Literature DB >> 26789485

Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Following Waterbirth: The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009 Cohort.

Marit L Bovbjerg, Melissa Cheyney, Courtney Everson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Data on the safety of waterbirth in the United States are lacking.
METHODS: We used data from the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, birth years 2004 to 2009. We compared outcomes of neonates born underwater waterbirth (n = 6534), neonates not born underwater nonwaterbirth (n = 10,290), and neonates whose mothers intended a waterbirth but did not have one intended waterbirth (n = 1573). Neonatal outcomes included a 5-minute Apgar score of less than 7, neonatal hospital transfer, and hospitalization or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission in the first 6 weeks. Maternal outcomes included genital tract trauma, postpartum hospital transfer, and hospitalization or infection (uterine, endometrial, perineal) in the first 6 weeks. We used logistic regression for all analyses, controlling for primiparity.
RESULTS: Waterbirth neonates experienced fewer negative outcomes than nonwaterbirth neonates: the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for hospital transfer was 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.68; P < .001); the aOR for infant hospitalization in the first 6 weeks was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.88; P < .001); and the aOR for NICU admission was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76; P < .001). By comparison, neonates in the intended waterbirth group experienced more negative outcomes than the nonwaterbirth group, although only 5-minute Apgar score was significant (aOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.40-2.93; P < 0001). For women, waterbirth (compared to nonwaterbirth) was associated with fewer postpartum transfers (aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.84; P = .001) and hospitalizations in the first 6 weeks (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; P < 0.001) but with an increased odds of genital tract trauma (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P = .002). Waterbirth was not associated with maternal infection. Women in the intended waterbirth group had increased odds for all maternal outcomes compared to women in the nonwaterbirth group, although only genital tract trauma was significant (aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.49-1.87; P < .001). DISCUSSION: Waterbirth confers no additional risk to neonates; however, waterbirth may be associated with increased risk of genital tract trauma for women.
© 2016 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  childbirth; complications; perineal trauma; safety; waterbirth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26789485     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  9 in total

1.  Utility of the 5-Minute Apgar Score as a Research Endpoint.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Mekhala V Dissanayake; Melissa Cheyney; Jennifer Brown; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity score-matched land births.

Authors:  M L Bovbjerg; M Cheyney; A B Caughey
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.331

3.  Feature Article-Continuing Education Module-International Water-Birth Practices With Recommendations During a Global Pandemic.

Authors:  Barbara Harper
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2021-07-01

4.  Getting into the water: a prospective observational study of water immersion for labour and birth at a New Zealand District Health Board.

Authors:  Robyn M Maude; Mikyung Kim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Waterbirth: a national retrospective cohort study of factors associated with its use among women in England.

Authors:  H Aughey; J Jardine; N Moitt; K Fearon; J Hawdon; D Pasupathy; I Urganci; T Harris
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth.

Authors:  Ethel Burns; Claire Feeley; Priscilla J Hall; Jennifer Vanderlaan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Factors Associated With Normal Physiologic Birth for Women Who Labor In Water: A Secondary Analysis of A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Jane Carpenter; Ethel Burns; Lesley Smith
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 8.  Immersion in water during labour and birth.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Cluett; Ethel Burns; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-16

9.  Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Hospital-Based Deliveries With Water Immersion.

Authors:  Abbey C Sidebottom; Marc Vacquier; Kathrine Simon; Whitney Wunderlich; Patricia Fontaine; Dawn Dahlgren-Roemmich; Shannon Steinbring; Barbara Hyer; Lisa Saul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.