Literature DB >> 26791057

Sex Versus Gender-Related Characteristics: Which Predicts Outcome After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Young?

Roxanne Pelletier1, Nadia A Khan2, Jafna Cox3, Stella S Daskalopoulou4, Mark J Eisenberg5, Simon L Bacon6, Kim L Lavoie7, Kaberi Daskupta8, Doreen Rabi9, Karin H Humphries10, Colleen M Norris11, George Thanassoulis12, Hassan Behlouli8, Louise Pilote13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: "Gender" reflects social norms for women and men, whereas "sex" defines biological characteristics. Gender-related characteristics explain some differences in access to care for premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS); whether they are associated with cardiovascular outcomes is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: This study estimated associations between gender and sex with recurrent ACS and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (e.g., ACS, cardiac mortality, revascularization) over 12 months in patients with ACS.
METHODS: We studied 273 women and 636 men age 18 to 55 years from GENESIS-PRAXY (GENdEr and Sex determInantS of cardiovascular disease: from bench to beyond-Premature Acute Coronary SYndrome), a prospective observational cohort study, who were hospitalized for ACS between January 2009 and April 2013. Gender-related characteristics (e.g., social roles) were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire, and a composite measure of gender was derived. Outcomes included recurrent ACS and MACE over 12 months.
RESULTS: Feminine roles and personality traits were associated with higher rates of recurrent ACS and MACE compared with masculine characteristics. This difference persisted for recurrent ACS, after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio from score 0 to 100: 4.50; 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 19.27), and was a nonstatistically significant trend for MACE (hazard ratio: 1.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 2.66). A possible explanation is increased anxiety, the only condition that was more prevalent in patients with feminine characteristics and that rendered the association between gender and recurrent ACS nonstatistically significant (hazard ratio: 3.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.81 to 15.61). Female sex was not associated with outcomes post-ACS.
CONCLUSIONS: Younger adults with ACS with feminine gender are at an increased risk of recurrent ACS over 12 months, independent of female sex.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse cardiovascular outcomes; epidemiology; feminine gender roles and traits; premature acute coronary syndrome; stress; women

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791057     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  58 in total

1.  Gender-based analysis using existing public health datasets.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-04

2.  Understanding vasovagal syncope: a role for sex and gender.

Authors:  Satish R Raj; Sofia B Ahmed; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 3.  Young Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Rachel P Dreyer; Christopher Sciria; Erica S Spatz; Basmah Safdar; Gail D'Onofrio; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 4.  The Impact of Sex and Gender on Stroke.

Authors:  Kathryn M Rexrode; Tracy E Madsen; Amy Y X Yu; Cheryl Carcel; Judith H Lichtman; Eliza C Miller
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Gender/Sex Differences in the Relationship between Psychosocial Work Exposures and Work and Life Stress.

Authors:  Kathy Padkapayeva; Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet; Amber Bielecky; Selahadin Ibrahim; Cameron Mustard; Chantal Brisson; Peter Smith
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Sex differences in crude mortality rates and predictive value of intensive care unit-based scores when applied to the cardiac intensive care unit.

Authors:  Romana Herscovici; James Mirocha; Jed Salomon; Noel B Merz; Bojan Cercek; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2019-08-27

Review 7.  Sex differences in cardiometabolic disorders.

Authors:  Eva Gerdts; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Protocol for the WARM Hearts study: examining cardiovascular disease risk in middle-aged and older women - a prospective, observational cohort study.

Authors:  Alexandra V Rose; Kevin F Boreskie; Jacqueline L Hay; Liam Thompson; Rakesh C Arora; Todd A Duhamel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  The Effects of Biological Sex on Sepsis Treatments in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and a Narrative Elaboration on Sex- and Gender-Dependent Differences in Sepsis.

Authors:  MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 10.  Improving translational research in sex-specific effects of comorbidities and risk factors in ischaemic heart disease and cardioprotection: position paper and recommendations of the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart.

Authors:  Cinzia Perrino; Péter Ferdinandy; Hans E Bøtker; Bianca J J M Brundel; Peter Collins; Sean M Davidson; Hester M den Ruijter; Felix B Engel; Eva Gerdts; Henrique Girao; Mariann Gyöngyösi; Derek J Hausenloy; Sandrine Lecour; Rosalinda Madonna; Michael Marber; Elizabeth Murphy; Maurizio Pesce; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Joost P G Sluijter; Sabine Steffens; Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü; Linda W Van Laake; Sophie Van Linthout; Rainer Schulz; Kirsti Ytrehus
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 10.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.