| Literature DB >> 26791082 |
Yun Xie1, JunLan Yang2, Peng Zhao3, Hui Jia4, Qi Wang5.
Abstract
Sensitive and efficient detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women is essential for prescription of prophylaxis at the time of delivery as GBS is an opportunistic pathogen known to cause infant mortality. In this report, two studies were conducted on the methods of GBS detection in Shaanxi province, China, a region lacking data for GBS detection and occurrence. For Study 1, 100 GBS culture-positive vaginal swabs were collected from 1,567 pregnant women for evaluation by direct latex agglutination test. In Study 2, 200 GBS vaginal swabs were evaluated by three culture methods (sheep blood agar (SBA), Columbia colistin-nalidixic agar (CNA), and selective carrot broth (SCB)) followed by analysis using a latex agglutination test. GBS was detected in 6.4 % of specimens in Study 1 and 10.5 % of specimens in Study 2. The results of the latex agglutination test in both studies were accurate with samples exhibiting high to moderate GBS growth, but the accuracy declined for samples with low GBS growth. The evaluation of culture methods for GBS detection revealed the sensitivity of SCB (95.2 %, p = 0.004) was significantly higher than that of the SBA medium (57.1 %). The sensitivity reported for SCB (95.2 %) was higher than CNA (76.0 %), but the difference was not statistically significant (p =0.078). These results indicate a selective broth, such as SCB, is ideal for accuracy at low growth levels, but a direct latex agglutination test could be used as an alternative for rapid detection of GBS in circumstances requiring immediate detection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26791082 PMCID: PMC4721209 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-016-0463-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Fig. 1Laboratory procedure of the vaginal specimens for the isolation and latex agglutination test of GBS
Latex agglutination test results as compared with different density levels of GBS for 100 culture-positive specimens
| Density level of GBS (c.f.u. per swab) | No. of samples tested positive ( | No. of samples positive for GBS ( | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (>100) | 22 | 22 | 22/22 (100 %) | 22/22 (100 %) | 22/22 (100 %) | 22/22 (100 %) |
| Moderate (50–100) | 27 | 27 | 27/27 (100 %) | 27/27 (100 %) | 27/27 (100 %) | 27/27 (100 %) |
| Low (10–50) | 24 | 36 | 24/36 (66.7 %) | 36/36 (100 %) | 24/24 (100 %) | 36/48 (75.0 %) |
| Little (<10) | 2 | 15 | 2/15 (13.3 %) | 15/15 (100 %) | 2/2 (100 %) | 15/28 (53.6 %) |
Comparison of results for SBA, CNA, and the selective broth for detection of GBS
| Culture medium | GBS positive samples ( | Vaginal swabs ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBS isolation rate (%) | Sensitivity (%)a | ||
| SBA | 12 | 6.0 | 57.1 |
| CNA | 16 | 8.0 | 76.0 |
| SCB | 20 | 10.0 | 95.2 |
| True positive GBS cultures | 21 | 10.5 | |
aSensitivity was calculated in comparison to true positive cultures of all media
The results of latex agglutination test accompanied with the three culture methods
| Culture medium | Level of GBS density (c.f.u. per swab) | No. of samples tested positive ( | No. of samples positive for GBS ( | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBA | High (>100) | 3 | 3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Moderate (50–100) | 4 | 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Low (10–50) | 3 | 5 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 71.4 | |
| Little (<10) | 0 | 0 | / | / | / | / | |
| CNA | High (>100) | 3 | 3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Moderate (50–100) | 5 | 5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Low (10–50) | 4 | 7 | 57.1 | 100 | 100 | 70 | |
| Little (<10) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50 | |
| SCB | High (>100) | 15 | 15 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Moderate (50–100) | 5 | 5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Low (10–50) | 0 | 0 | / | / | / | / | |
| Little (<10) | 0 | 0 | / | / | / | / |