Betsy Lozoff1, Yaping Jiang2, Xing Li3, Min Zhou4, Blair Richards5, Guobin Xu2, Katy M Clark5, Furong Liang3, Niko Kaciroti5, Gengli Zhao4, Denise Cc Santos6, Zhixiang Zhang3, Twila Tardif5, Ming Li7. 1. Center for Human Growth and Development and Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; mlixu@msn.com blozoff@umich.edu. 2. Clinical Laboratory. 3. Department of Pediatrics, and. 4. Women's and Children's Health Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; and. 5. Center for Human Growth and Development and. 6. Human Movement Sciences Graduate Program, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, Brazil. 7. Department of Pediatrics, and mlixu@msn.com blozoff@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous trials of iron supplementation in infancy did not consider maternal iron supplementation. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed effects of iron supplementation in infancy and/or pregnancy on infant iron status, illnesses, and growth at 9 mo. METHODS: Enrollment occurred from December 2009 to June 2012 in Hebei, China. Infants born to women in a pregnancy iron supplementation trial were randomly assigned 1:1 to iron [∼1 mg Fe/(kg · d) as oral iron proteinsuccynilate] or placebo from 6 wk to 9 mo, excluding infants with cord ferritin <35 μg/L. Study groups werepregnancy placebo/infancy placebo (placebo/placebo), pregnancy placebo/infancy iron (placebo/iron), pregnancy iron/infancy placebo (iron/placebo), and pregnancy iron/infancy iron (iron/iron). The primary outcome was 9-mo iron status: iron deficiency (ID) by cutoff (≥2 abnormal iron measures) or body iron <0 mg/kg and ID + anemia (hemoglobin <110 g/L). Secondary outcomes were doctor visits or hospitalizations and weight or length gain from birth to 9 mo. Statistical analysis by intention to treat and dose-response (between number of iron bottles received and outcome) used logistic regression with concomitant RRs and general linear models, with covariate control as applicable. RESULTS: Of 1482 infants randomly allocated, 1276 had 9-mo data (n = 312-327/group). Iron supplementation in infancy, but not pregnancy, reduced ID risk: RRs (95% CIs) were 0.89 (0.79, 0.998) for placebo/iron compared to placebo/placebo, 0.79 (0.63, 0.98) for placebo/iron compared to iron/placebo, 0.87 (0.77, 0.98) for iron/iron compared to placebo/placebo, and 0.86 (0.77, 0.97) for iron/iron compared to iron/placebo. However, >60% of infants still had ID at 9 mo. Receiving more bottles of iron in infancy was associated with better infant iron status at 9 mo but only among iron-supplemented infants whose mothers were also iron supplemented (i.e., the iron/iron group). There were no group differences in hospitalizations or illnesses and no adverse effects on growth overall or among infants who were iron sufficient at birth. CONCLUSIONS:Iron supplementation in Chinese infants reduced ID at 9 mo without adverse effects on growth or illness. Effects of iron supplementation in pregnancy were observed only when higher amounts of iron were distributed in infancy. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00613717.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous trials of iron supplementation in infancy did not consider maternal iron supplementation. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed effects of iron supplementation in infancy and/or pregnancy on infantiron status, illnesses, and growth at 9 mo. METHODS: Enrollment occurred from December 2009 to June 2012 in Hebei, China. Infants born to women in a pregnancy iron supplementation trial were randomly assigned 1:1 to iron [∼1 mg Fe/(kg · d) as oral iron proteinsuccynilate] or placebo from 6 wk to 9 mo, excluding infants with cord ferritin <35 μg/L. Study groups were pregnancy placebo/infancy placebo (placebo/placebo), pregnancy placebo/infancy iron (placebo/iron), pregnancy iron/infancy placebo (iron/placebo), and pregnancy iron/infancy iron (iron/iron). The primary outcome was 9-mo iron status: iron deficiency (ID) by cutoff (≥2 abnormal iron measures) or body iron <0 mg/kg and ID + anemia (hemoglobin <110 g/L). Secondary outcomes were doctor visits or hospitalizations and weight or length gain from birth to 9 mo. Statistical analysis by intention to treat and dose-response (between number of iron bottles received and outcome) used logistic regression with concomitant RRs and general linear models, with covariate control as applicable. RESULTS: Of 1482 infants randomly allocated, 1276 had 9-mo data (n = 312-327/group). Iron supplementation in infancy, but not pregnancy, reduced ID risk: RRs (95% CIs) were 0.89 (0.79, 0.998) for placebo/iron compared to placebo/placebo, 0.79 (0.63, 0.98) for placebo/iron compared to iron/placebo, 0.87 (0.77, 0.98) for iron/iron compared to placebo/placebo, and 0.86 (0.77, 0.97) for iron/iron compared to iron/placebo. However, >60% of infants still had ID at 9 mo. Receiving more bottles of iron in infancy was associated with better infantiron status at 9 mo but only among iron-supplemented infants whose mothers were also iron supplemented (i.e., the iron/iron group). There were no group differences in hospitalizations or illnesses and no adverse effects on growth overall or among infants who were iron sufficient at birth. CONCLUSIONS:Iron supplementation in Chinese infants reduced ID at 9 mo without adverse effects on growth or illness. Effects of iron supplementation in pregnancy were observed only when higher amounts of iron were distributed in infancy. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00613717.
Authors: Deanna K Olney; Ernesto Pollitt; Patricia K Kariger; Sabra S Khalfan; Nadra S Ali; James M Tielsch; Sunil Sazawal; Robert Black; Lindsay H Allen; Rebecca J Stoltzfus Journal: J Nutr Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Maureen M Black; Abdullah H Baqui; K Zaman; Lars Ake Persson; Shams El Arifeen; Katherine Le; Scot W McNary; Monowara Parveen; Jena D Hamadani; Robert E Black Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ashajyothi M Siddappa; Michael K Georgieff; Sandi Wewerka; Cathy Worwa; Charles A Nelson; Raye-Ann Deregnier Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: James K Friel; Khalid Aziz; Wayne L Andrews; Scott V Harding; Mary L Courage; Russell J Adams Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Staffan K Berglund; Anna Chmielewska; Josefine Starnberg; Björn Westrup; Bruno Hägglöf; Mikael Norman; Magnus Domellöf Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Rosa M Angulo-Barroso; Ming Li; Denise C C Santos; Yang Bian; Julie Sturza; Yaping Jiang; Niko Kaciroti; Blair Richards; Betsy Lozoff Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Denise C C Santos; Rosa M Angulo-Barroso; Ming Li; Yang Bian; Julie Sturza; Blair Richards; Betsy Lozoff Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Ajibola I Abioye; Emily A McDonald; Sangshin Park; Kelsey Ripp; Brady Bennett; Hannah W Wu; Sunthorn Pond-Tor; Marianne J Sagliba; Amabelle J Amoylen; Palmera I Baltazar; Veronica Tallo; Luz P Acosta; Remigio M Olveda; Jonathan D Kurtis; Jennifer F Friedman Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2019-05-26 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Ann M Weber; Marta Rubio-Codina; Susan P Walker; Stef van Buuren; Iris Eekhout; Sally M Grantham-McGregor; Maria Caridad Araujo; Susan M Chang; Lia Ch Fernald; Jena Derakhshani Hamadani; Charlotte Hanlon; Simone M Karam; Betsy Lozoff; Lisy Ratsifandrihamanana; Linda Richter; Maureen M Black Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2019-11-19