Literature DB >> 26790833

Surgical comparison of subinguinal and high inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for adolescent varicocele.

Koji Shiraishi1, Shintaro Oka1, Hideyasu Matsuyama1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes of subinguinal and high inguinal approaches for microsurgical varicocelectomy.
METHODS: A total of 81 patients with left varicocele were randomly assigned to undergo microsurgical left varicocelectomy by the subinguinal (n = 41) or high inguinal (n = 40) approach. These two techniques were compared with regard to the operative parameters, complications and testicular growth. Anatomical parameters, including the numbers and diameters of internal spermatic arteries, veins and lymphatic vessels, were recorded.
RESULTS: The microsurgical step was significantly shorter for the high inguinal approach compared with the subinguinal approach (25.5 vs 33.3 min, respectively, P < 0.01). The numbers of preserved arteries and ligated veins were significantly greater and the artery size was significantly smaller for the subinguinal (1.6 arteries, 11.5 veins and 1.1 mm, respectively) compared with the high inguinal approach (1.2 arteries, 7.3 veins and 1.3 mm; P < 0.001, <0.0001 and <0.01, respectively). There was one patient with postoperative hydrocele, and three with persistent scrotal pain after treatment with the subinguinal approach. The postoperative catch-up growth rates at 24 months were 70% and 78% for the subinguinal and high inguinal approaches, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The microsurgical subinguinal and high inguinal approaches seem to yield similar success rates in terms of testicular growth. However, the high inguinal approach is easier to carry out, as it requires fewer divisions of veins and is associated with a larger diameter of the spermatic artery.
© 2016 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; anatomy; complications; microsurgery; varicocele

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26790833     DOI: 10.1111/iju.13050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of testicular catch-up growth in adolescent microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Fevzi Bedir; Ercüment Keskin; Mehmet Karabakan; İbrahim Karabulut; Fatih Kürşat Yılmazel; Ertuğrul Gazi Özbey; Yılmaz Aksoy; İsa Özbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

Review 2.  Best practice in the diagnosis and treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Matthew R Macey; Ryan C Owen; Sherry S Ross; R Matthew Coward
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-06-22

Review 3.  Transitional Urology for Male Adolescents: What Adult Urologists Should Know.

Authors:  Kristina D Suson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Current Issues in Adolescent Varicocele: Pediatric Urological Perspectives.

Authors:  Jae Min Chung; Sang Don Lee
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.400

5.  Clinical effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with enhanced recovery after surgery for varicocele.

Authors:  Xiaobin Wang; Ruipeng Wang; Qiang Du; Bochen Pan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

6.  Hydrocortisone relieves the immediate post-operative scrotal edema after inguinal varicocelectomy: A prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Samir Elhanbly; Tamer Youssef; Ayman Elkholy; Mamdouh Abdel-Gawad; Taymour Mostafa
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 7.  Management and Treatment of Varicocele in Children and Adolescents: An Endocrinologic Perspective.

Authors:  Rossella Cannarella; Aldo E Calogero; Rosita A Condorelli; Filippo Giacone; Antonio Aversa; Sandro La Vignera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.