Alida Bouris1,2, Bethany G Everett3, Ryan D Heath1, Caitlin E Elsaesser4, Torsten B Neilands5. 1. 1 School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois. 2. 2 Chicago Center for HIV Elimination, University of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois. 3. 3 Department of Sociology, College of Social and Behavioral Science, The University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. 4 University of Connecticut School of Social Work , West Hartford, Connecticut. 5. 5 Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sexual minority youth (SMY) are at higher risk for victimization and suicide than are heterosexual youth (HY). Relatively little research has examined which types of victimization are most closely linked to suicide, which is necessary to develop targeted prevention interventions. The present study was conducted to address this deficit. METHODS: The data come from the 2011 Chicago Youth Risk Behavior Survey (n = 1,907). Structural equation modeling (SEM) in Mplus evaluated the direct, indirect, and total effects of sexual orientation on a latent indicator of suicidal ideation and behaviors via seven types of victimization. Four indicators of victimization were school-specific (e.g., harassment due to sexual orientation or gender identity (SO/GID), bullying, threatened or injured with a weapon, and skipping school due to safety concerns), and three indicators assessed other types of victimization (e.g., electronic bullying, intimate partner violence, and sexual abuse). RESULTS: Thirteen percent of youth were classified as SMY. Significantly more SMY than HY reported suicidal ideation (27.95% vs. 13.64%), a suicide plan (22.78% vs. 12.36%), and at least one suicide attempt (29.92% vs. 12.43%) in the past year (all P < .001). A greater percentage of SMY reported SO/GID-related harassment, skipping school, electronic bullying, and sexual abuse. Sexual orientation was not directly related to suicidal ideation and behaviors in SEM. Rather, SMY's elevated risk of suicidality functioned indirectly through two forms of school-based victimization: being threatened or injured with a weapon (B = .19, SE = .09, P ≤ .05) and experiencing SO/GID-specific harassment (B = .40, SE = .15, P ≤ .01). There also was a trend for SMY to skip school as a strategy to reduce suicide risk. CONCLUSION: Although SMY experience higher rates of victimization than do HY, school-based victimization that involves weapons or is due to one's SO/GID appear to be the most deleterious. That SMY may skip school to reduce their risk of suicidal ideation and behaviors is problematic, and schools should be encouraged to enact and enforce policies that explicitly protect SMY from victimization.
PURPOSE: Sexual minority youth (SMY) are at higher risk for victimization and suicide than are heterosexual youth (HY). Relatively little research has examined which types of victimization are most closely linked to suicide, which is necessary to develop targeted prevention interventions. The present study was conducted to address this deficit. METHODS: The data come from the 2011 Chicago Youth Risk Behavior Survey (n = 1,907). Structural equation modeling (SEM) in Mplus evaluated the direct, indirect, and total effects of sexual orientation on a latent indicator of suicidal ideation and behaviors via seven types of victimization. Four indicators of victimization were school-specific (e.g., harassment due to sexual orientation or gender identity (SO/GID), bullying, threatened or injured with a weapon, and skipping school due to safety concerns), and three indicators assessed other types of victimization (e.g., electronic bullying, intimate partner violence, and sexual abuse). RESULTS: Thirteen percent of youth were classified as SMY. Significantly more SMY than HY reported suicidal ideation (27.95% vs. 13.64%), a suicide plan (22.78% vs. 12.36%), and at least one suicide attempt (29.92% vs. 12.43%) in the past year (all P < .001). A greater percentage of SMY reported SO/GID-related harassment, skipping school, electronic bullying, and sexual abuse. Sexual orientation was not directly related to suicidal ideation and behaviors in SEM. Rather, SMY's elevated risk of suicidality functioned indirectly through two forms of school-based victimization: being threatened or injured with a weapon (B = .19, SE = .09, P ≤ .05) and experiencing SO/GID-specific harassment (B = .40, SE = .15, P ≤ .01). There also was a trend for SMY to skip school as a strategy to reduce suicide risk. CONCLUSION: Although SMY experience higher rates of victimization than do HY, school-based victimization that involves weapons or is due to one's SO/GID appear to be the most deleterious. That SMY may skip school to reduce their risk of suicidal ideation and behaviors is problematic, and schools should be encouraged to enact and enforce policies that explicitly protect SMY from victimization.
Entities:
Keywords:
LGBT youth; child and adolescent development; sexual orientation; suicide
Authors: Elizabeth M Saewyc; Carol L Skay; Sandra L Pettingell; Elizabeth A Reis; Linda Bearinger; Michael Resnick; Aileen Murphy; Leigh Combs Journal: Child Welfare Date: 2006 Mar-Apr
Authors: Kristi E Gamarel; Ryan J Watson; Raha Mouzoon; Christopher W Wheldon; Jessica N Fish; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2020-04
Authors: Gregory L Phillips; Blair C Turner; Dylan Felt; Rachel L Marro; Xinzi Wang; Megan M Ruprecht; Jacob Broschart; Lauren B Beach Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Gregory Phillips; Blair Turner; Paul Salamanca; Michelle Birkett; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Michael E Newcomb; Rachel Marro; Brian Mustanski Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jessica R Peters; Ethan H Mereish; Maya A Krek; Adam Chuong; Megan L Ranney; Joel Solomon; Anthony Spirito; Shirley Yen Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Anthony Fulginiti; Harmony Rhoades; Mary Rose Mamey; Cary Klemmer; Ankur Srivastava; Garrett Weskamp; Jeremy T Goldbach Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2020-11-18
Authors: Michael J Li; Sae Takada; Chukwuemeka N Okafor; Pamina M Gorbach; Steven J Shoptaw; Steven W Cole Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 7.217