| Literature DB >> 26790535 |
Xiaomeng Yang1, Anxin Wang1,2, Xiaoxue Liu3, Shasha An4, Shuohua Chen4, Yilong Wang1,5,6, Yongjun Wang1,5,6, Shouling Wu4.
Abstract
The American Heart Association defined 7 ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics and the benefits of them in reducing the incidence of stroke are well established, but it is unclear whether changes in them alter stroke risk. We calculated the changes of 7 ideal CVH metrics from 2006 to 2008 among 64,373 participants in the Kailuan study. We tested whether changes in the numbers and total scores for the CVH metrics were associated with the incidence of stroke in the 4.89 person-years follow-up. Cox regression modeling was used to estimate the risk of stroke. By year 2008, CVH metrics number of 32.54% participants improved (change ≥+1); 31.90% deteriorated (≤-1); 35.56% stayed the same; In the follow-up,we identified1,182 incident stroke events. Each increase in CVH metrics and every 1-point increase in total CVH score from 2006 to 2008 were associated with reduced odds of total stroke (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval; 0.83-0.92 and 0.89[0.86-0.92] respectively), after adjusting for age, gender, educational level, income and scores for the metrics of ideal CVH at baseline. Positive changes in ideal CVH metrics reduce the incidence of stroke. Our results support the concept that achieving ideal CVH helps to prevent stroke.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26790535 PMCID: PMC4726201 DOI: 10.1038/srep19673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flowchart of the study.
Baseline characteristics of participants by number of CVH metrics in 2006.
| Variable | Number of Ideal CVH Metrics in 2006 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | P Value | |
| No. of participants | 939 | 5795 | 14882 | 20700 | 15259 | 5859 | 860 | 79 | <0.001 |
| Age, year, mean (SD) | 50.88 ± 8.83 | 50.66 ± 10.27 | 51.38 ± 10.93 | 50.87 ± 11.72 | 49.77 ± 12.77 | 46.43 ± 13.64 | 47.5 ± 14.48 | 51 ± 12.23 | <0.001 |
| Women, n (%) | 11 (1.2) | 460 (7.9) | 1979 (13.3) | 3927 (19.0) | 4345 (28.5) | 2776 (47.4) | 439 (51.0) | 41 (51.9) | <0.001 |
| High school or above, n (%) | 173 (18.4) | 1134 (19.6) | 2770 (18.6) | 3955 (19.1) | 3557 (23.3) | 2167 (37.0) | 410 (47.7) | 37 (46.8) | <0.001 |
| Income > 800, RMB/month, n (%) | 153 (16.3) | 975 (16.8) | 2152 (14.5) | 2773 (13.4) | 2182 (14.3) | 1177 (20.1) | 219 (25.5) | 16 (20.3) | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) | 28.22 ± 2.54 | 27.6 ± 2.83 | 26.63 ± 3.17 | 25.24 ± 3.36 | 23.37 ± 2.86 | 22.33 ± 2.39 | 22.04 ± ± 2.11 | 21.79 ± 2.08 | <0.001 |
| TC,mmol/L, mean (SD) | 235.86 ± 37.56 | 224.77 ± 42.05 | 206.52 ± 45.94 | 187.76 ± 43.36 | 176.53 ± 37.29 | 170.26 ± 30.87 | 167.12 ± 26.95 | 169.81 ± 20.17 | <0.001 |
| SBP, mmHg, mean (SD) | 140.94 ± 20.75 | 138.31 ± 18.81 | 135.52 ± 18.93 | 131.67 ± 19.24 | 124.28 ± 19.27 | 112.53 ± 16.74 | 111.77 ± 16.26 | 105.99 ± 8.79 | <0.001 |
| DSP, mmHg, mean (SD) | 90.24 ± 11.87 | 88.76 ± 10.88 | 86.81 ± 10.75 | 84.34 ± 10.76 | 79.86 ± 10.69 | 72.80 ± 9.36 | 72.48 ± 8.70 | 69.93 ± 6.15 | <0.001 |
| FBG, mmol/L, mean (SD) | 143.45 ± 45.78 | 119.57 ± 41.56 | 104.87 ± 34.41 | 95.33 ± 23.89 | 90.89 ± 16.58 | 88.8 ± 12.98 | 87.89 ± 10.05 | 86.55 ± 9.97 | <0.001 |
Data are presented as n, n (%) or mean ± SD. ANOVAs and χ2 tests were performed.
CVH indicates cardiovascular health; TC, total cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DSP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 2Relationship observed between change of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics number (from year 2006 to 2008) and the incidence of stroke according to different levels of CVH metrics number at baseline.
The horizontal axis indicates the change of CVH metrics number between year 2006 and 2008.
