Literature DB >> 26791045

Open Access Could Transform Drug Discovery: A Case Study of JQ1.

Zeeshaan Arshad1,2, James Smith3,4, Mackenna Roberts4, Wen Hwa Lee1, Ben Davies3,4, Kim Bure5, Georg A Hollander6,7, Sue Dopson8, Chas Bountra1, David Brindley3,4,8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The cost to develop a new drug from target discovery to market is a staggering $1.8 billion, largely due to the very high attrition rate of drug candidates and the lengthy transition times during development. Open access is an emerging model of open innovation that places no restriction on the use of information and has the potential to accelerate the development of new drugs. AREAS COVERED: To date, no quantitative assessment has yet taken place to determine the effects and viability of open access on the process of drug translation. This need is addressed within this study. The literature and intellectual property landscapes of the drug candidate JQ1, which was made available on an open access basis when discovered, and conventionally developed equivalents that were not are compared using the Web of Science and Thomson Innovation software, respectively. EXPERT OPINION: Results demonstrate that openly sharing the JQ1 molecule led to a greater uptake by a wider and more multi-disciplinary research community. A comparative analysis of the patent landscapes for each candidate also found that the broader scientific diaspora of the publically released JQ1 data enhanced innovation, evidenced by a greater number of downstream patents filed in relation to JQ1. The authors' findings counter the notion that open access drug discovery would leak commercial intellectual property. On the contrary, JQ1 serves as a test case to evidence that open access drug discovery can be an economic model that potentially improves efficiency and cost of drug discovery and its subsequent commercialization.

Keywords:  Bromodomain; Drug Discovery; Epigenetics; Healthcare Translation; JQ1; Open Access; Open Innovation; SGC (Structural Genomics Consortium)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791045     DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2016.1144587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov        ISSN: 1746-0441            Impact factor:   6.098


  7 in total

1.  Chemical probes: A shared toolbox.

Authors:  Andrew R Scott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Accelerating target discovery using pre-competitive open science-patients need faster innovation more than anyone else.

Authors:  Eric Low; Chas Bountra; Wen Hwa Lee
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-08-03

Review 3.  Open Science Meets Stem Cells: A New Drug Discovery Approach for Neurodegenerative Disorders.

Authors:  Chanshuai Han; Mathilde Chaineau; Carol X-Q Chen; Lenore K Beitel; Thomas M Durcan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Bromodomain protein 4 discriminates tissue-specific super-enhancers containing disease-specific susceptibility loci in prostate and breast cancer.

Authors:  Verena Zuber; Francesco Bettella; Aree Witoelar; Ole A Andreassen; Ian G Mills; Alfonso Urbanucci
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Establishing a reliable framework for harnessing the creative power of the scientific crowd.

Authors:  Adrian J Carter; Amy Donner; Wen Hwa Lee; Chas Bountra
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Ideation and implementation of an open science drug discovery business model - M4K Pharma.

Authors:  Maxwell Robert Morgan; Owen Gwilym Roberts; Aled Morgan Edwards
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 7.  Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.

Authors:  Tony Ross-Hellauer; Stefan Reichmann; Nicki Lisa Cole; Angela Fessl; Thomas Klebel; Nancy Pontika
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.