antihydrogen spectroscopy.

Authors:  M Diermaier; C B Jepsen; B Kolbinger; C Malbrunot; O Massiczek; C Sauerzopf; M C Simon; J Zmeskal; E Widmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Prospects for comparison of matter and antimatter gravitation with ALPHA-g.

Authors:  W A Bertsche
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Characterization of the 1S-2S transition in antihydrogen.

Authors:  M Ahmadi; B X R Alves; C J Baker; W Bertsche; A Capra; C Carruth; C L Cesar; M Charlton; S Cohen; R Collister; S Eriksson; A Evans; N Evetts; J Fajans; T Friesen; M C Fujiwara; D R Gill; J S Hangst; W N Hardy; M E Hayden; C A Isaac; M A Johnson; J M Jones; S A Jones; S Jonsell; A Khramov; P Knapp; L Kurchaninov; N Madsen; D Maxwell; J T K McKenna; S Menary; T Momose; J J Munich; K Olchanski; A Olin; P Pusa; C Ø Rasmussen; F Robicheaux; R L Sacramento; M Sameed; E Sarid; D M Silveira; G Stutter; C So; T D Tharp; R I Thompson; D P van der Werf; J S Wurtele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Laser cooling of antihydrogen atoms.

Authors:  C J Baker; W Bertsche; A Capra; C Carruth; C L Cesar; M Charlton; A Christensen; R Collister; A Cridland Mathad; S Eriksson; A Evans; N Evetts; J Fajans; T Friesen; M C Fujiwara; D R Gill; P Grandemange; P Granum; J S Hangst; W N Hardy; M E Hayden; D Hodgkinson; E Hunter; C A Isaac; M A Johnson; J M Jones; S A Jones; S Jonsell; A Khramov; P Knapp; L Kurchaninov; N Madsen; D Maxwell; J T K McKenna; S Menary; J M Michan; T Momose; P S Mullan; J J Munich; K Olchanski; A Olin; J Peszka; A Powell; P Pusa; C Ø Rasmussen; F Robicheaux; R L Sacramento; M Sameed; E Sarid; D M Silveira; D M Starko; C So; G Stutter; T D Tharp; A Thibeault; R I Thompson; D P van der Werf; J S Wurtele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.