Wendy B Bostwick1, Tonda L Hughes2, Bethany Everett3. 1. 1 Public Health and Health Education Programs, Department of Nursing and Health Studies, Northern Illinois University , DeKalb, Illinois. 2. 2 Department of Health Systems Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago , College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois. 3. 3 Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare health behaviors, and physical and mental health outcomes in a community-based sample of bisexual and lesbian women. METHODS: The Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women (CHLEW) study is a longitudinal study of sexual minority women's health. Wave 3 of the CHLEW used a modified version of respondent-driven sampling to recruit a supplemental sample of bisexual-identified women into the study, with an additional focus on younger women, and Black and Latina women. Face-to-face interviews were conducted and data were captured using computer-assisted interviews. Data from the supplemental Wave 3 sample are reported here. RESULTS: Bisexual (n=139) and lesbian women (n=227) did not differ on most health outcomes, either in terms of prevalence or adjusted odds. Bisexual women were at higher risk of ever being diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) (AOR=3.01) and scoring 10 or more on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (AOR=1.73) compared to lesbian women. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the prevailing view of bisexual women as being at higher risk for many/most negative health outcomes, we found relatively few differences between bisexual and lesbian women in the current study. Additional research is needed to better understand risk and resilience factors among bisexual women specifically, and sexual minority women more broadly.
PURPOSE: To compare health behaviors, and physical and mental health outcomes in a community-based sample of bisexual and lesbian women. METHODS: The Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women (CHLEW) study is a longitudinal study of sexual minority women's health. Wave 3 of the CHLEW used a modified version of respondent-driven sampling to recruit a supplemental sample of bisexual-identified women into the study, with an additional focus on younger women, and Black and Latina women. Face-to-face interviews were conducted and data were captured using computer-assisted interviews. Data from the supplemental Wave 3 sample are reported here. RESULTS: Bisexual (n=139) and lesbian women (n=227) did not differ on most health outcomes, either in terms of prevalence or adjusted odds. Bisexual women were at higher risk of ever being diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) (AOR=3.01) and scoring 10 or more on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (AOR=1.73) compared to lesbian women. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the prevailing view of bisexual women as being at higher risk for many/most negative health outcomes, we found relatively few differences between bisexual and lesbian women in the current study. Additional research is needed to better understand risk and resilience factors among bisexual women specifically, and sexual minority women more broadly.
Entities:
Keywords:
bisexual; health disparities; health status; lesbian; sexual minority women; sexual orientation
Authors: Karen I Fredriksen-Goldsen; Hyun-Jun Kim; Susan E Barkan; Kimberly F Balsam; Shawn L Mincer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tonda L Hughes; Timothy P Johnson; Alana D Steffen; Sharon C Wilsnack; Bethany Everett Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Robin J Lewis; Sarah J Ehlke; Alexander T Shappie; Abby L Braitman; Kristin E Heron Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Barth B Riley; Tonda L Hughes; Sharon C Wilsnack; Timothy P Johnson; Perry Benson; Frances Aranda Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 2.164