Kimberly Clinebell1, Robin Valpey2, Teresa Walker1, Priya Gopalan1, Pierre Azzam1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: valpeyre@upmc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the first medically-reported case of auto-enucleation was described in the mid-19th century, ocular self-gouging has long been depicted in historical legend and mythology. Cases of enucleation have since been identified across various cultures. Though relatively uncommon, this major form of self-mutilation now afflicts approximately 500 individuals per year, and may present more commonly among certain clinical populations. METHODS: We present 2 cases of self-enucleation in patients with psychotic illnesses and review existing literature on the history of enucleation, associated pathology, and management (both medically and psychiatrically) for this serious form of self-injury. RESULTS: Literature review includes a brief historical perspective of auto-enucleation and its context in psychosomatic medicine, with cases to highlight key aspects in the prevention and management of ocular self-injury. Normal eye pathology is described briefly, with a focus on medical care after self-inflicted damage, as pertinent to consultation psychiatrists. Interventions for behavioral and pharmacologic management of agitation and impulsivity are reviewed, including consideration for electroconvulsive therapy, in this particular context. CONCLUSION: Although severe ocular self-injury is uncommon, psychiatrists should be familiar with approaches to prevent and manage auto-enucleation in individuals at risk thereof. Consultation psychiatrists must work closely with ophthalmologists to address affective, behavioral, and cognitive triggers and complications of ocular self-injury.
BACKGROUND: Although the first medically-reported case of auto-enucleation was described in the mid-19th century, ocular self-gouging has long been depicted in historical legend and mythology. Cases of enucleation have since been identified across various cultures. Though relatively uncommon, this major form of self-mutilation now afflicts approximately 500 individuals per year, and may present more commonly among certain clinical populations. METHODS: We present 2 cases of self-enucleation in patients with psychotic illnesses and review existing literature on the history of enucleation, associated pathology, and management (both medically and psychiatrically) for this serious form of self-injury. RESULTS: Literature review includes a brief historical perspective of auto-enucleation and its context in psychosomatic medicine, with cases to highlight key aspects in the prevention and management of ocular self-injury. Normal eye pathology is described briefly, with a focus on medical care after self-inflicted damage, as pertinent to consultation psychiatrists. Interventions for behavioral and pharmacologic management of agitation and impulsivity are reviewed, including consideration for electroconvulsive therapy, in this particular context. CONCLUSION: Although severe ocular self-injury is uncommon, psychiatrists should be familiar with approaches to prevent and manage auto-enucleation in individuals at risk thereof. Consultation psychiatrists must work closely with ophthalmologists to address affective, behavioral, and cognitive triggers and complications of ocular self-injury.
Authors: José Dalma-Weiszhausz; José Arturo Oyervides Alvarado; Ana Maria Suarez Licona; Miriam Tatiana Serment Azuara; Alejandro Dalma Kende Journal: Turk J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-02-25