Change in CVH metrics number from 2006 to 2008 predicting stroke in the follow-up.
| Variable | Stroke (n = 1182) | Ischemic (n = 978) | Intracerebral hemorrhagic (n = 196) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| Model 1 | 0.89 (0.85–0.94) | <0.001 | 0.87 (0.82–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.99 (0.87–1.13) | 0.87 |
| Model 2 | 0.87 (0.83–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.85 (0.80–0.90) | <0.001 | 0.97 (0.85–1.11) | 0.67 |
| Model 3 | 0.87 (0.83–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.85 (0.80–0.90) | <0.001 | 0.97 (0.85–1.11) | 0.67 |
CVH indicates cardiovascular health; HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence interval; Cox proportional hazards regression was performed.
aModel 1: Adjusted for CVH metrics score at baseline.
bModel 2: Adjusted for age, women, CVH metrics score at baseline.
cModel 3: Adjusted for age, women, education, income, CVH metrics score at baseline.
Change in CVH metrics score from 2006 to 2008 predicting stroke in the follow-up.
| Variable | Stroke (n = 1182) | Ischemic (n = 978) | Intracerebral hemorrhagic (n = 196) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| Model 1 | 0.91 (0.88–0.94) | <0.001 | 0.90 (0.87–0.94) | <0.001 | 0.93 (0.85–1.00) | 0.06 |
| Model 2 | 0.89 (0.86–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.88 (0.85–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.91 (0.84–0.99) | 0.03 |
| Model 3 | 0.89 (0.86–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.88 (0.85–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.91 (0.84–0.99) | 0.03 |
CVH indicates cardiovascular health; HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence interval; Cox proportional hazards regression was performed.
aModel 1: Adjusted for CVH metrics score at baseline.
bModel 2: Adjusted for age, women, CVH metrics score at baseline.
cModel 3: Adjusted for age, women, education, income, CVH metrics score at baseline.
Change in each CVH metric score from 2006 to 2008 predicting stroke in the follow-up.
| CVH metric | Stroke (n = 1182) | Ischemic (n = 978) | Intracerebral hemorrhagic (n = 196) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| Smoke | 1.00 (0.92–1.07) | 0.89 | 0.97 (0.89–1.05) | 0.45 | 1.17 (0.97–1.41) | 0.11 |
| Salt intake | 1.06 (0.94–1.19) | 0.33 | 1.03 (0.91–1.17) | 0.60 | 1.14 (0.86–1.50) | 0.38 |
| Physical activity | 0.91 (0.83–0.99) | 0.045 | 0.93 (0.84–1.03) | 0.15 | 0.84 (0.67–1.05) | 0.12 |
| TC | 0.84 (0.77–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.82 (0.75–0.91) | <0.001 | 0.92 (0.73–1.15) | 0.45 |
| BP | 0.59 (0.53–0.66) | <0.001 | 0.61 (0.54–0.69) | <0.001 | 0.52 (0.39–0.69) | <0.001 |
| FBG | 0.81 (0.73–0.89) | <0.001 | 0.79 (0.71–0.88) | <0.001 | 0.83 (0.65–1.06) | 0.14 |
| BMI | 0.89 (0.79–1.01) | 0.07 | 0.90 (0.79–1.03) | 0.14 | 0.86 (0.64–1.16) | 0.31 |
CVH indicates cardiovascular health; HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence interval; TC, total cholesterol; BP, blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose ; BMI, body mass index; Cox proportional hazards regression was performed.
aAdjusted for age, gender, education, income, CVH score at baseline.
Hazard ratios (P Value) for CVH metrics score change when 1 CVH metric is omitted.
| Omitted CVH metric | Stroke (n = 1182) | Ischemic (n = 978) | Intracerebral hemorrhagic (n = 196) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| Smoke | 0.87 (0.84–0.90) | <0.001 | 0.87 (0.83–0.91) | <0.001 | 0.87 (0.79–0.95) | 0.002 |
| Salt intake | 0.87 (0.84–0.90) | <0.001 | 0.87 (0.83–0.90) | <0.001 | 0.89 (0.82–0.91) | 0.01 |
| Physical activity | 0.89 (0.86–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.88 (0.85–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.92 (0.85–1.02) | 0.11 |
| TC | 0.89 (0.85–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.88 (0.85–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.90 (0.83–0.99) | 0.03 |
| BP | 0.91 (0.88–0.95) | <0.001 | 0.90 (0.87–0.94) | <0.001 | 0.95 (0.87–1.05) | 0.32 |
| FBG | 0.90 (0.86–0.93) | <0.001 | 0.89 (0.86–0.93) | <0.001 | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 0.07 |
| BMI | 0.88 (0.85–0.91) | <0.001 | 0.87 (0.84–0.91) | <0.001 | 0.91 (0.83–0.99) | 0.03 |
CVH indicates cardiovascular health; HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence interval; TC, total cholesterol; BP, blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; BMI, body mass index; Cox proportional hazards regression was performed.
aAdjusted for age, gender, education, income, CVH score at baseline and 6 indicator variables representing the 7 possible baseline CVH metrics.